Case law

Segar v. Ashcroft

277 F.R.D. 9 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 26, 2011

Segal v. Mukasey, 508 F.3d 16, 28 (D.C. Cir. 2007). … Segar v. Civiletti, 508 F. Supp. 690, 715 (D.D.C. 1981), aff’d in relevant part sub nom. Segar v. Smith, 738 F.2d 1249 (D.C. Cir. 1984).

Patlex Corp. v. Quigg

680 F. Supp. 33 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 23, 1988

Block v. Community Nutrition Institute, 467 U.S. 340, 351 , 104 S.Ct. 2450, 2456 , 81 L.Ed.2d 270 (1984). Such intent is fairly discernible here. … Patlex Corp v. Mossinghoff, 585 F.Supp. 713 (E.D.Pa.1983), aff’d in part and vacated in part, 758 F.2d 594 (Fed.Cir.1985) on reh'g in part, 771 F.2d 480 (Fed.Cir.1985).

Amin v. Nyack School of Adult & Distance Education

710 F. Supp. 2d 80 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 7, 2010

See Kowal v. MCI Communications Corp., 16 F.3d at 1276 ; Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). III. … See Squires v. Brown, 604 F.Supp.2d 236, 238 (D.D.C.2009) (citing Park v. Arnott, Civil Action No. 89-3257(RCL), 1992 WL 184521 , *4 (D.D.C. July 14,1992)). Amin has not made such a showing.

Short v. Reilly

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 7, 2010

V & XIV).) Plaintiff’s complaint sought a new parole hearing and determination based on the D.C. Parole Board’s 1987 Regulations and 1991 Policy Guideline. (Id. at 18.) … Lynce v. Mathis, 519 U.S. 433, 441 (1997) (quoting Weaver v. Graham, 450 U.S. 24, 29 (1981)).

Shannon v. Bhg Holdings, LLC

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2025

Virginia’s Chapter 35, articles for substance abuse counselors (§ 54.1-3507.1), and guidance document 115-11 from the Board of Counseling, also outline the scope of practice for those regulated by the Board. Id. ¶ 9. … P. 12(b)(6); Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002).

United States v. Valderrama Carvajal

924 F. Supp. 2d 219 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 20, 2013

See United States v. … Another court primarily addressed due process, but that court’s conclusion relied on the premise that MDLEA applies to conspirators not on board the vessel. See United States v. Medjuck, 937 F.

Hunter v. District of Columbia Government

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 15, 2011

But see Brown v. … See Brown v.

McCloskey v. Scrivener

238 F. Supp. 497 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 2, 1965

This Court, acting on its general equity powers and not on any statutory authority, is the only proper forum to review decisions of the Board of Zoning Adjustment. Jarrott et al. v. … See Hagans v. District of Columbia, 97 A.2d 922 (D.C.Mun.App., 1953).

Am. Med. Intern., Inc. v. SEC. of HEW

466 F. Supp. 605 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 2, 1979

See Gosman v. … The Administrator reversed the Board's decision.

Van Bourg v. Nitze

259 F. Supp. 774 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 6, 1966

The plaintiff appealed to the Board for Correction of Naval Records, which affirmed the decision of the Board of Review. … This contention is based upon a decision of the Court of Appeals in Bland v. Connally, 110 U.S.App.D.C. 375 , 293 F.2d 852 .

Conset Corp. v. Community Services Administration

624 F. Supp. 601 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 16, 1985

Gray v. … Old Dominion v. Brown, 471 F.Supp. 300 (D.D.C.1979). The court of appeals reversed and remanded; holding that the plaintiffs may have been entitled to some due process protection. Old Dominion, 631 F.2d at 953 .

Operative Plasterers' & Cement Masons' International Ass'n of the United States & Canada v. Jordan Interiors, Inc.

744 F. Supp. 2d 49 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 22, 2010

Deklewa v. … Areas Pension Fund v.

Haughton v. District of Columbia

161 F. Supp. 3d 100 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 5, 2014

United States v. Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., 284 F.R.D. 22, 30 (D.D.C.2012) (alterations in original) (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 33(d)); see also Franco-Gonzalez v. … Corp. v. MGA Elecs., Inc., 227 F.R.D. 313, 322 (C.D.Cal.2004) (same (collecting cases)); Graske v. Auto-Owners Ins.

Navigators Insurance Company v. Baylor & Jackson, P.L.L.C.

888 F. Supp. 2d 55 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 28, 2012

See Brown Decl., ¶ 12 & Exh. 1-E (Policy), Section 1.A. … See Thomas, et al., v. Brynee K. Baylor, et al., Case No. 24-C- 09-00500 (Cir. Ct., Baltimore City, Md.); see also Brown Decl., ¶13; Rindner Decl., Exh. 3 (Boucree Docket); Exh. 5 (Thomas Docket).

Palmer v. Napolitano

867 F. Supp. 2d 120 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 13, 2012

Browning-Ferris Indus. of Pa., Inc., 691 F.2d 1117 (3d Cir. 1982,] is better suited than Spirides to resolve ‘joint employment’ discrimination cases . . . .” Harris v. Atty. General of U.S., 657 F. … Browning-Ferris addresses situations where the plaintiff may be an employee of two organizations at once. Id. at 1122-23.

Mudd v. Caldera

26 F. Supp. 2d 113 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 29, 1998

See Kreis v. … See Frizelle v. Slater, 111 F.3d at 176 (Board’s decision arbitrary where it failed to address two of petitioner’s non-frivolous arguments); Neal v.

Echenique v. Biden

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 27, 2025

See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).  Plaintiff appears to hold the former President of the United States and others responsible for all manner of harm, from discrimination to false arrest.

Sonitrol of Fresno, Inc. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.

629 F. Supp. 1089 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 6, 1986

Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. at 352 , 63 S.Ct. at 314 . (citations omitted). … Consequently, defendant’s conduct is not immunized under Parker v. Brown. Id. at 1320 (emphasis added).

Richard v. Bell Atlantic Corp.

167 F. Supp. 2d 34 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 14, 2001

See Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446 (D.C.Cir.1999). In Brown , the D.C. … Circuit reinforced the scope of its Brown decision in admonishing a district court that it had “read our decision in Brown too broadly.... [I]t is not enough to ask whether the transfer was purely lateral.

Simens v. Reno

960 F. Supp. 6 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 24, 1997

Kempcke v. Monsanto Co., 945 F.Supp. 193, 197 (E.D.Mo.1996); Skinner v. Brown, 951 F.Supp. 1307, 1314-15 (S.D.Tex.1996). Age difference is what is probative, not class membership in the ADEA context. … In Hartsel v.