Case law

Ficken v. Rice

594 F. Supp. 2d 71 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 1, 2009

See Crane v. N.Y. Zoological Soc’y, 894 F.2d 454, 456 (D.C.Cir.1990); First Chi. Int’l v. United Exch. … See Chrysler Corp. v.

Titanium Metals Corp. v. Mossinghoff

603 F. Supp. 87 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 28, 1984

Pro-Col Corp. v. Commissioner of Patents, 141 U.S. App.D.C. 142,143, 436 F.2d 296, 297 (1970) (citations omitted). … DeSeversky v. Brenner, 137 U.S.App.D.C. 369 , 370, 424 F.2d 857, 858 (1970) (emphasis the Court’s). “Deference is owed to the findings of the Patent Office.” Puharich v.

Stewart v. Gates

District Court, District of Columbia · May 16, 2011

v. … In Ricks, the plaintiff was a college professor who had been denied tenure by a vote of the college’s board of trustees. Id. at 252.

In Re Fed. Nat. Mortg. Ass'n Sec., Derivative, Erisa

725 F. Supp. 2d 159 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 27, 2010

He relies on Mullins v. De Soto Sec. … The other cases were originally captioned as Kellmer v. Raines (Civ. No. 07-1173), Arthur v. Mudd (Civ. No. 07-2130), and Agnes v. Raines (Civ. No. 08-1093).

Barry v. United States Capitol Guide Service

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 21, 2009

Mere knowledge by one member of the Board, i.e., Livingood's knowledge, is not enough to demonstrate that the Board undertook its action for retaliatory reasons. 10 See Carpenter v. Fed. … Mary's Honor Ctr. v.

Parker v. District of Columbia

588 F. Supp. 518 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 29, 1983

See Bennett v. District *521 of Columbia Board of Education, No. 82-0224 (D DC April 22, 1983). … Keith v. Washington, 401 A.2d 468, 471 (D.C.App.1979). See also Roberson v. District of Columbia Board of Higher Education, 359 A.2d 28, 31, n. 4 (D.C.App.1976); Farrell v. Ward, 53 A.2d 46, 50 (D.C.Mun.App.1947); D.C.

Fontaine v. Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

42 F. Supp. 3d 102 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 16, 2014

Supp. 2d 174, 182 (D.D.C. 2012) (internal quotation marks omitted) (citing Brown v. District of Columbia, 514 F.3d 1279, 1283 (D.C. … Epps v. U.S. Capitol Police Bd., 719 F. Supp. 2d 7, 13 (D.D.C. 2010) (citing Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C. Cir. 2003) and Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.

McGrady v. Winter

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 22, 2009

Landgraf v. USI Film Prods., 511 U.S. 244, 280 (1994). … Dep’t of Interior v. Klamath Water Users Protective Ass’n, 532 U.S. 1, 8-9 (2001) (quoting NLRB v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 421 U.S. 132, 150 (1975) (internal quotation marks omitted)); see also Public Citizen, Inc. v.

Zacharias v. McGrath

105 F. Supp. 421 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 22, 1952

There being no statutory definition of stowaway the Board’s determination under the circumstances was justified. Cf. United States ex rel. Candreva v. Smith, 7 Cir., 1928, 27 F.2d 642 . … National Labor Relations Board, 1941, 313 U.S. 177 , 61 S.Ct. 845 , 85 L.Ed. 1271 . American Power & Light Company v. Securities and Exchange Commission, 1946, 329 U.S. 90 , 67 S.Ct. 133 , 91 L.Ed. 103 . Ludecke v.

In re Certain Carriers

241 F. Supp. 1004 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 7, 1965

The Court has given due consideration to the decision of the Supreme Court in Republic Steel Corp. v. … The Court wishes to say that is observations are not to be taken as a criticism of the Board. The Board has performed a difficult ana intricate task in a superb manner.

Cancelosi v. Columbia Lighthouse for the Blind

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 6, 2025

On April 30, 2025, the Board voted to terminate Plaintiff. (Id.). Dr. … Doe v. Choice Hotels Int’l, Inc., No. 24-cv-1598-TDC, 2025 WL 2108792, at *10 (D.Md. July 28, 2025) (quoting Carey v.

John Lecroy & Son, Inc. v. Langis Foods, Ltd.

376 F. Supp. 962 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 29, 1974

See Vanity Fair Mills v. T. … Aircraft Radio Corp. v. ARC Sound Ltd., 58 C.C.P.A. 1127 , 440 F.2d 436 (CCPA 1971); Sterling Drug Inc. v. Sankyo Co. Ltd., 139 U.S.P.Q. 395 (1963).

Nasa Federal Credit Union v. W. Jenkins Plumbing & Heating Co.

607 F. Supp. 2d 213 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 20, 2009

Harvey, citing Filla v. … Brown v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 26 F.Supp.2d 74, 76-77 (D.D.C.1998) (quoting B., Inc. v. Miller Brewing Co., 663 F.2d 545, 549 (5th Cir.1981)).

American Medical International, Inc. v. Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare

466 F. Supp. 605 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 2, 1979

. § 1395x(v)(l)(A). … See Gosman v.

Kiska Construction corporation-u.S.A. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 9, 2010

See Crown Coat Front Co. v. … United States. v. Mendoza, 464 U.S. 154, 158 (1984).

Ferguson v. Local 689, Amalgamated Transit Union

626 F. Supp. 2d 55 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 19, 2009

On November 6, 2007, the Board of Arbitration declined to hear the merits of Ferguson’s grievance because Local 689 filed the request in an untimely manner. Id. ¶ 20 . … (quoting Baldwin County Welcome Ctr. v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 151 , 104 S.Ct. 1723 , 80 L.Ed.2d 196 (1984)).

Lubow v. United States Department of State

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 10, 2010

Sierra Club v. Van Antwerp, 560 F. Supp. 2d 21, 23 (D.D.C. 2008); accord Ethyl Corp. v. Browner, 989 F.2d 522, 524 (D.C. Cir. 1993); see also Citizens Against the Pellissippi Parkway Extension, Inc. v. … Power & Light Co. v.

American Maritime Ass'n v. Stans

329 F. Supp. 1179 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 12, 1971

Administrative Procedure Act, Section 10, 5 U.S.C. § 703 ; Pacific Far East Line, Inc. v. Federal Maritime Board, 107 U.S.App.D.C. 155 , 275 F.2d 184 , cert. den. 363 U.S. 827 , 80 S.Ct. 1597 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1523 (1960). … See American Mail Line, Ltd. v. Gulick, 133 U.S.App.D.C. 382 , 411 F.2d 696 (1969); Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc. v. United States, 413 F.2d 568 , 188 Ct.Cl. 644 (1969); New York Shipbuilding Corp. v.

Coleman v. District of Columbia

828 F. Supp. 2d 87 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 7, 2011

The notice further stated that a trial would take place before a FEMS Fire Trial Board (“Trial Board”). Id. … Code § 7-1131.05); Singletary v. District of Columbia, 685 F. Supp. 2d 81, 90-91 (D.D.C. 2010) (holding the District of Columbia Board of Parole to be a final policy maker).

Dominquez v. Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 3, 2014

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 677-78 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Ketanji Brown Jackson Ketanji Brown Jackson United States District Judge DATE: October 3, 2014