Case law

Allen v. District of Columbia

263 F. Supp. 3d 14 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 16, 2017

It finds that the District owes no additional fees or costs in Abraham v. DC, No. 01-cv-27, AC (Clark) v. DC, No. 06-cv-439, Allen v. DC, No. 00-cv-591, Isaac v. DC, No. 00-cv-122, Jones v. … Brown v. Hiatts, 82 U.S. (15 Wall.) 177, 185 , 21 L.Ed. 128 (1872).

Cobell v. Norton

407 F. Supp. 2d 140 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 19, 2005

See also, Brown v. … See, e.g., Pete v. UMW Welf. & Retirement Fund, 517 F.2d 1275 , 1289, 1290 & n. 74 (D.C.Cir.1975) (en banc) (30% reduction); Davis v. Board of School Comm'rs, 526 F.2d 865, 868-69 (5th Cir. 1976); Kane v.

Fox v. District of Columbia

877 F. Supp. 6 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 17, 1995

Hall v. Ford, 856 F.2d 255, 258 (D.C.Cir.1988). … Morton, 33 F.3d 1240 (10th Cir.1994); Glass v. Dachel, 2 F.3d 733 (7th Cir.1993); and Cooper v. Petray, 854 F.2d 301 (8th Cir.1988).

Estate of Grant v. U.S. News & World Report, Inc.

639 F. Supp. 342 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 2, 1986

While it is true that notice will not be imputed to a director simply by virtue of his position if his fellow board members actively concealed information from him, Janigan v. … News and Madana boards of directors.

George Washington University v. District of Columbia

391 F. Supp. 2d 109 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 16, 2005

See, e.g., Kelo v. … V.

Sohm v. Dillon

231 F. Supp. 973 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 10, 1964

This Court is not permitted to sit in judgment on this officer’s fitness for promotion or on the propriety of the action of the promotion board. As stated *975 in Payson v. … The plaintiff urges the recent case of Roberts v. Vance, - F.2d - (D.C.Cir. 1964), in support of his motion.

American Federation of Labor v. Madden

33 F. Supp. 943 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 3, 1940

National Labor Relations Board, 70 App.D.C. 62 , 103 F.2d 933, 936 ) that court held that the certification by the defendants was not an order that could be reviewed by that court, and this action of the Court of Appeals … Utah Idaho Central Railroad Co., 305 U.S. 177 , 59 S.Ct. 160 , 83 L.Ed. 111 ], and in Utah Fuel Co. v.

Greene v. National Head Start Association, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 28, 2009

She was the President of NHSA’s Board of Directors (“Board”) between 1982 and 1986. (Compl. ¶¶ 2, 9.) … Count I alleges that Greene was fired without good cause by a December 2007 action of the Board. Neither side specified where the Board action took place.

Jordan v. D.C. Metropolitan Police Department

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 17, 2019

Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). This complaint fails to meet the pleading standard set forth in Rule 8(a). … See, e.g., Argote v. D.C. Metro. Police Dep't, No. lS-CV-303, 2016 WL 107916, at *2 (D.D.C. Jan. 8, 2016) (“No one can s_ue a constituent agency of the District of Columbia.”) (citations omitted); Allen-Brown v.

Davey v. Fitzsimmons

413 F. Supp. 670 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 22, 1976

Sabolsky v. Budzanoski, 457 F.2d 1245, 1252 (C.A.3, 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 853 , 93 S.Ct. 65 , 34 L.Ed.2d 96 . … See also, Local 107 v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, 65 L.R.R.M. 2265 (D.D.C., 1967).

International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers (Smart) - Transportation Division

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 20, 2020

A district court reached a similar result in Long Island Rail Road Co. v. National Mediation Board, No. 68-C-240, 1968 WL 9313 (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 31, 1968). … Consider CSX Transportation, Inc. v. National Mediation Board, No. CIV.A. 04-0611 (RWR), 2005 WL 2297554 (D.D.C. Aug. 29, 2005)—another case SMART-TD cites.

Howard v. Office of the Chief Administrative Officer of the United States House of Representatives

793 F. Supp. 2d 294 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 24, 2011

See United States v. Rayburn House Office Bldg., Room 2113, Wash., D.C. 20515, 497 F.3d 654, 659-60 (D.C.Cir.2007) (citing Gravel, 408 U.S. at 616 , 92 S.Ct. 2614 ; Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. … Browning stood until 2006, when the D.C. Circuit issued its en banc decision in Fields v. Office of Eddie Bernice Johnson, 459 F.3d 1 .

Otis Elevator Co. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

432 F. Supp. 1089 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 22, 1976

Brown advised Mr. … Peter Brown of WMATA, Plaintiff’s Exhibit # 12.

Spokane, Portland & Seattle Railway Co. v. Order of Railway Conductors & Brakemen

265 F. Supp. 892 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 4, 1967

of Locomotive Engineers v. … until the Board acts.

Singh v. Bowsher

609 F. Supp. 454 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 21, 1984

Postal Service Board of Governors v. Aikens, 460 U.S. 711 , 103 S.Ct. 1478, 1482 , 75 L.Ed.2d 403 (1983). … Postal Service Board of Governors v. Aikens, 103 S.Ct. at 1482 n. 3, this Court concludes that none of the complained of actions were unlawful.

Metroil, Inc. v. Exxonmobil Oil Corporation

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 20, 2010

Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C. Cir. 2003); Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … Corp., 940 A.2d 163 (D.C. 2008), and Holzsager v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, 979 A.2d 52 (D.C. 2009) support the retroactive application of the RSSA. See Pl.’s Opp’n to Def.

Lewis v. Government of the District of Columbia

534 F. Supp. 2d 20 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 22, 2008

Bush v. Butler, 521 F.Supp.2d 63, 70-71 (D.D.C.2007) (citing Owen Equip. & Erection Co. v. Kroger, 437 U.S. 365, 373-74 , 98 S.Ct. 2396 , 57 L.Ed.2d 274 (1978)). … Georgiades v. Martin-Trigona, 729 F.2d 831, 834 (D.C.Cir.1984); see Blackman v. District of Columbia, 355 F.Supp.2d 171, 172-73 (D.D.C.2005).

Hitachi Koki Co., Ltd. v. Doll

620 F. Supp. 2d 4 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 29, 2009

On June 21, 2007, the Board denied rehearing and emphasized that the rejection of Claim 1 was consistent with the Supreme Court’s intervening decision in KSR International Co. v. … However, because plaintiff may not raise new issues that were not presented to the Examiner or the Board, see Hyatt v. Dudas, No. 03-CV-0901, 2005 WL 5569663 , at *5 (D.D.C. Sept. 30, 2005) (citing DeSeversky v.

Smith v. Reilly

604 F. Supp. 2d 124 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2009

The District of Columbia Board of Parole 1. … Cosgrove v. Thornburgh, 703 F.Supp. 995, 997 (D.D.C.1988).

Mykonos v. Dc Government

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 1, 2026

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quotations omitted). … See Brown v.