Case law

International Engineering Company v. Richardson

361 F. Supp. 818 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 10, 1973

The Board agreed that the relief requested was beyond the delegation of the Board’s “Charter” and denied appellant’s motion to stay the Contracting Officer’s actions in that case. … Greater Boston TV v. FCC (su/pra).”

Illinois-Masonic Medical Center v. Sebelius

859 F. Supp. 2d 137 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 14, 2012

Thomas Jefferson Univ. v. … Ctr. v. Sullivan, 830 23 F.

Sanjour v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

7 F. Supp. 2d 14 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 10, 1998

Corp. v. Board of Governors of the Fed. … See Brown v. Trustees of Boston Univ., 891 F.2d 337 (1st Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 937 , 110 S.Ct. 3217 , 110 L.Ed.2d 664 (1990); Bresgal v.

Merrill v. FEDERAL OPEN MARKET COMMITTEE, ETC.

413 F. Supp. 494 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 9, 1976

In NLRB v. … In EPA v.

Agee v. Baker

753 F. Supp. 373 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 30, 1990

Agee v. Vance, 483 F.Supp. 729 (D.D.C.1980), aff'd, Agee v. Muskie, 629 F.2d 80 (D.C.Cir.1980), rev’d, Haig v. Agee, 453 U.S. 280 , 101 S.Ct. 2766 , 69 L.Ed.2d 640 (1981). … See United States v. Florida East Coast Ry.

Estate of Salvador Buruca v. District of Columbia

902 F. Supp. 2d 75 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 6, 2012

The plaintiff does make one argument worth examining: in his 911 call, Douglas Brown narrates several events to the dispatcher. … Brown, who stated that he heard the police give “verbal commands, but [he] could not make out the words.” Def.’s Mot, Ex. 3, at 2.

Coleman v. Potomac Electric Power Co.

422 F. Supp. 2d 209 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 21, 2006

Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 453 (D.C.Cir.1999). … Henderson, 94 F.Supp.2d 68, 72 (D.D.C.2000) (quoting Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d at 457); see Currier v.

Roberts-Gregory v. American Association for the Advancement of Science

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 16, 2026

Brown from the State Department “contacted Dr. Roberts-Gregory to ask how things were progressing with AAAS.” Id. ¶ 129. … For similar reasons, the Court finds the Federal Defendants’ reliance on Brown v. Mayorkas, No. CV 20-3107 (TJK), 2023 WL 3303862 (D.D.C. May 8, 2023), unavailing.

Watson v. Gaines

589 F. Supp. 2d 72 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 17, 2008

In United States Parole Comm’n v. … See, e.g., Campbell v. United States Parole Comm’n, 563 F.Supp.2d at 25-27 ; Davis v.

Fisher v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation

District Court, District of Columbia · May 31, 2020

Having remanded the case so that the Board could address § 4044.4(b), it would make little sense now to ignore the Board’s consideration of that issue. See Alpharma, Inc. v. Leavitt, 460 F.3d 1, 6 (D.C. … Constructors Co. v.

United States v. Nitschke

843 F. Supp. 2d 4 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 6, 2011

See United States v. Laureys, 653 F.3d 27 , 39 n. 2 (D.C.Cir.2011) (Brown, J., dissenting) (“Had the jury been correctly instructed, it could not reasonably have found Laureys guilty under § 2242(b). … .”); U.S. v.

True the Vote, Inc. v. Internal Revenue Service

District Court, District of Columbia · May 30, 2025

See Former Attorneys’ Resp. at 6 (quoting Browne v. Waldo, No. 2:20-CV-196-JVB-APR, 2023 WL 2482847, at *1 (N.D. Ind. Feb. 23, 2023)). … Former Attorneys’ Resp. at 6 (quoting Browne, 2023 WL 2482847, at *1).

Chase v. Coe

31 F. Supp. 935 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 8, 1940

Bakelite Corporation v. National Aniline & Chemical Company, 2 Cir., 83 F.2d 176 ; Jensen v. Lorenz, 68 App.D.C. 39 , 92 F.2d 992 ; United States ex rel. White v. Coe, 68 App.D.C. 218 , 95 F.2d 347 ; Wettlaufer v. … Co. v. Robinson, 1913 C.D. 332, 39 App.D.C. 504 ; In re Wasserfallen, 54 App.D.C. 367 , 298 F. 826 ; In re Cutler, 1919 C.D. 191, 48 App. D. C. 444; International Cellucotton Products Co. v.

Alkanani v. Aegis Defense Services, LLC

976 F. Supp. 2d 13 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 26, 2014

LCvR 72.3(c); Houlahan v. Brown, No. 11-1240, 2013 WL 5548839, at *1 (D.D.C. Oct. 8, 2013) (citation omitted). … United States v. Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc., 800 F.

Bishop v. U.S. Department of Agriculture

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 9, 2020

(citing Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002)). Courts construe a pro se litigant’s submissions liberally. See Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007). … See Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 152 (D.C.

Neal v. Reyna

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 12, 2010

He relies on the Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. … Therefore, where the Constitutional or statutory claims raise issues unrelated to discrimination, Brown has no pre-emptive effect. See Rochon v. FBI, 691 F.

Painters' Pension Trust Fund of Washington, D.C. & Vicinity v. Manganaro Corp., Maryland

693 F. Supp. 1222 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 30, 1988

Board of Trustees v. Universal Enterprises, Inc., 751 F.2d 1177, 1183-84 (11th Cir.1985) (denying preclusive effect to AU finding on alter ego issue); O’Hare v. … McSurely v. McClellan, 697 F.2d 309 , 317 n. 13 (D.C.Cir.1982); Hammerman v.

Missouri Department of Social Services v. Department of Health and Human Services

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 13, 2019

Supp. 2d 60, 66 n.3 (D.D.C. 2006)); see also Cement Kiln Recycling Coal. v. EPA, 255 F.3d 855, 869 (D.C. … See Board Decision at 14–15.

Montgomery v. Mayorkas

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 4, 2024

Cir. 2019) (quoting Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 152 (D.C. … For example, in Brown v.

Wayne, Jr. v. Male Coasian

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 18, 2025

See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v.