Case law

Quailes v. Spencer

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 14, 2023

Ass’n v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 463 U.S. 29, 43 (1983). See Envt'l. Def. Fund, Inc. v. Costle, 657 F.2d 275, 283 (D.C. … Thalasinos v. Harvey, 479 F. Supp. 2d 45, 49 (D.D.C. 2007) (quoting Frizelle v. Slater, 111 F.3d 172, 176 (D.C. Cir. 1997)).

James v. Reno

39 F. Supp. 2d 37 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 11, 1999

Sandin v. Conner, 515 U.S. at 484 , 115 S.Ct. 2293 ; Brown v. Plaut, 131 F.3d 163, 170 (D.C.Cir.1997). … Brandon v. District of Columbia Board of Parole, 823 F.2d 644, 649 (D.C.Cir.1987). Plaintiff has failed to establish that he has been deprived of a liberty interest without due process. 2.

Transamerica Leasing Inc. v. La Republica De Venezuela

21 F. Supp. 2d 47 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 1998

Pain v. … In Rogers v.

Morgan v. United States Parole Commission

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 4, 2014

, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. … /s/ KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge DATE: March 3, 3014 1 At the time plaintiff

Ferguson v. Local 689, Amalgamated Transit Union

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 21, 2010

Noble v. USPS, 537 F. Supp. 2d. 210, 216 (D.D.C. 2008); Watkins v. Commc'ns Workers of Am., 736 F. Supp. 1156, 1161 (D.D.C. 1990). … Dutrisac v.

Awofala v. Central Parking System of Virginia, Inc.

630 F. Supp. 2d 64 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 2, 2009

Similarly, the defendant references the promotion of Allen Brown, a “White American,” id. at 8-9, but also fails to compare his qualifications with Brown’s and doesn’t allude to Brown’s rank at all, see generally id. … See Park v.

Remmie v. Mabus

846 F. Supp. 2d 91 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 5, 2012

See Scheuer v. … For example, some have held that “suit must be filed within six years of the adverse board decision, regardless of whether, or when, an application for reconsideration is filed.” Nihiser v. Marsh, 211 F.

Segar v. Ashcroft

277 F.R.D. 9 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 26, 2011

Segal v. Mukasey, 508 F.3d 16, 28 (D.C. Cir. 2007). … Segar v. Civiletti, 508 F. Supp. 690, 715 (D.D.C. 1981), aff’d in relevant part sub nom. Segar v. Smith, 738 F.2d 1249 (D.C. Cir. 1984).

Patlex Corp. v. Quigg

680 F. Supp. 33 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 23, 1988

Block v. Community Nutrition Institute, 467 U.S. 340, 351 , 104 S.Ct. 2450, 2456 , 81 L.Ed.2d 270 (1984). Such intent is fairly discernible here. … Patlex Corp v. Mossinghoff, 585 F.Supp. 713 (E.D.Pa.1983), aff’d in part and vacated in part, 758 F.2d 594 (Fed.Cir.1985) on reh'g in part, 771 F.2d 480 (Fed.Cir.1985).

Chennareddy v. Dodaro

698 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 18, 2009

v. … See, e.g., Lutes v. Goldin, 62 F.Supp.2d 118, 134 (D.D.C. 1999) (“Courts in this jurisdiction have relied upon Brown [v. GSA, 425 U.S. 820 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976),] and Thorne [v.

Amin v. Nyack School of Adult & Distance Education

710 F. Supp. 2d 80 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 7, 2010

See Kowal v. MCI Communications Corp., 16 F.3d at 1276 ; Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). III. … See Squires v. Brown, 604 F.Supp.2d 236, 238 (D.D.C.2009) (citing Park v. Arnott, Civil Action No. 89-3257(RCL), 1992 WL 184521 , *4 (D.D.C. July 14,1992)). Amin has not made such a showing.

United States v. Trump

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 17, 2023

Id. at 350– 51 (cleaned up); Seattle Times Co. v. … The Circuit Courts in both United States v. Brown and United States v. Ford recognized that First Amendment rights must yield to the imperative of a fair trial. 218 F.3d 415, 424 (2000); 830 F.2d 596, 599 (1987).

McGillvary v. U.S. Department of Education

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 1, 2026

Brown v. FBI, 793 F. Supp. 2d 368, 375 (D.D.C. 2011) (quoting Mendoza v. Dep’t of Justice, No. 89–cv–1979, 1990 WL 116832, at *1 (D.D.C. Aug. 3, 1990); citing WWHT, Inc. v. Fed. … See Brown, 793 F.

Van Bourg v. Nitze

259 F. Supp. 774 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 6, 1966

The plaintiff appealed to the Board for Correction of Naval Records, which affirmed the decision of the Board of Review. … This contention is based upon a decision of the Court of Appeals in Bland v. Connally, 110 U.S.App.D.C. 375 , 293 F.2d 852 .

MacKie v. Clinton

827 F. Supp. 56 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 23, 1993

Mackie v. … Ford) (purpose of § 202(b) is to avoid "vacancies on the Board ... [which] can greatly inhibit the ability of the Board of Governors to perform its functions"). 7 . But see Mackie v. Bush, 809 F.Supp. at 147 . 8 .

University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center v. Leavitt

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 19, 2010

Doyne Hospital v. Johnson, 603 F. … Hosp. v. Johnson, 602 F.

Shannon v. Bhg Holdings, LLC

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2025

Virginia’s Chapter 35, articles for substance abuse counselors (§ 54.1-3507.1), and guidance document 115-11 from the Board of Counseling, also outline the scope of practice for those regulated by the Board. Id. ¶ 9. … P. 12(b)(6); Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002).

United States v. Valderrama Carvajal

924 F. Supp. 2d 219 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 20, 2013

See United States v. … Another court primarily addressed due process, but that court’s conclusion relied on the premise that MDLEA applies to conspirators not on board the vessel. See United States v. Medjuck, 937 F.

Doe v. Department of Defense

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 29, 2024

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … (overruling Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 457 (D.C. Cir. 1999)).

Kyriakopoulos v. George Washington University

657 F. Supp. 1525 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 9, 1987

See Clark v. … See Anderson v.