Case law

Alberts v. Tuft (In Re Greater Southeast Community Hospital Corp.)

333 B.R. 506 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 31, 2005

Kittay v. Atlantic Bank of New York (In re Global Serv. Group, LLC), 316 B.R. 451, 456 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y. 2004) (quoting Schacht v. Brown, 711 F.2d 1343, 1350 (7th Cir.1983)). … They claim that under Browning v. Levy, 283 F.3d 761 (6th Cir.2002), and D & K Properties Crystal Lake v. Mut. Life Ins.

Skelly Oil Co. v. Udall

288 F. Supp. 109 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 31, 1968

V. … Hamlin Testing Laboratories, Inc. v. United States Atomic Energy Commission, 6 Cir., 357 F.2d 632 .

R. R. v. Department of the Army

482 F. Supp. 770 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 15, 1980

See Schuler v. Department of State, No. 78-1797 (D.C.Cir. Sept. 7, 1979) (slip op. at 9-10), vacated on other grounds (Jan. 9,1980); White v. … See generally Johnson v. Robison, 415 U.S. 361 , 94 S.Ct. 1160 , 39 L.Ed.2d 389 (1974); Cunningham v. United States, 549 F.2d 753 (Ct.Cl.1977).

Feezor v. Babbitt

953 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 20, 1996

The Community appealed the disapproval of the first and second adoption ordinances to the Interior Board of Indian Appeals. … United Food & Commercial Workers Union Local 751 v. Brown Group, Inc., — U.S. -, -, 116 S.Ct. 1529, 1533 , 134 L.Ed.2d 758 (1996). Plaintiffs in this case easily satisfy these requirements.

United States v. Seefried

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 29, 2022

Brown v. … Brown e clearly requires it . ” { Cohen v.

Daye v. Tobacco Workers International Union

234 F. Supp. 815 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 2, 1964

To date, the National Labor Relations Board has not acted upon these charges. Local 208 has exhausted its intraunion remedies. … Perry v. Perry, 88 U.S.App.D.C. 337 , 190 F.2d 601 (1951).

Jericho Baptist Church Ministries, Inc. v. Jericho Baptist Church Ministries, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 8, 2020

See Pyne v. … Elliott v.

St. Marys Regional Medical Center v. Xavier Becerra

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 20, 2024

V. … The “inextricably intertwined” motif on which the Board and the Secretary both rely originates with Texas Alliance for Home Care Services v. Sebelius, 811 F.

Fleming v. Cherokee Nation

District Court, District of Columbia · May 31, 2019

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA RHONDA LEONA BROWN FLEMING, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 19-1397 (TFH) v. THE CHEROKEE NATION, et al. Defendants. … .”); Tanner-Brown v. Zinke, 709 F. App’x. 17, 20 (D.C. Cir. 2017) (affirming district court denial of standing to the Harvest Institute based on a similar description of its membership).

Jones v. United States

376 F. Supp. 13 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 17, 1974

Recently, in January of this Term, the Supreme Court gave recognition to that principle in the case of Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleur, 414 U.S. 632 , 94 S.Ct. 791 , 39 L.Ed.2d 52 (1974). … In so doing, it reversed Cohen v. Chesterfield County School Board, 474 F.2d 395 (4th Cir. 1973) (en banc) on the due process question.

Abdulla v. University of Arkansas at Little Rock

930 F. Supp. 2d 138 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 18, 2013

Moor v. Alameda County, 411 U.S. 693, 717 (citing Postal Tel. Cable Co. v. Alabama, 155 U.S. 482 (1894)); see also Long v. District of Columbia, 820 F.2d 409, 412-13 (D.C. … See Greenwood v. Ross, 778 F.2d 448, 449 n.1 (8th Cir. 1985) (“Arkansas state law designates the Board of Trustees of the University of Arkansas as the entity capable of being sued.”). Since Mr.

Franks v. Salazar

751 F. Supp. 2d 62 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 5, 2010

Brown, Charles F. Robbins, Jesse R. … Brown each sport-hunted at least one African elephant in Mozambique.

Harrell v. Tobriner

279 F. Supp. 22 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 4, 1968

Tobriner, individually and as President of the Board of Commissioners of the District of Columbia; John B. Duncan and Robert E. … Mathe, individually and as members of the Board of Commissioners of the District of Columbia; Winifred G.

Smith v. the U.S. Equal Employment Oppportunity Commission

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 17, 2016

See Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 152 (D.C. Cir. 2015). … See Scheuer v.

Uzoukwu v. Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments

845 F. Supp. 2d 168 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 28, 2012

Board of 4 Other judges on this court handled Plaintiff’s IFP application and her motion for reconsideration. … (citing Baldwin County Welcome Center v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 151 (1984)).

Kalu v. Internal Revenue Service

159 F. Supp. 3d 16 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 1, 2016

Responsibility, 740 F.3d at 205 (quoting Mayer Brown LLP v. IRS, 562 F.3d 1190, 1193 (D.C.Cir.2009)). … See Morley v.

Brian Ruud International v. United States

733 F. Supp. 396 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 21, 1989

And decisions by corporations whose Boards of Directors are dominated by one person to this degree are subject to more careful scrutiny than are others. Basic Unit Ministry v. … Defendant cites Basic Unit Ministry v.

Shurtleff v. City of Bos.

337 F. Supp. 3d 66 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 29, 2018

In considering the design, the Board sought public comments. Id. at 2245 . … Brown , 447 U.S. 455 , 100 S.Ct. 2286 , 65 L.Ed.2d 263 (1980), in which the plaintiffs prevailed on claims of speech-related Equal Protection violations.

Intex Recreation Corporation v. Team Worldwide Corporation

42 F. Supp. 3d 80 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 24, 2013

(citing Brown v. 3M, 265 F.3d 1349, 1352 (Fed. Cir. 2001)); see, e.g., Acumed LLC v. Stryker Corp., 483 F.3d 800, 805 (Fed. Cir. 2007) (construing the term “curved”). underlying claims); Shuffle Master, Inc. v. … The plaintiff patent-owner asserted that the term “board” in one claim should not be limited to conventional wood boards, in light of language in other claims referring to a “wood decking board.” Nystrom v.

United States v. Hubbard

474 F. Supp. 90 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 23, 1979

United States v. Cross, 170 F.Supp. 303 (D.D.C.1959); United States v. Thayer, 214 F.Supp. 929 (D.Colo. 1963); United States v. Icardi, 140 F.Supp. 383 (D.D.C.1956); Brown v. United States, 245 F.2d 549 (8th Cir. 1957). … In Brown v.