Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersdcd

10,000+ results

6.29s

  • MacKay v. Hoffman

    403 F. Supp. 467 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 4, 1975

    Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Ass’n v. FPC, 104 U.S.App.D.C. 106 , 259 F.2d 921 (1958), Murray v. Kunzig, 149 U.S.App.D.C. 256 , 462 F.2d 871 (1972), rev’d on other grounds, sub nom., Sampson v. … As is so in the case of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records, see Ogden v. Zuckert, 111 U.S.App.D.C. at 401 , 298 F.2d at 315 ; Turner v. Callaway, 371 F.Supp. at 191 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Dole v. National Alliance of Postal & Federal Employees

    725 F. Supp. 56 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 31, 1989

    F-1, F-2; Board Minutes (April 1989), p. 11. This court now has subject-matter jurisdiction over the Secretary’s attempts to enforce the election results. 29 U.S.C. § 482 (b); see e.g., Dunlop v. … Shelley v. Brock, 793 F.2d 1368, 1372 (D.C.Cir.1986).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Friedman v. U.S. Secret Service

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 2, 2014

    COLUMBIA ________________________________ ) DONALD FRIEDMAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. … DATE: January 2, 2014 /s/ KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Arnold v. Salazar

    970 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 19, 2013

    P. 56(a); see also Anderson v. … Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 458-59 (D.C. Cir. 1999) (internal quotation marks omitted), abrogated in part by Burlington N. & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Armco Steel Corp. v. International Armament Corp.

    249 F. Supp. 954 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 11, 1966

    With regard to the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals affirmance of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board in Bendix Aviation Corporation v. … Co. v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Iweala v. Operational Technologies Services, Inc.

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 15, 2009

    Nonetheless, in rejecting the backpay award, the Court noted that their decision did “not mean that the employer [got] off scot-free” because the Board had “already imposed other significant sanctions.” … Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C. Cir. 1999) (internal quotation marks omitted).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sparks v. Gaines

    144 F. Supp. 2d 9 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 17, 2001

    See Stevens v. … Greenholtz v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • National Industrial Traffic League v. United States

    287 F. Supp. 129 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 22, 1968

    Prior to that date, however, the Commission Board of Suspension in each case on July 12, 1967 issued an order instituting an investigation into the lawfulness of such increased rates, sus *131 pending the operation of the … Arrow Transportation Company v. Southern Railway Co., 372 U.S. 658 , 83 S.Ct. 984 , 10 L.Ed.2d 52 (1963); Movers’ & Warehousemen’s Ass’n. v. United States, D.D.C., 227 F.Supp. 249 (1964); Carlsen v. United States, D.C.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Bruns v. Usaa

    District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 29, 2021

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BRUNS, ef al., Plaintiffs, V. Case No. 20-cv-501 (RCL) USAA, et al, Defendants. … The Complaint against defendant Brown is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to timely effect service. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Pearson v. Bowser

    District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 23, 2024

    Retirement Board’s Motion to Dismiss Defendants Bowser and the D.C. … Lammers Kurtz v. United States, 779 F. Supp. 2d 50, 51 (D.D.C. 2011); see also Chandler v. District of Columbia, 578 F.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Saunders v. Hankerson

    312 F. Supp. 2d 46 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 8, 2004

    See George v. … O’Connor v. Freyman, 1985 WL 121 at * 5; see also George v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Mogenhan v. Chertoff

    577 F. Supp. 2d 210 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 17, 2008

    Mineta, 284 F.3d 135, 145 (D.C.Cir.2002) (quoting Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C.Cir.1999)). In McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. … Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 459 (D.C.Cir.1999).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Powell v. Marsh

    560 F. Supp. 636 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 1983

    See Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). However, neither of these interests is present here. … Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. at 575 , 92 S.Ct. at 2708 . Here, plaintiff is seeking to acquire disability benefits. Under these circumstances, no property interest is implicated. 7 .

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Jsc Transmashholding v. Miller

    70 F. Supp. 3d 516 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 6, 2014

    Compl., Ex. 2 (Minutes of the Meeting of the Board of Directors held June 7, 2011 (“June 2011 Board Minutes” or “Minutes”)) at 1. … Compl., Ex. 2 (June 2011 Board Minutes) at 1.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Air Transport Ass'n of America, Inc. v. Export-Import Bank

    840 F. Supp. 2d 327 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 13, 2012

    .”); Little v. … Berman v.

    Cited 47 timesPublished
  • United States v. Sheffield

    842 F. Supp. 2d 227 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 7, 2012

    (Rough), 11/29/11 PM (Detective Scott Brown). … Pettiford, 517 F.3d at 591 (quoting United States v. Lafayette, 983 F.2d 1102, 1105 (D.C. Cir. 1993) and Thompson v. United States, 188 F.2d 652, 653 (D.C. Cir. 1951)); United States v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • United States v. Morten

    730 F. Supp. 2d 11 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 4, 2010

    Georgia, 725 F.2d 622, 623 (11th Cir.1984) (quoting Williamson v. Tucker, 645 F.2d 404, 415 (5th Cir.1981)); see also U.S. ex rel. Kreindler & Kreindler v. United Tech. … See DSMC, Inc. v. Convera Corp., 273 F.Supp.2d 14, 23 (D.D.C.2002).

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Paroczay v. Hodges

    219 F. Supp. 89 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 26, 1963

    Paroczay v. Hodges, 111 U.S.App.D.C. 362 , 297 F.2d 439 (1961). … Board of Appeals and Review on January 15, 1963.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Fid. & Dep. Co. v. PRESIDENT & DIRECTORS, ETC.

    483 F. Supp. 1142 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 7, 1980

    United States v. Seckinger, 397 U.S. 203, 216 , 90 S.Ct. 880, 888 , 25 L.Ed.2d 224 (1970). This canon of construction has been vigorously applied in insurance cases. See Imperial Insurance, Inc. v. … Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co., 376 F.Supp. 901, 906 (W.D.Okl. 1973).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. Bryan

    72 F. Supp. 58 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 21, 1947

    Somewhat similar subpoenas were held valid in Brown v. United States, 276 U.S. 134, 138 , 48 S.Ct. 288 , 72 L.Ed. 500 ; and Wheeler v. United States, 226 U.S. 478, 483 , 33 S.Ct. 158 , 57 L.Ed. 309 . … Finally, in the case of United States v. Edward K.

    Cited 10 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.