Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersdcd

10,000+ results

1.06s

  • Daleandro v. Dalton

    948 F. Supp. 95 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 10, 1996

    See id. at 29, citing United States v. Harper, 22 M.J. 157, 162-63 (CMA 1986); United States v. Ford, 23 M.J. 331, 332-35 (CMA 1987). The matter came to a head administratively before the Secretary’s delegate. … Similarly, I considered, but did not find dispositive the administrative discharge board’s finding.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Luckey v. Hegseth

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 29, 2026

    Daim- lerChrysler Corp. v. Cuno, 547 U.S. 332, 342 (2006). … Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 335 (1976).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Leach v. Mnuchin

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 8, 2022

    In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 756 F.3d 754, 757 (D.C. … Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391, 403 (1976).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hyatt v. Matal

    District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 1, 2018

    Kappos v. … The Board found that Mr.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Reaves v. Dep't of Corr.

    392 F. Supp. 3d 195 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 30, 2019

    Brown v. Plata , 563 U.S. 493 , 510, 131 S.Ct. 1910 , 179 L.Ed.2d 969 (2011). The Eighth Amendment, which prohibits "cruel and unusual punishment," U.S. Const. amend. … Brown , 563 U.S. at 511 , 131 S.Ct. 1910 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • In re Certain Carriers Represented by Eastern, Western & Southeastern Carriers' Conference Committees

    253 F. Supp. 532 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 28, 1966

    Only recently the Supreme Court held that an award of the National Adjustment Board is not only final and binding but may be enforced judicially, Gunther v. … The Court might add that the case of Republic Steel Corp. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Wells v. Gray

    17 F. Supp. 3d 27 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 18, 2014

    S(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 66l, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Calzfano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). The plaintiff is a resident of Washington, D.C. who purports to sue Mayor Vincent Gray.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Thompson v. Washington Mutual

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 25, 2010

    and this order upon the three newly added Defendants: 24 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, JP Morgan Chase Bank, and US Bank. 25 Dated: June 24, 2010 26 PATRICIA V. … 4 Henderson, NV 89009 5 Aster Kifle-Thompson Post Office Box 92214 6 Henderson, NV 89009 7 /s/ Donna Kirchner for 8 MARTHA BROWN

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. Valderrama Carvajal

    924 F. Supp. 2d 219 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 20, 2013

    See United States v. … Another court primarily addressed due process, but that court’s conclusion relied on the premise that MDLEA applies to conspirators not on board the vessel. See United States v. Medjuck, 937 F.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Marcello v. Attorney General of the United States

    347 F. Supp. 898 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 27, 1972

    Marcello v. INS, C.A.5, 1971, 449 F.2d 349 . … Plaintiff’s citation of Foti v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Independent Union of Flight Attendants v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.

    502 F. Supp. 1013 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 29, 1980

    See United Industrial Workers of the Seafarers, etc. v. Board of Trustees of the Galveston Wharves, 351 F.2d 183, 190 (5th Cir. 1965) (“Galveston Wharves”). … Primary jurisdiction to decide the merits of such a dispute resides in the Adjustment Board. See, e. g., National Brotherhood of Elec. Wkrs. v. Washington Term.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Pinzon v. United States Department of Justice

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 3, 2026

    Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 669 (D.C. Cir. 2004) (cleaned up). … See Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). The complaint’s rambling contents appear to allege wrongdoing by the U.S.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Uab Skyroad Leasing v. Ojsc Tajik Air

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 26, 2021

    Ltd. v. Nat’l Port Auth., 680 F.3d 805, 814 (D.C. Cir. 2012); see also First Nat’l City Bank v. … See Board Article. Thus, the officials who run the Tajik government run the Supervisory Board.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Alexander v. Amtrak

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 1, 2026

    P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668–71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Notably, “[a] confused . . . narrative of charges and conclusions . . . does not comply with the requirements of Rule 8.” Cheeks v. Fort Myer Constr. Corp., 71 F.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. Sutton

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 20, 2022

    Hylton-Brown. See United States v. Sutton, Criminal No. 21-0598, 2022 WL 1202741, at *11-12 (D.D.C. Apr. 22, 2022). Mr. … Hylton- Brown in his police vehicle. See Jennings v. United States, 993 A.2d at 1080; see also United States v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Delaware Riverkeeper Network v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

    243 F. Supp. 3d 141 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 22, 2017

    Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). In order to survive a motion to dismiss, a complaint must contain factual allegations that are “enough to raise a right to relief above the speculative level.” … Berryhill, 411 U.S. 564, 578 (1973) (finding state optometry board unconstitutionally biased because, as private practitioners, 18 board members had a pecuniary interest

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Kar v. Rumsfeld

    580 F. Supp. 2d 80 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 26, 2008

    Reid v. Covert, 354 U.S. 1, 5-6 , 77 S.Ct. 1222 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1148 (1957) (plurality); see also United States v. … The differences between such a proceeding and a Detainee Status Board in Baghdad are obvious.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Untalasco v. Lockheed Martin Corporation

    249 F. Supp. 3d 318 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 18, 2017

    Oladokun v. Corr. Treatment Facility, 309 F.R.D. 94, 98 (D.D.C. 2015) (quoting Eberhardt v. Brown, 580 F. App’x 490, 491 (7th Cir. 2014)); see also United States v. … DATE: April 18, 2017 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • United States v. Sanchez

    917 F. Supp. 29 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 23, 1996

    In Brown , the D.C. … See United States v. Hall, 854 F.2d 1269, 1271 (11th Cir.1988); United States v. Brown, 587 F.2d 187, 189 (5th Cir.1979); 3 Charles A. Wright, Federal Practice and Procedure: Criminal §§ 552, 558 n. 1 (2d ed.1982).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Richard v. Bell Atlantic Corp.

    165 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 14, 2001

    See Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446 (D.C.Cir.1999). In Brown , the D.C. … Circuit reinforced the scope of its Brown decision in admonishing a district court that it had “read our decision in Brown too broadly .... [I]t is not enough to ask whether the transfer was purely lateral.

    Cited 3 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.