Case law

Granheim v. United States

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 16, 2023

Rich v. United States, 369 F. Supp. 3d 263, 273 (D.D.C. 2019) (Hogan, J.) (quoting Sierra Club v. Mainella, 459 F. Supp. 2d 76, 90 (D.D.C. 2006) (Bates, J.)). … He points to Fail v.

Mykonos v. United States

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 16, 2026

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678–79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668- 71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Here, Plaintiff’s bare and ambiguous allegations fall well short of providing sufficient notice of any claim.

Connecticut Department of Children & Youth Services v. Department of Health & Human Services

788 F. Supp. 573 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 18, 1992

Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe, 401 U.S. 402 , 91 S.Ct. 814 , 28 L.Ed.2d 136 (1971); Heckler v. Chaney, 470 U.S. 821 , 105 S.Ct. 1649 , 84 L.Ed.2d 714 (1985). … In Bowen v.

Baumann v. District of Columbia

775 F. Supp. 2d 191 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 8, 2011

Elkins v. District of Columbia, 636 F.Supp.2d 29, 33 (D.D.C. 2009) (citing Brown v. District of Columbia, 514 F.3d 1279, 1285 (D.C.Cir.2008)). … See Atchinson v.

Khan v. Holder

134 F. Supp. 3d 244 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 29, 2015

The Board denied the appeal, explaining that Khan’s jurisdictional argument was “unsupported by any documentation or other evidence.” See Ex. M to Compl. at 90. … Kowal v. MCI Commc’ns Corp., 16 F.3d 1271, 1276 (D.C. Cir. 1994). However, a court need not accept inferences that are not supported by the facts alleged and legal conclusions drawn by plaintiff. See id.; Browning v.

Francis v. Perez

256 F. Supp. 3d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 14, 2017

See Brown, 425 U.S. at 835 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 (Title VII “provides the exclusive judicial remedy for claims of discrimination in federal employment.”); see also Chennareddy v. … .”); Lutes v. Goldin, 62 F.Supp.2d 118, 135-36 (D.D.C. 1999) (relying on Brown “to bar constitutional challenges arising under claims of federal employment discrimination”).

Payne v. Payne

295 F. 970 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 5, 1924

Browning v. Browning, 89 Kan. 98 , 130 Pac. 852 , L. R. A. 1916C, 737, Ann. Cas. 1914C, 1288; Reifschneider v. Reifschneider (1909) 241 Ill. 92 , 89 N. E. 255 ; Cunningham v. Cunningham, 206 N. Y. 341 , 99 N. … Alexander v. Alexander, 36 App. D. C. 78, 84.

White v. Mattis

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 11, 2019

Stewart v. Stackley, 251 F. Supp. 3d 138, 155 (D.D.C. 2017). … Alpharma, Inc. v. Leavitt, 460 F.3d 1, 6 (D.C. Cir. 2006) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted); see also Butte Cty. v. Hogen, 613 F.3d 190, 194 (D.C.

Jsc Transmashholding v. Miller

70 F. Supp. 3d 516 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 6, 2014

Compl., Ex. 2 (Minutes of the Meeting of the Board of Directors held June 7, 2011 (“June 2011 Board Minutes” or “Minutes”)) at 1. … Compl., Ex. 2 (June 2011 Board Minutes) at 1.

Wadelton v. Department of State

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2018

Fenster v. Brown, 617 F.2d 740, 742 (D.C. Cir. 1979). A. … See Fenster v. Brown, 617 F.2d 740, 743 (D.C. Cir. 1979).

Yelverton v. Fox

997 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 1, 2013

The Board has the option to schedule oral arguments and can affirm, modify, remand, or dismiss the charges. The Board then submits its recommendation and the full record to the D.C. Court of Appeals. … Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962).

Winner International Royalty Corp. v. Ching-Rong Wang

11 F. Supp. 2d 18 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 12, 1998

Wang v. Wu, Interference No. 102,654 (July 19, 1996). … See, e.g., Kahn v. General Motors Corp., 135 F.3d 1472, 1479 (Fed.Cir.1998). As the Supreme Court enunciated in United States v.

Hill v. United States Parole Commission

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 2, 2017

Greenholtz v. Inmates of Neb. Penal & Corr. Complex, 442 U.S. 1, 7 (1979) (quoting Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 (1972)). … Supp. 2d 101, 109 (D.D.C. 2008); Cole v. Harrison, 271 F. Supp. 2d 51, 53 (D.D.C. 2002); see Brown-Bey v. Hyman, 649 A.2d 8, 9 (D.C. 1994).

Flying Tigers Oil Co. v. Flying Tigers Line, Inc.

118 F.R.D. 263 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 14, 1988

The Flying Tigers Oil Co., Inc. v. The Flying Tigers Line, Inc., et al, 87 Civ. 7597 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 29, 1987). For present purposes we need only state the following salient facts of this old and unusual case. … In the ensuing seven years the Trademark Trial and Appeals Board (“Trademark Board” or “Board”) concerned itself with applications submitted by the other named plaintiffs in this action requesting permission to intervene

Communist Party of United States v. McGrath

96 F. Supp. 47 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 28, 1951

Under United States v. … ." [10] See Rogers v.

Myvett v. Williams

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 3, 2009

Brown v. Armstrong, 949 F.2d 1007, 1011 (8th Cir. 1991). b. … Brown v. Gen. Servs. Admin., 425 U.S. 820, 829 (1976).

Coburn v. McHugh

744 F. Supp. 2d 177 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 29, 2010

Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 , 127 S.Ct. 1955 , 167 L.Ed.2d 929 (2007) (citations omitted); see also Ashcroft v. … Furthermore, when reviewing a decision by a military correction board, a Court must do so under an “unusually deferential application of the ‘arbitrary and capricious’ standard of the APA.” Musengo v.

Friends for All Children, Inc. v. Lockheed Aircraft Corp.

587 F. Supp. 180 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 27, 1984

Jaffee v. … Brown, 198 F.Supp. 78 (D.Hawaii 1961) (collateral source rule bars consideration of medical expense reimbursement by public agency of a Canadian province), aff'd sub nom. Brown v.

Georgetown University Hospital v. Bowen

698 F. Supp. 290 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 29, 1988

(“PRRB” or “the Board”). … V.

United States Ex Rel. Barko v. Halliburton Co.

75 F. Supp. 3d 532 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 18, 2014

And Plaintiff Barko alleges American citizens paid the cost of 9/ The Defendants include Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc., Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., KBR Technical Services, Inc., Kellogg Brown & Root … Fusari v.