Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
6.29s
403 F. Supp. 467 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 4, 1975
Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Ass’n v. FPC, 104 U.S.App.D.C. 106 , 259 F.2d 921 (1958), Murray v. Kunzig, 149 U.S.App.D.C. 256 , 462 F.2d 871 (1972), rev’d on other grounds, sub nom., Sampson v. … As is so in the case of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records, see Ogden v. Zuckert, 111 U.S.App.D.C. at 401 , 298 F.2d at 315 ; Turner v. Callaway, 371 F.Supp. at 191 .
Cited 1 timesPublishedDole v. National Alliance of Postal & Federal Employees
725 F. Supp. 56 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 31, 1989
F-1, F-2; Board Minutes (April 1989), p. 11. This court now has subject-matter jurisdiction over the Secretary’s attempts to enforce the election results. 29 U.S.C. § 482 (b); see e.g., Dunlop v. … Shelley v. Brock, 793 F.2d 1368, 1372 (D.C.Cir.1986).
Cited 1 timesPublishedFriedman v. U.S. Secret Service
District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 2, 2014
COLUMBIA ________________________________ ) DONALD FRIEDMAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. … DATE: January 2, 2014 /s/ KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge
Cited 0 timesPublished970 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 19, 2013
P. 56(a); see also Anderson v. … Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 458-59 (D.C. Cir. 1999) (internal quotation marks omitted), abrogated in part by Burlington N. & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedArmco Steel Corp. v. International Armament Corp.
249 F. Supp. 954 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 11, 1966
With regard to the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals affirmance of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board in Bendix Aviation Corporation v. … Co. v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedIweala v. Operational Technologies Services, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 15, 2009
Nonetheless, in rejecting the backpay award, the Court noted that their decision did “not mean that the employer [got] off scot-free” because the Board had “already imposed other significant sanctions.” … Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C. Cir. 1999) (internal quotation marks omitted).
Cited 0 timesPublished144 F. Supp. 2d 9 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 17, 2001
See Stevens v. … Greenholtz v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedNational Industrial Traffic League v. United States
287 F. Supp. 129 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 22, 1968
Prior to that date, however, the Commission Board of Suspension in each case on July 12, 1967 issued an order instituting an investigation into the lawfulness of such increased rates, sus *131 pending the operation of the … Arrow Transportation Company v. Southern Railway Co., 372 U.S. 658 , 83 S.Ct. 984 , 10 L.Ed.2d 52 (1963); Movers’ & Warehousemen’s Ass’n. v. United States, D.D.C., 227 F.Supp. 249 (1964); Carlsen v. United States, D.C.
Cited 6 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Mar 29, 2021
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BRUNS, ef al., Plaintiffs, V. Case No. 20-cv-501 (RCL) USAA, et al, Defendants. … The Complaint against defendant Brown is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to timely effect service. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m).
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Sep 23, 2024
Retirement Board’s Motion to Dismiss Defendants Bowser and the D.C. … Lammers Kurtz v. United States, 779 F. Supp. 2d 50, 51 (D.D.C. 2011); see also Chandler v. District of Columbia, 578 F.
Cited 0 timesPublished312 F. Supp. 2d 46 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 8, 2004
See George v. … O’Connor v. Freyman, 1985 WL 121 at * 5; see also George v.
Cited 6 timesPublished577 F. Supp. 2d 210 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 17, 2008
Mineta, 284 F.3d 135, 145 (D.C.Cir.2002) (quoting Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C.Cir.1999)). In McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. … Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 459 (D.C.Cir.1999).
Cited 2 timesPublished560 F. Supp. 636 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 1983
See Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). However, neither of these interests is present here. … Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. at 575 , 92 S.Ct. at 2708 . Here, plaintiff is seeking to acquire disability benefits. Under these circumstances, no property interest is implicated. 7 .
Cited 9 timesPublishedJsc Transmashholding v. Miller
70 F. Supp. 3d 516 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 6, 2014
Compl., Ex. 2 (Minutes of the Meeting of the Board of Directors held June 7, 2011 (“June 2011 Board Minutes” or “Minutes”)) at 1. … Compl., Ex. 2 (June 2011 Board Minutes) at 1.
Cited 12 timesPublishedAir Transport Ass'n of America, Inc. v. Export-Import Bank
840 F. Supp. 2d 327 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 13, 2012
.”); Little v. … Berman v.
Cited 47 timesPublished842 F. Supp. 2d 227 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 7, 2012
(Rough), 11/29/11 PM (Detective Scott Brown). … Pettiford, 517 F.3d at 591 (quoting United States v. Lafayette, 983 F.2d 1102, 1105 (D.C. Cir. 1993) and Thompson v. United States, 188 F.2d 652, 653 (D.C. Cir. 1951)); United States v.
Cited 2 timesPublished730 F. Supp. 2d 11 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 4, 2010
Georgia, 725 F.2d 622, 623 (11th Cir.1984) (quoting Williamson v. Tucker, 645 F.2d 404, 415 (5th Cir.1981)); see also U.S. ex rel. Kreindler & Kreindler v. United Tech. … See DSMC, Inc. v. Convera Corp., 273 F.Supp.2d 14, 23 (D.D.C.2002).
Cited 12 timesPublished219 F. Supp. 89 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 26, 1963
Paroczay v. Hodges, 111 U.S.App.D.C. 362 , 297 F.2d 439 (1961). … Board of Appeals and Review on January 15, 1963.
Cited 26 timesPublishedFid. & Dep. Co. v. PRESIDENT & DIRECTORS, ETC.
483 F. Supp. 1142 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 7, 1980
United States v. Seckinger, 397 U.S. 203, 216 , 90 S.Ct. 880, 888 , 25 L.Ed.2d 224 (1970). This canon of construction has been vigorously applied in insurance cases. See Imperial Insurance, Inc. v. … Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co., 376 F.Supp. 901, 906 (W.D.Okl. 1973).
Cited 0 timesPublished72 F. Supp. 58 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 21, 1947
Somewhat similar subpoenas were held valid in Brown v. United States, 276 U.S. 134, 138 , 48 S.Ct. 288 , 72 L.Ed. 500 ; and Wheeler v. United States, 226 U.S. 478, 483 , 33 S.Ct. 158 , 57 L.Ed. 309 . … Finally, in the case of United States v. Edward K.
Cited 10 timesPublished
Ask Donna