Case law

Communist Party of United States v. McGrath

96 F. Supp. 47 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 28, 1951

Under United States v. … ." [10] See Rogers v.

Coburn v. McHugh

744 F. Supp. 2d 177 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 29, 2010

Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 , 127 S.Ct. 1955 , 167 L.Ed.2d 929 (2007) (citations omitted); see also Ashcroft v. … Furthermore, when reviewing a decision by a military correction board, a Court must do so under an “unusually deferential application of the ‘arbitrary and capricious’ standard of the APA.” Musengo v.

Evergreen Equity Trust v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n

503 F. Supp. 2d 25 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 31, 2007

V. … See Paracor Fin., Inc. v. Gen. Elec. Capital Corp., 96 F.3d 1151 , 1161 (9th Cir.1996); Brown v. Enstar Group, Inc., 84 F.3d 393, 396 (11th Cir.1996); Harrison v.

Winner International Royalty Corp. v. Ching-Rong Wang

11 F. Supp. 2d 18 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 12, 1998

Wang v. Wu, Interference No. 102,654 (July 19, 1996). … See, e.g., Kahn v. General Motors Corp., 135 F.3d 1472, 1479 (Fed.Cir.1998). As the Supreme Court enunciated in United States v.

Georgetown University Hospital v. Bowen

698 F. Supp. 290 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 29, 1988

(“PRRB” or “the Board”). … V.

United States Ex Rel. Barko v. Halliburton Co.

75 F. Supp. 3d 532 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 18, 2014

And Plaintiff Barko alleges American citizens paid the cost of 9/ The Defendants include Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc., Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., KBR Technical Services, Inc., Kellogg Brown & Root … Fusari v.

McKinney v. Birch

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 1, 2026

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quotations omitted). … See Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). 1  The Court understands plaintiff to claim ownership of real property.

McKeeman v. Famelmers

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 1, 2026

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quotations omitted). … See Brown v.

Wachovia Bank and Trust Company, NA v. Buchanan

346 F. Supp. 665 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 30, 1972

Pennsylvania v. Board of Directors, 353 U.S. 230 , 77 S.Ct. 806 , 1 L.Ed.2d 792 (1957); Shelley v. Kraemer, 334 U.S. 1 , 68 S.Ct. 836 , 92 L.Ed. 1161 (1948). … In Noel v.

Saunders v. Berryhill

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 5, 2020

Public Schools system, where she helped children with special needs to board and exit the school bus each day. A.R. at 44, 308-09, 339. … The District Court must affirm an ALJ’s decision that is supported by “substantial evidence” in the record. 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); Brown v. Bowen, 794 F.2d 703, 705 (D.C. Cir. 1986).

Myvett v. Williams

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 3, 2009

Brown v. Armstrong, 949 F.2d 1007, 1011 (8th Cir. 1991). b. … Brown v. Gen. Servs. Admin., 425 U.S. 820, 829 (1976).

Hinton v. Metropolitan Police Department, Fifth District

726 F. Supp. 875 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 19, 1989

See, e.g., Ray v. District of Columbia, 535 A.2d 868 , 870 n. 2 (D.C.1987) (Fire Department, Board of Police and Fire Surgeons, and Police and Fire Clinic); Turner v. … District of Columbia, 532 A.2d 662, 675 (D.C.1987) (Department of Human Services); Roberson v. District of Columbia Board of Higher Education, 359 A.2d 28 , 31 n. 4 (D.C.1976) (Board of Higher Education); Miller v.

International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Airline Division v. Southern Air, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 28, 2020

The Board’s Jurisdiction to Hear the Company’s Grievance The Board framed the first issue as whether it “ha[d] jurisdiction over the Company’s grievance.” Id.; see Madison Hotel v. Hotel & Rest. … AT & T Techs., Inc. v.

Hessing-Roper v. Commissioner for Patents

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 18, 2025

Stewart Org. v. Ricoh Corp., 487 U.S. 22, 29 (1988) (quoting Van Dusen v. Barrack, 376 U.S. 612, 622 (1964)). … According to the government, the operative decision is the Board’s denial on rehearing. Mot. Dismiss at 6. But the government does not cite any authority defining what “final Board decision” means.

Gasser v. Ramsey

125 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 10, 2000

Both parties correctly cite Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446 (D.C.Cir.1999), a recent D.C. Circuit opinion addressing this issue. … See Brown, 199 F.3d at 456 -57 (citing Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth, 524 U.S. 742 , 118 S.Ct. 2257 , 141 L.Ed.2d 633 (1998)). V.

de Samala v. United States

183 F. Supp. 601 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 5, 1960

In De Pusana v. … Cole v.

United States v. Weekes

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 13, 2013

United States v. Tann, No. 04-392, 2006 WL 1313334, at *4 (D.D.C. May 12, 2006) (citations omitted). … Date: December 13, 2013 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

Scarborough v. Natsios

190 F. Supp. 2d 5 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 20, 2002

Brown v. GSA, 425 U.S. 820, 832-33 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976). An EEOC regulation governs the time limit for initially filing a discrimination claim with a counselor. … Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 457-58 (D.C.Cir.1999) (poor performance evaluations constitute adverse actions only if they cause objectively tangible harm); see Russell v.

Blocker-Burnette v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 13, 2010

Sanders v. District of Columbia, Civil Action No. 97-1238, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6818 at *5 (Apr. 15, 2002) (quoting Brown v. United States, 742 F. 2d 1498, 1509 (D.C. … Brown v. District of Columbia, 251 F.

McKeeman v. Chaney

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 1, 2026

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quotations omitted). … See Brown v.