Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
5.66s
District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2022
Sutton caused the death of Karon Hylton-Brown by recklessly pursuing Mr. Hylton-Brown in a police vehicle for several blocks and at high speeds. See Indictment {ff 1-2, 10-12, 20-27. Mr. … Hylton-Brown’s death and the proximate cause of Mr.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Mar 2, 2012
Buesgens v. Brown, 567 F. Supp. 2d 26, 31 (D.D.C. 2008). Accordingly, to establish personal jurisdiction over a defendant, the plaintiff must allege specific acts connecting the defendant with the forum. Id. … Compare Azmar v. Stern, 662 F.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMarcello v. Attorney General of the United States
347 F. Supp. 898 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 27, 1972
Marcello v. INS, C.A.5, 1971, 449 F.2d 349 . … Plaintiff’s citation of Foti v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedSyneeda Lynn Penland v. Raymond Edwin Mabus, Jr.
78 F. Supp. 3d 484 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 30, 2015
See Runkle v. … Kreis v. Sec’y of Air Force, 866 F.2d 1508, 1514 (D.C. Cir. 1989). “All that is required is that the Board’s decision minimally contain a rational connection between the facts found and the choice made.” Frizelle v.
Cited 12 timesPublishedUab Skyroad Leasing v. Ojsc Tajik Air
District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 26, 2021
Ltd. v. Nat’l Port Auth., 680 F.3d 805, 814 (D.C. Cir. 2012); see also First Nat’l City Bank v. … See Board Article. Thus, the officials who run the Tajik government run the Supervisory Board.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States v. American Bar Ass'n
934 F. Supp. 435 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 25, 1996
. *436 (C) “Board” means the ABA Board of Governors. … V.
Cited 3 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Aug 24, 2022
Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. … Brown v.
Cited 0 timesPublished681 F. Supp. 2d 34 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 29, 2010
(quoting Dixon v. Co-burg Dairy, Inc., 369 F.3d 811, 815-16 (4th Cir.2004) (en banc)); see also Johnson-Brown v. 2200 M. St. … Downey, 568 F.Supp.2d at 30 ; see also Bhagwanani v. Howard Univ., 355 F.Supp.2d 294, 297 (D.D.C.2005). If the party “cannot meet this burden, the court must remand the case.” Johnson-Brown, 257 F.Supp.2d at 177 .
Cited 14 timesPublishedState of Texas v. United States of America
279 F.R.D. 24 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 2, 2012
Cir. 2006); see Alexander v. … See Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. Williams, 62 F.3d 408 (D.C. Cir. 1995).
Vacated in part, on other grounds by Texas v. United States, 279 F.R.D. 176 (2012)Cited 6 timesPublishedShepherd v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.
862 F. Supp. 505 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 13, 1994
See Brown v. … This court's decision in Brown v. Pro Football, 846 F.Supp. at 117 nn. 16, 17 and Appendix B, is not to the contrary.
Reversed on other grounds by Michele E. Shepherd and Larue Graves v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc., 62 F.3d 1469 (1995)Cited 4 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Jan 29, 2026
Daim- lerChrysler Corp. v. Cuno, 547 U.S. 332, 342 (2006). … Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 335 (1976).
Cited 0 timesPublishedNational Postal Union v. Blount
341 F. Supp. 370 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 15, 1972
See, e. g., Motor Coach Employees v. Lockridge, 403 U.S. 274 , 91 S.Ct. 1909 , 29 L.Ed.2d 473 (1971); San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon, 359 U.S. 236 , 79 S.Ct. 773 , 3 L.Ed.2d 775 (1959). … The National Labor Relations Board petitioned to intervene and counsel for the Board was heard in argument on November 23, 1971, but the petition was not acted upon by the court.
Cited 5 timesPublishedEdmonds v. Engility Corporation
82 F. Supp. 3d 337 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 6, 2015
Tr. of Karri Brown (“Brown Dep.”) at 10, 18–19. The company combined the accounting systems of each business segment into one centralized time and expense system called Unanet. Nemmers Dep. at 16–23. … Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 255 (1986); George v. Leavitt, 407 F.3d 405, 413 (D.C. Cir. 2005). B.
Cited 4 timesPublished883 F. Supp. 2d 233 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 13, 2012
See Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002); Kowal, 16 F.3d at 1276. … Rubke v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Aug 1, 2018
Kappos v. … The Board found that Mr.
Cited 0 timesPublishedGuam Industrial Services, Inc. v. Rumsfeld
405 F. Supp. 2d 16 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 19, 2005
Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 64, 67 (D.C.Cir.2003); Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C.Cir.2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . … Food & Drug Admin. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120 , 120 S.Ct. 1291 , 146 L.Ed.2d 121 (2000); S. Calif. Edison, 195 F.3d at *20 23. In addition, the court may look to legislative history.
Cited 4 timesPublishedWhite v. Department of Homeland Security
District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 10, 2012
WHITE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 11-2257(CKK) DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, et al., Defendants. … The Board of Immigration Appeals---the agency that took the action Plaintiffs now challenge---is a component of the Department of Justice, not the Department of Homeland Security. E.g., I.N.S. v.
Cited 0 timesPublished316 F. Supp. 1081 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 31, 1970
Commanding Officer, 403 F.2d 371 (2nd Cir. 1968), cert, denied 394 U.S. 929 , 89 S.Ct. 1195 , 22 L.Ed.2d 460 (1969); Fox v. Brown, 402 F.2d 837 (2nd Cir. 1968); Wasson v. … Justice Harlan wrote, concurring in Board of Education of Central School Dist. No. 1 v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedWinstead v. Emc Mortgage Corporation
District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 22, 2010
Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 64, 67 (D.C. Cir. 2003); Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C. Cir. 2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242. … Warren v. District of Columbia, 353 F.3d 36, 40 (D.C. Cir. 2004); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242. “Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements, do not suffice.”
Cited 0 timesPublished790 F. Supp. 29 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 4, 1992
See Webster v. Doe, 486 U.S. 592 , 108 S.Ct. 2047 , 100 L.Ed.2d 632 (1988); see e.g., Heaney v. U.S. Veterans Administration, 756 F.2d 1215 (5th Cir.1985). … See Doe v. Hampton, 566 F.2d 265, 271-272 (D.C.Cir.1977).
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna