Case law

United Western Bank v. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency

853 F. Supp. 2d 12 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 24, 2012

They are: (1) an email circulated among FDIC Board Members on November 5, 2010; (2) a Case Memorandum to the FDIC Board dated October 25, 2010, which includes two attachments entitled “Cost Test Summary” and “Resolution … Ass’n v. Office of Thrift Supervision, 934 F.2d 1127, 1136 (10th Cir. 1991); Guaranty Sav. & Loan Ass’n v. Fed. Home Loan Bank Bd., 794 F. 2d 1339, 1342 (8th Cir. 1986); Gibralter Savings v. Ryan, 772 F.

Metroil, Inc. v. Exxonmobil Oil Corporation

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 20, 2010

Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C. Cir. 2003); Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … Corp., 940 A.2d 163 (D.C. 2008), and Holzsager v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, 979 A.2d 52 (D.C. 2009) support the retroactive application of the RSSA. See Pl.’s Opp’n to Def.

United States v. Felt

502 F. Supp. 74 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 28, 1980

Black v. Sheraton Corp., 564 F.2d 531, 543-45 (D.C.Cir.1977); see Jabara v. … Roviaro v. United States, 353 U.S. 53, 62-64 , 77 S.Ct. 623, 628-630 , 1 L.Ed.2d 639 (1957) (informant’s privilege); United States v. Reynolds, 345 U.S. 1 , 73 S.Ct. 528 , 97 L.Ed. 727 (1953) (state secrets); Halkin v.

Lalabekyan v. Vaziri

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 20, 2025

(quoting Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 919 (2011)). … Burnham v.

Gamarra v. Obama

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 29, 2016

See Haz`nes v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 23 7, 239 (D.D.C. l987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. l977).

District Intown Properties Ltd. Partnership v. District of Columbia

23 F. Supp. 2d 30 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 25, 1998

Rather, they assert, pursuant to Lucas v. … Ciampitti v. United States, 22 Cl.Ct. 310, 318 (1991); see also K & K Constr., Inc. v.

Connecticut Dcys v. Dhhs

788 F. Supp. 573 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 18, 1992

In Bowen v. … Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services v.

Central Armature Works, Inc. v. American Motorists Insurance

520 F. Supp. 283 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 13, 1981

Steorts v. American Airlines, 647 F.2d 194, 196 (D.C.Cir.1981). The leading case on the availability of punitive damages in contract actions is Brown v. Coates, 253 F.2d 36 (D.C.Cir.1958). … See Brown v. Coates, 253 F.2d at 39 .

Elmore v. motley/hagood

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 31, 2025

See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v.

Hunter v. Reilly

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 12, 2010

Parole Board Rules . . .. … Powell v. McCormack, 395 U.S. 486, 496 (1969); see Spencer v.

DeVito v. Shultz

300 F. Supp. 381 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 29, 1969

Calhoon v. … a vacancy on the Executive Board.

Palacios v. Modly

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 14, 2020

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). … Johnson v.

Mount v. Napolitano

36 F. Supp. 3d 74 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 10, 2014

(Second ROI at 3; Ex. 3 to Def.’s Mot., Decl. of Dinisha Brown (“Brown Decl.”), ECF No. 7-3, at 2.) … Supp. 2d 158, 178-79 (D.D.C. 2012); Noisette v. Geithner, 693 F. Supp. 2d 60, 65 (D.D.C. 2010) (citation omitted). “A Rule 12(b)(6) motion tests the legal sufficiency of a complaint[.]” Browning v.

Petrozzi v. Bowser

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 2, 2025

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quotations omitted). … See Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Plaintiff alleges that his “cellular device . . . was ‘Phished, Hacked and Compromised,’” Compl. at 3, by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, id.

Villarreal-Dancy v. United States Department of the Air Force

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 27, 2022

Fisher v. Pension Benefit Guar. Corp., 468 F. Supp. 3d 7, 18 (D.D.C. 2020) (quoting Cayuga Nation v. Bernhardt, 374 F. Supp. 3d 1, 9 (D.D.C. 2019)). … But see Code v. McCarthy, 959 F.3d 406, 415 (D.C.

Lattimore v. District of Columbia Municipality

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 11, 2026

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (cleaned up). Thus, the pleader must allege enough facts to permit a court “to infer more than the mere possibility of misconduct.” Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. … See Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). They also assist the court in determining whether it has jurisdiction over the subject matter.

Grigsby v. Thomas

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 31, 2019

See Grigsby v. Thomas, No. 14cv1579, 2014 WL4661195, at *1 (D.D.C. Sept. 19, 2014) (noting Grigsby’s five prior habeas actions); see also Grigsby v. Thomas, No. 15cv1517; Grigsby v. Thomas, No. 16cv1918. … DATE: January 31, 2019 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

United States v. Tavolacci

704 F. Supp. 246 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 22, 1988

Beard indicated at the suppression hearing that he wanted to conduct the canine sniff on the train platform to avoid inconveniencing other travelers boarding the train. … United States v. Brown, 671 F.2d at 587 (footnote omitted) (emphasis added).

United States v. Harrison

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 24, 2020

See United States v. Brown, No. 92-cr-0345, slip op. at 12 (D.D.C. July 2, 2020), ECF No. 93. important mitigation strategy for those who remain incarcerated. See United States v. … See, e.g., United States v. Brown, No. 92-cr-0345, slip op. at 10 (D.D.C. July 2, 2020), ECF No. 93 (“wait and see strategy could prove too late to take preventative action”); United States v.

United States v. Alston

742 F. Supp. 13 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 23, 1990

United States v. Tavolacci, 895 F.2d 1423 (D.C.Cir.1990); United States v, Winston, 892 F.2d 112 (D.C.Cir.1989); United States v. … United States v. Lewis, 728 F.Supp. 784 (D.D.C.1990) (J. Sporkin); United States v. Cothran, 729 F.Supp. 153 (D.D.C.1990) (J. Gesell); United States v. Felder, 732 F.Supp. 204 (D.D.C.1990) (J. Sporkin); United States v.