Case law

United States v. Alston

742 F. Supp. 13 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 23, 1990

United States v. Tavolacci, 895 F.2d 1423 (D.C.Cir.1990); United States v, Winston, 892 F.2d 112 (D.C.Cir.1989); United States v. … United States v. Lewis, 728 F.Supp. 784 (D.D.C.1990) (J. Sporkin); United States v. Cothran, 729 F.Supp. 153 (D.D.C.1990) (J. Gesell); United States v. Felder, 732 F.Supp. 204 (D.D.C.1990) (J. Sporkin); United States v.

Council of Prison Locals v. Howlett

562 F. Supp. 849 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 28, 1983

Switchmen’s Union of North America v. National Mediation Board, 320 U.S. 297, 301 , 64 S.Ct. 95, 97 , 88 L.Ed. 61 (1943). … That the Board may have made an error of fact or law is insufficient; the Board must have acted without statutory authority. Physicians Nat. House Staff Ass’n v.

Bancoult v. McNamara

214 F.R.D. 5 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 10, 2003

On November 12, 2002, the plaintiffs moved for leave to amend their complaint to reinstate DCDM and to add Brown & Root, a subsidiary of Halliburton as defendant parties. … James V. Hurson Assocs., Inc. v. Glickman, 229 F.3d 277, 282-83 (D.C.Cir.2000).

Crum v. United States Parole Commission

814 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 14, 1993

In particular Petitioner believes that the cases of Cosgrove v. Smith, 697 F.2d 1125 (D.C.Cir.1983), and its progeny Cosgrove v. … However, the habeas relief recognized in Morrissey v.

United States v. Felt

502 F. Supp. 74 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 28, 1980

Black v. Sheraton Corp., 564 F.2d 531, 543-45 (D.C.Cir.1977); see Jabara v. … Roviaro v. United States, 353 U.S. 53, 62-64 , 77 S.Ct. 623, 628-630 , 1 L.Ed.2d 639 (1957) (informant’s privilege); United States v. Reynolds, 345 U.S. 1 , 73 S.Ct. 528 , 97 L.Ed. 727 (1953) (state secrets); Halkin v.

Stutler v. Heflin

46 F. Supp. 539 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 25, 1942

West v. Bauduit, 59 App.D.C. 74, 75 , 33 F.2d 370 . … Best v. District of Columbia, 291 U. S. 411, 415 , 54 S.Ct. 487 , 78 L.Ed. 882 ; Gunning v. Cooley, 281 U.S. 90, 94 , 50 S.Ct. 231 , 74 L.Ed. 720 ; Jackson v.

Mason Contractors Ass'n of America v. International Council of Employers of Bricklayers & Allied Craftsmen

853 F. Supp. 515 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 26, 1994

Trust Fund v. … See, e.g., Quad City Builders Ass'n v. Tri City Bricklayers Union No. 7, 431 F.2d 999 (8th Cir.1970); Mobile Mechanical Contractors Ass’n v.

Hobson v. Tobriner

255 F. Supp. 295 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 4, 1966

In this action, plaintiffs name as defendants the current Commissioners of the District of Columbia, the Board of Elections of the District of Columbia, the individual members thereof, and Lyndon B. … Code are unconstitutional; and a designation of an interim Board of Commissioners for the District of Columbia until elections can be held.

Elmore v. motley/hagood

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 31, 2025

See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v.

Stephens v. US Airways Group, Inc.

102 F. Supp. 3d 222 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 30, 2015

Judge Janice Rogers Brown wrote the controlling opinion of the D.C. … Brown found 30-day delay reasonable and J. Henderson found 45-day delay reasonable).

United States v. Smithen

738 F. Supp. 15 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 25, 1990

See United States v. Winston, 892 F.2d 112, 117 (D.C.Cir.1989); United States v. Baskin, 886 F.2d 383, 386-87 (D.C.Cir.1989). … In Schneckloth v.

Washington Area Carpenters' Welfare Fund v. Overhead Door Co.

488 F. Supp. 816 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 22, 1980

See Lewis v. Benedict Coal Corp., 361 U.S. 459 , 80 S.Ct. 489 , 4 L.Ed.2d 442 (1960) (union breached contract by striking); Huge v. … Huge v. Long’s Hauling Co., at 465.

Weems v. Cushwa

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 17, 2021

Parole Board (“Board”) conducted parole hearings for individuals sentenced under the D.C. Code. Bailey v. Fulwood, 793 F.3d 127, 130 (D.C. Cir. 2015). … Price v. Barry, 53 F.3d 369, 370 (D.C. Cir. 1995). And under the 1987 Regulations, “parole is never ‘required after the Board determines that the necessary prerequisites exist.’” Ellis v.

Qualls v. Rumsfeld

357 F. Supp. 2d 274 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 7, 2005

Cinciarelli v. Carter, 662 F.2d 73, 78 (D.C.Cir.1981); Woodrick v. Hungerford, 800 F.2d 1413, 1416 (5th Cir.1986); Pence v. Brown, 627 F.2d 872, 874 (8th Cir.1980); Castle v. … Caldera, 74 F.Supp.2d 4, 8-9 (D.D.C.1999) (citing numerous cases); Brown v.

United States International Trade Commission v. ASAT, Inc.

355 F. Supp. 2d 67 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 1, 2004

FTC v. Browning, 435 F.2d 96, 99-100 (D.C.Cir.1970) (citing United States v. Congress Construction Co., 222 U.S. 199, 203-04 , 32 S.Ct. 44 , 56 L.Ed. 163 (1911)). … See id.; FTC v. Browning, 435 F.2d at 100 ; United States v. Firestone Tire & Rubber, 455 F.Supp. at 1076.

Select Specialty Hospital - Bloomington, Inc. v. Sebelius

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2011

) Civil Case No. 09cv2008 (RJL), Plaintiffs, ) ) consolidated with v. … forth when it expects to be able to address this issue, and it is further 1  ORDERED that within 30 days from the date that the Board makes its determin- ation, the

Bangor & Aroostook Railroad v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen

310 F. Supp. 914 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 16, 1970

On May 12, 1966 the late Judge Alexander Holtzoff entered judgments in these cases, Bangor & Aroostook Railroad v. … In general see Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Akron & B. B. R. Co., supra, 12S U.S.App.D.C. at 59, 385 F.2d at 581 and the opinions of Judge Holtzoff gathered there. . Bangor & A. R. R. v.

Hamrick v. Hoffman

550 F. Supp. 2d 8 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 6, 2008

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). … Hamrick’s blood pressure, allows the Company to provide between-meal snacks on board ship, and fails to support him in his other litigation). When Mr.

Rouf v. Commissioner of Patents & Trademarks

837 F. Supp. 9 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 8, 1993

See e.g., Federal Labs, Inc. v. Barringer Research, Ltd., 696 F.2d 271, 274 (3d Cir.1982). A material fact is one which tends to resolve an issue in the case. See Hahn v. … See Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 248, 106 S.Ct. 2505, 2510 , 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986).

Miller v. Department of Navy

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 27, 2009

Miller v. Dep’t of Navy, 476 F.3d 936, 939 (D.C. Cir. 2007). More specifically, the Secretary was authorized to convene an SSB in cases in which “material unfairness” tainted the promotion selection board’s decision. … Kreis v. Sec’y of the Air Force, 866 F.2d 1508, 1511 (D.C. Cir. 1989); see also Guy v. United States, 608 F.2d 867, 874 (Ct.