Case law

Bryan v. U.S. Department of Justice

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 12, 2013

) HOWARD BRYAN ) also known as Paul Smith, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. … /s/ KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge DATE: August 12, 2013

Coleman v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.

196 F.R.D. 193 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 10, 2000

See, e.g., Brown v. United States, 151 F.3d 800, 803-04 (8th Cir.1998) (treating issue of sovereign immunity as one of subject matter jurisdiction under Rule 12(b)(1)); Barrientos v. Reliance Standard Life Ins. … Mar.12, 1998) (citing cases); see also Vega v. State University of New York Board of Trustees, 2000 WL 381430 , *2 (S.D.N.Y.

Sisse v. Moniz

388 F. Supp. 3d 63 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 1, 2019

See Cruz v. … ."); see also Manguriu v.

Turner v. United States Capitol Police

34 F. Supp. 3d 124 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2014

See id.; Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … V.

Petties v. District of Columbia

238 F. Supp. 2d 88 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 14, 2002

Petties v. District of Columbia, 881 F.Supp. at 66 -67 (quoting Cox v. Brown, 498 F.Supp. 823, 830 (D.D.C.1980) and citing Fisher v. District of Columbia, 828 F.Supp. 87, 88-89 (D.D.C.1993)). … Lunceford v. District of Columbia Board of Education, 745 F.2d 1577, 1582 (D.C.Cir.1984) (citing Concerned Parents & Citizens for the Continuing Education at Malcolm X v.

Vikonics, Inc. v. United States

749 F. Supp. 315 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 2, 1990

Foundation on Economic Trends v. Heckler, 756 F.2d 143, 157 (D.C. *318 Cir.1985). As the court explained in WMATA v. … Brown Aff. at para. 32.

United States v. Felder

732 F. Supp. 204 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 7, 1990

Many of the passengers had already left the bus by the time the officers boarded, but approximately six to ten passengers were still on board. … As Justice Douglas noted in Aptheker v.

Brodetski v. Duffey

199 F.R.D. 14 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 28, 2001

See Brown v. Gen. Serv. Admin., 425 U.S. 820, 832-33 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976); Kizas v. Webster, 707 F.2d 524, 543 (D.C.Cir. 1983). … See Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452-53 (D.C.Cir.1999) (citing Mitchell v. Baldrige, 759 F.2d 80, 86 (D.C.Cir.1985) (quoting McKenna v. Weinberger, 729 F.2d 783, 788 (D.C.Cir.1984))); see also Cones v.

Kochler v. Mustonen

774 F. Supp. 641 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 23, 1991

Nonetheless, the scope of the federal court’s review is limited to the Board’s decision. See, e.g., Montecatini Edison, S.P.A. v. Ziegler, 486 F.2d 1279, 1282-83 (D.C.Cir.1973); Standard Oil Co. v. … The Commissioner, whose interpretation of the regulations is entitled to deference, see, e.g., Udall v.

United States v. Washington

262 F. Supp. 122 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 7, 1967

Perry v. United States, 118 U.S.App.D.C. 360 , 336 F.2d 748 (1964). . Kelley v. United States, 111 U.S.App.D.C. 396 , 298 F.2d 310 (1961). . See Coleman v. United States, 111 U.S. … See Redmon v. United States, 355 F.2d 407 (9th Cir. 1966). See also Freeman v. United States, 116 U.S.App.D.C. 213, 214 , 322 F.2d 426 (1963).

Dong v. Smithsonian Institution

878 F. Supp. 244 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 28, 1995

Id.; see also Cotton v. Adams, March 18, 1992 Hearing, supra. Further, the Board of Directors are either themselves federal officials or else are selected by federal officials. … Energy Research Foundation v. Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, 917 F.2d 581 (D.C.Cir. 1990). 7 . Pacific Legal Foundation v. Council on Environmental Quality, 636 F.2d 1259 (D.C.Cir.1980). 8 . Dickson v.

Rogler v. Biglow

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 29, 2009

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). “[A] complaint 3 Ms. Rogler appears to be attempting to state a cause of action under Bivens v. … Brown v. GSA, 425 U.S. 820, 835 (1976). She cannot recast her Title VII retaliation claims as constitutional claims. Ethnic Employees of the Library of Cong. v. Boorstin, 751 F.2d 1405, 1414-15, n.12 & 13 (D.C.

Baker v. England

397 F. Supp. 2d 18 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 31, 2005

The Fiscal Year 2005 Lieutenant Commander Selection Board (“FY05 Selection Board”), and the Fiscal Year 2006 Lieutenant Commander Selection Board (“FY06 Selection Board”), which convened in the Fall of 2003 and 2004 respectively … Ass’n v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 463 U.S. 29, 43 , 103 S.Ct. 2856 , 77 L.Ed.2d 443 (1983); see also County of L.A. v.

Doe v. Southeastern University

732 F. Supp. 7 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 21, 1990

See, e.g., Chambers v. Omaha Public School Dist., 536 F.2d 222 (8th Cir.1976); Baker v. Board of Regents of the State of Kansas, 721 F.Supp. 270 (D.Kan.1989). … See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519 , 92 S.Ct. 594 , 30 L.Ed.2d 652 (1972); Brandon v. District of Columbia Board of Parole, 823 F.2d 644 (D.C.Cir.1987). 3 .

Lakner v. U.S. Department of Defense

755 F. Supp. 2d 132 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 15, 2010

Settles v. U.S. Parole Comm’n, 429 F.3d 1098, 1107 (D.C.Cir.2005). … Califano v. Sanders, 430 U.S. 99, 107 , 97 S.Ct. 980 , 51 L.Ed.2d 192 (1977).

Kennedy-Jarvis v. Wells

195 F. Supp. 3d 230 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 1, 2016

In March 2013, the plaintiffs filed suit in this court against Parker and Hope Brown, the successor representative. Jarvis v. Parker, 13 F. Supp. 3d 74, 75 (D.D.C. 2014). … Roa v. Roa, 985 A.2d 1225, 1231 (N.J. 2010) (quoting Wilson v. Wal- Mart Stores, 729 A.2d 1006, 1010 (N.J. 1999)).

Hill v. Geren

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 11, 2009

Homer v. Roche, 226 F. Supp. 2d 222, 226 (D.D.C. 2002) (finding that military board did not provide adequate explanation for its denial of plaintiff’s request for promotion to colonel). … That argument appears nowhere in the Board’s decision, contrary to the “‘fundamental rule of administrative law’” that this Court must judge the Board’s decision solely by the grounds invoked by the Board. Poole v.

Maniar v. Wolf

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 1, 2026

When she was again unable to print her own boarding pass, she had to speak with an airline clerk who “had to get permission from . . . the TSC[] before issuing [her] a boarding pass.” Id. ¶ 94. … See, e.g., Abdi v.

Alley v. Resolution Trust Corp.

790 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 23, 1992

The Court rejects plaintiffs’ argument that the Supreme Court’s decision in Fort Halifax Packing Co. v. … See Friesen v.

United States v. National Ass'n of Real Estate Boards

80 F. Supp. 350 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 4, 1948

Last Tuesday and Wednesday there was argued before this court two motions for judgments of acquittal; one made by the National Association of Real Estate Boards and one made by the Washington Real Estate Board, two co-defendants … And I was particularly impressed by the language of the court in the Duluth case, (State v.