Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersdcd

10,000+ results

6.65s

  • Simens v. Reno

    960 F. Supp. 6 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 24, 1997

    Kempcke v. Monsanto Co., 945 F.Supp. 193, 197 (E.D.Mo.1996); Skinner v. Brown, 951 F.Supp. 1307, 1314-15 (S.D.Tex.1996). Age difference is what is probative, not class membership in the ADEA context. … In Hartsel v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Lakner v. United States Department of Defense

    District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 15, 2010

    Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 511 U.S. 375, 377 (1994). … Army Medical Command Medical Appeals Board. Id. ¶ 10.10(d), (f). The Board reviews the appeal and makes a recommendation to The Army Surgeon General. Id.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Patlex Corp. v. Quigg

    680 F. Supp. 33 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 23, 1988

    Block v. Community Nutrition Institute, 467 U.S. 340, 351 , 104 S.Ct. 2450, 2456 , 81 L.Ed.2d 270 (1984). Such intent is fairly discernible here. … Patlex Corp v. Mossinghoff, 585 F.Supp. 713 (E.D.Pa.1983), aff’d in part and vacated in part, 758 F.2d 594 (Fed.Cir.1985) on reh'g in part, 771 F.2d 480 (Fed.Cir.1985).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Barnard v. Poteat

    271 F. Supp. 2d 49 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 21, 2002

    The scoring system created by the 1987 guidelines merely formalized the method by which the Board exercised its considerable discretion to grant parole. Davis v. Henderson, 652 A.2d 634 (D.C.1995). … Hackett v. United States Parole Comm’n, 851 F.2d 127, 130 (6th Cir.1987) (quoting Solomon v. Elsea,, 676 F.2d 282, 290 (7th Cir.1982)); Gambino v. Morris, 134 F.3d 156, 160 (3rd Cir.1998); Bridge v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Caldwell v. Romero

    District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 2, 2012

    Buesgens v. Brown, 567 F. Supp. 2d 26, 31 (D.D.C. 2008). Accordingly, to establish personal jurisdiction over a defendant, the plaintiff must allege specific acts connecting the defendant with the forum. Id. … Compare Azmar v. Stern, 662 F.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • West v. Bost

    District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 5, 2025

    P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 677–79 (2009). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • West v. Berman

    District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 5, 2025

    P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 677–79 (2009). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. Profeta

    District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 27, 2009

    Morton, 134 F.3d 109, 112 (3d Cir.1998); Brown v. Angelone, 150 F.3d 370, 374-75 (4th Cir.1998); United States v. … Flores, 135 F.3d 1000, 1006 (5th Cir.1998); Brown v, O’Dea, 187 F.3d 572, 576-77 (6th Cir.1999); O’Connor v. United States, 133 F.3d 548, 550 (7th Cir.1998); Moore v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cefalo v. Moffett

    333 F. Supp. 1283 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 18, 1971

    See Retail Clerks Union, Local 648, et al. v. Retail Clerks International Ass’n, et al., 299 F.Supp. 1012, 1022 (D.C.Cir. 1969). Also Bakery and Confectionery Workers International Union of America v. … Additionally, with due respect for the judgment of the Labor Department, it is clear under the doctrine of Wirtz v.

    Modified on other grounds by Cefalo v. Moffett, 449 F.2d 1193 (1971)Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Ferguson v. Local 689, Amalgamated Transit Union

    District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 21, 2010

    Noble v. USPS, 537 F. Supp. 2d. 210, 216 (D.D.C. 2008); Watkins v. Commc'ns Workers of Am., 736 F. Supp. 1156, 1161 (D.D.C. 1990). … Dutrisac v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Beck v. United States Government

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 9, 2018

    Its Board of Regents is the governing body, see 20 U.S.C. § 42(a), to which Secretary David J. Skorton reports, see 20 U.S.C. § 46. … Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Pro-Football, Inc. v. Harjo

    284 F. Supp. 2d 96 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2003

    Pro-Football v. … Filter Corp. v.

    Reversed on other grounds by Pro Ftbl Inc v. Harjo, Suzan, 415 F.3d 44 (2005)Cited 50 timesPublished
  • Stryker Spine v. Biedermann Motech GmbH

    750 F. Supp. 2d 107 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 15, 2010

    See Eli Lilly & Co. v. … See Muniauction, Inc. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Escobar v. Known by the U.S.

    District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 27, 2025

    Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quotations omitted). … See Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). The Court dismisses the complaint for the simple reason that there are no factual allegations supporting an actual legal claim.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Charlton v. Wynne

    District Court, District of Columbia · May 1, 2009

    Board proceeding. … See Kreis v. Sec’y of Air Force, 866 F.2d 1508, 1511 (D.C. Cir. 1989). It is established that military records correction boards’ decisions are subject to judicial review under the APA. See Dickson v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Affinity Healthcare Services, Inc. v. Sebelius

    District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 25, 2010

    Co. v. … See Wilcox v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re Certain Carriers Represented by Eastern, Western & Southeastern Carriers' Conference Committees

    253 F. Supp. 532 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 28, 1966

    Only recently the Supreme Court held that an award of the National Adjustment Board is not only final and binding but may be enforced judicially, Gunther v. … The Court might add that the case of Republic Steel Corp. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Shannon v. Bhg Holdings, LLC

    District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2025

    Virginia’s Chapter 35, articles for substance abuse counselors (§ 54.1-3507.1), and guidance document 115-11 from the Board of Counseling, also outline the scope of practice for those regulated by the Board. Id. ¶ 9. … P. 12(b)(6); Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Pinzon v. United States Department of Justice

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 3, 2026

    Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 669 (D.C. Cir. 2004) (cleaned up). … See Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). The complaint’s rambling contents appear to allege wrongdoing by the U.S.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Runkle v. Gonzales

    391 F. Supp. 2d 210 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 28, 2005

    Brown, v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452-53 (D.C.Cir.1999). Under the burden-shifting framework of McDonnell Douglas v. … Bowie v. Ashcroft, 283 F. Supp 2d 25, 33 (D.D.C.2003) (quoting Brown, 199 F.3d at 457 ).

    Cited 56 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.