Case law

Hitchens v. Hitchens

47 F. Supp. 73 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 29, 1942

Reifschneider v. Reifschneider, 1909, 241 Ill. 92 , 89 N.E. 255 ; Buszin v. McKibbin, 1929, 254 Ill.App. 519 ; Schwartz v. Schwartz, 1925, 236 Ill.App. 336 ; Browning v. … Brooke, 1883, 60 Md. 524 ; see, also: Owings v. Owings, 1916, 141 Md. 416 , 118 A. 858 . 30 Corder v. Corder, 1922, 141 Md. 114 , 117 A. 119 ; Brown v.

Bishop v. U.S. Department of Agriculture

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 9, 2020

(citing Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002)). Courts construe a pro se litigant’s submissions liberally. See Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007). … See Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 152 (D.C.

Bell v. Gonzales

398 F. Supp. 2d 78 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 25, 2005

Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 457 (D.C.Cir.1999) (emphasis added). … One other photographer, Kevin Brown, described his relationship with Feyerherm as worse than Bell’s. Brown Depo. at 37-38 (Pl.’s Exhibit 31) (stating Brown had the worst relationship with Feyerherm).

Edwards v. United States

District Court, District of Columbia · May 29, 2020

In August of 2013, Edwards appealed OWCP’s denial of reconsideration to the Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board (“ECAB”) (see Feb. 10, 2014, ECAB Decision and Order, Attach. … DATE: May 29, 2020 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

Stewart v. Mabus

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 24, 2016

Stewart petitioned the Board to reverse these amendments, and the Board denied Stewart's request. Stewart then appealed the Board's decision to this Court. … No. 32] before the Board when it reached its decision, 5 U.S.C. § 706. IMS, P.C. v. Alvarez, 129 F.3d 618, 623 (D.C.

Joyce v. Silveri Tile Co., LC

27 F. Supp. 2d 251 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 25, 1998

From this, the court held that the Board had acted reasonably. Since the Board’s revised interpretation of prehire agreements, this Circuit has not had the opportunity to revisit this issue further. … These cases include: Sheet Metal Workers' International Association AFL-CIO v. NLRB, 989 F.2d 515 (D.C.Cir.1993); Wilson and Sons Heating and Plumbing, Inc. v. NLRB, 971 F.2d 758 (D.C.Cir.1992); Bufco Corp. v.

Copus v. Rougeau

504 F. Supp. 534 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 22, 1980

Brown, 441 U.S. 281 , 99 S.Ct. 1705 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979), where the very regulations at issue here were considered and held not binding on the OFCCP. Mr. … See NLRB v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 421 U.S. 132, 138 , 95 S.Ct. 1504, 1510 , 44 L.Ed.2d 29 (1975); Coastal States Gas Corp. v.

Williams v. American Airlines, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 18, 2025

Holcomb v. Powell, 433 F.3d 889, 895 (D.C. Cir. 2006) (quoting Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 248 (1986)). … See, e.g., Wallace v.

Naqvi v. Saudi Arabian Airlines, Inc.

123 F. Supp. 3d 129 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 12, 2016

Co. v. Franklin & Pittsylvania R.R. … That heightened duty, however, does not apply here, where all of the alleged breaches occurred while Plaintiff was in transit between and within terminals and before he boarded an SAA flight. See Jones v. Wash. Metro.

Yee v. Garland

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 7, 2022

See id.; see also Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … Chappell-Johnson v. Powell, 440 F.3d 484, 488 (D.C. Cir. 2006), quoting Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C. Cir. 1999).

Safeway Stores Incorporated v. Federal Trade Commission

428 F. Supp. 346 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 12, 1977

NLRB v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 421 U.S. 132 , 95 S.Ct. 1504 , 44 L.Ed.2d 29 (1975); Renegotiation Board v. Grumman Aircraft Engineering Corp., 421 U.S. 168 , 95 S.Ct. 1491 , 44 L.Ed.2d 57 (1975); Fisher v. … Renegotiation Board, 153 U.S.App.D.C. 398 , 473 F.2d 109, 115 (1972); Montrose Chemical Corporation of California v. Train, 160 U.S.App.D.C. 270 , 491 F.2d 63 (1974); Virginia Independent Schools Ass’n v.

Estate of Salvador Buruca v. District of Columbia

902 F. Supp. 2d 75 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 6, 2012

The plaintiff does make one argument worth examining: in his 911 call, Douglas Brown narrates several events to the dispatcher. … Brown, who stated that he heard the police give “verbal commands, but [he] could not make out the words.” Def.’s Mot, Ex. 3, at 2.

Roberts-Gregory v. American Association for the Advancement of Science

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 16, 2026

Brown from the State Department “contacted Dr. Roberts-Gregory to ask how things were progressing with AAAS.” Id. ¶ 129. … For similar reasons, the Court finds the Federal Defendants’ reliance on Brown v. Mayorkas, No. CV 20-3107 (TJK), 2023 WL 3303862 (D.D.C. May 8, 2023), unavailing.

Steele v. Salb

681 F. Supp. 2d 34 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 29, 2010

(quoting Dixon v. Co-burg Dairy, Inc., 369 F.3d 811, 815-16 (4th Cir.2004) (en banc)); see also Johnson-Brown v. 2200 M. St. … Downey, 568 F.Supp.2d at 30 ; see also Bhagwanani v. Howard Univ., 355 F.Supp.2d 294, 297 (D.D.C.2005). If the party “cannot meet this burden, the court must remand the case.” Johnson-Brown, 257 F.Supp.2d at 177 .

True the Vote, Inc. v. Internal Revenue Service

District Court, District of Columbia · May 30, 2025

See Former Attorneys’ Resp. at 6 (quoting Browne v. Waldo, No. 2:20-CV-196-JVB-APR, 2023 WL 2482847, at *1 (N.D. Ind. Feb. 23, 2023)). … Former Attorneys’ Resp. at 6 (quoting Browne, 2023 WL 2482847, at *1).

King v. Califano

471 F. Supp. 180 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 4, 1979

Harper v. United States, 423 F.Supp. 192, 197 (D.S.C.1976). … Chrysler Corp. v. Brown,-U.S.-, 99 S.Ct. 1705 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979); Charles River Park “A”, Inc. v. Department of Housing and Urban Development, 171 U.S.App.D.C. 286 , 519 F.2d 935 (1975).

Allston v. Gaines

158 F. Supp. 2d 76 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 31, 2001

See Maddox v. Elzie, 238 F.3d 437, 445-47 (D.C.Cir.2001); Hammond v. D.C. Board of Parole, 756 A.2d 896 (D.C.2000). … See Brandon v. District of Columbia Board of Parole, 823 F.2d 644, 645-46 (D.C.Cir.1987).

Illinois-Masonic Medical Center v. Sebelius

859 F. Supp. 2d 137 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 14, 2012

Thomas Jefferson Univ. v. … Ctr. v. Sullivan, 830 23 F.

Koch v. Donaldson

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 6, 2011

Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C. Cir. 1999). … Brown, 199 F.3d at 457.

Wayne, Jr. v. Male Coasian

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 18, 2025

See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v.