Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
7.85s
Missouri Department of Social Services v. Department of Health and Human Services
District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 13, 2019
Supp. 2d 60, 66 n.3 (D.D.C. 2006)); see also Cement Kiln Recycling Coal. v. EPA, 255 F.3d 855, 869 (D.C. … See Board Decision at 14–15.
Cited 0 timesPublished680 F. Supp. 33 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 23, 1988
Block v. Community Nutrition Institute, 467 U.S. 340, 351 , 104 S.Ct. 2450, 2456 , 81 L.Ed.2d 270 (1984). Such intent is fairly discernible here. … Patlex Corp v. Mossinghoff, 585 F.Supp. 713 (E.D.Pa.1983), aff’d in part and vacated in part, 758 F.2d 594 (Fed.Cir.1985) on reh'g in part, 771 F.2d 480 (Fed.Cir.1985).
Cited 1 timesPublished271 F. Supp. 2d 49 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 21, 2002
The scoring system created by the 1987 guidelines merely formalized the method by which the Board exercised its considerable discretion to grant parole. Davis v. Henderson, 652 A.2d 634 (D.C.1995). … Hackett v. United States Parole Comm’n, 851 F.2d 127, 130 (6th Cir.1987) (quoting Solomon v. Elsea,, 676 F.2d 282, 290 (7th Cir.1982)); Gambino v. Morris, 134 F.3d 156, 160 (3rd Cir.1998); Bridge v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Mar 2, 2012
Buesgens v. Brown, 567 F. Supp. 2d 26, 31 (D.D.C. 2008). Accordingly, to establish personal jurisdiction over a defendant, the plaintiff must allege specific acts connecting the defendant with the forum. Id. … Compare Azmar v. Stern, 662 F.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Nov 5, 2025
P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 677–79 (2009). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Nov 5, 2025
P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 677–79 (2009). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).
Cited 0 timesPublished474 F. Supp. 90 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 23, 1979
United States v. Cross, 170 F.Supp. 303 (D.D.C.1959); United States v. Thayer, 214 F.Supp. 929 (D.Colo. 1963); United States v. Icardi, 140 F.Supp. 383 (D.D.C.1956); Brown v. United States, 245 F.2d 549 (8th Cir. 1957). … In Brown v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedFerguson v. Local 689, Amalgamated Transit Union
District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 21, 2010
Noble v. USPS, 537 F. Supp. 2d. 210, 216 (D.D.C. 2008); Watkins v. Commc'ns Workers of Am., 736 F. Supp. 1156, 1161 (D.D.C. 1990). … Dutrisac v.
Cited 0 timesPublished616 F. Supp. 1540 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 13, 1985
Teamsters v. U.S., 431 U.S. 324 , 335 n. 15, 97 S.Ct. 1843 , 1854 n. 15, 52 L.Ed.2d 396 (1977). 3. … Hazelwood School District v. United States, 433 U.S. 299, 307-08 , 97 S.Ct. 2736, 2741-42 , 53 L.Ed.2d 768 (1977). 8.
Cited 5 timesPublishedStryker Spine v. Biedermann Motech GmbH
750 F. Supp. 2d 107 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 15, 2010
See Eli Lilly & Co. v. … See Muniauction, Inc. v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · May 1, 2009
Board proceeding. … See Kreis v. Sec’y of Air Force, 866 F.2d 1508, 1511 (D.C. Cir. 1989). It is established that military records correction boards’ decisions are subject to judicial review under the APA. See Dickson v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedL. J. Christopher Co. of California v. Commissioner
55 F.2d 532 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 14, 1931
Christopher Co. of Delaware v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (No. 5236) 60 App. D. C. 368, 55F.(2d) 530, this day decided. … The board has determined that appellant did not successfully sustain this burden and, in view of the testimony of the two witnesses introduced by appellant on this question, we are not prepared to say that the board was unreasonable
Cited 1 timesPublished333 F. Supp. 1283 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 18, 1971
See Retail Clerks Union, Local 648, et al. v. Retail Clerks International Ass’n, et al., 299 F.Supp. 1012, 1022 (D.C.Cir. 1969). Also Bakery and Confectionery Workers International Union of America v. … Additionally, with due respect for the judgment of the Labor Department, it is clear under the doctrine of Wirtz v.
Modified on other grounds by Cefalo v. Moffett, 449 F.2d 1193 (1971)Cited 8 timesPublished284 F. Supp. 2d 96 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2003
Pro-Football v. … Filter Corp. v.
Reversed on other grounds by Pro Ftbl Inc v. Harjo, Suzan, 415 F.3d 44 (2005)Cited 50 timesPublishedAffinity Healthcare Services, Inc. v. Sebelius
District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 25, 2010
Co. v. … See Wilcox v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2025
Virginia’s Chapter 35, articles for substance abuse counselors (§ 54.1-3507.1), and guidance document 115-11 from the Board of Counseling, also outline the scope of practice for those regulated by the Board. Id. ¶ 9. … P. 12(b)(6); Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002).
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Oct 27, 2009
Morton, 134 F.3d 109, 112 (3d Cir.1998); Brown v. Angelone, 150 F.3d 370, 374-75 (4th Cir.1998); United States v. … Flores, 135 F.3d 1000, 1006 (5th Cir.1998); Brown v, O’Dea, 187 F.3d 572, 576-77 (6th Cir.1999); O’Connor v. United States, 133 F.3d 548, 550 (7th Cir.1998); Moore v.
Cited 0 timesPublished391 F. Supp. 2d 210 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 28, 2005
Brown, v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452-53 (D.C.Cir.1999). Under the burden-shifting framework of McDonnell Douglas v. … Bowie v. Ashcroft, 283 F. Supp 2d 25, 33 (D.D.C.2003) (quoting Brown, 199 F.3d at 457 ).
Cited 56 timesPublishedWells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. J.B. Froe Properties, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 23, 2015
[Dkt. 15] (as to Sonja Watson), [Dkt. 16] (as to Olga DeBerry Brown), [Dkt. 17] (as to D.C. … See Hopkins v. Women’s Div., Gen. Bd. Of Global Ministries, 284 F.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Apr 14, 2026
Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 669 (D.C. Cir. 2004) (cleaned up). … See Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Plaintiff brings this civil action against the City of Pasadena, Texas. See Compl. at 2. The nature of plaintiff’s legal claims is unclear.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna