Case law

McKelvey v. Walters

596 F. Supp. 1317 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 19, 1984

The plaintiff appealed this decision to the Board of Veterans Appeals (“Board”); and after a hearing, the appeal was denied on August 6, 1980. … Frazier v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 672 F.2d 150, 168 (D.C.Cir.1982).

Vape Central Group, LLC v. Food & Drug Administration

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 27, 2025

Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 120 (2000))). That changed in 2009, when Congress enacted the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (“TCA” or “the Act”), Pub. L. … See Elgin v.

Wilson v. Fullwood

772 F. Supp. 2d 246 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 28, 2011

Parole Board that operated with nearly complete discretion. Austin v. Reilly, 606 F.Supp.2d 4, 8 (D.D.C.2009). … Under both the 1972 and 1981 Regulations, “the Board had no formalized scoring system.... The decision to grant parole remained within the discretion of the Board....” Davis v.

America's Community Bankers v. Federal Deposit Insurance

31 F. Supp. 2d 137 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 25, 1998

City of Chicago v. EDF, 511 U.S. 328, 338 , 114 S.Ct. 1588 , 128 L.Ed.2d 302 (1994). … See Tierney v. Schweiker, 718 F.2d 449, 456 (D.C.Cir.1983). If the sort of specific relief contemplated by the APA is not available, a declaratory judgment would serve no purpose. Cf. McKay v.

Quantum Entertainment Limited v. United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Indian Affairs

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 19, 2009

P. 56(c); see also Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322 (1986); Diamond v. Atwood, 43 F.3d 1538, 1540 (D.C. Cir. 1995). … Ass’n v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins.

Egilman v. Keller & Heckman, LLP.

401 F. Supp. 2d 105 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 10, 2005

Brown v. Gino Morena Enters., 44 F.Supp.2d 41, 52 (D.D.C.1999). … Smith v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 3 F.Supp.2d 1473, 1475 (D.D.C.1998) (citations omitted). 7 .

Vreven v. Aarp

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 26, 2009

See Kowal v. MCI Communications Corp., 16 F.3d at 1276; Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). 4  III. … Novelli made these statements to the Board of Directors, “it is hard to see how [plaintiff] could satisfy the requirement of providing . . . ‘fair notice’” to defendant. Bell Atlantic Corp. v.

Calhoun v. Prouty

643 F. Supp. 2d 87 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 12, 2009

E.g., Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C.Cir.1999). … Brown, 199 F.3d at 458 .

Steffan v. Cheney

733 F. Supp. 115 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 21, 1989

Major Funk instructed plaintiff to make this request to *117 the Academic Board. On April 1 the Academic Board convened to consider plaintiffs case. … See Bois v. Marsh, 801 F.2d at 466 n. 5; Simpson v.

Portland Adventist Medical Center v. Heckler

561 F. Supp. 1092 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 13, 1983

. §§ 1395f(b); 1395x(b), (e); 1395x(v)(l)(A). … (the Board). 42 U.S.C. § 1395oo(a).

Brooks v. Goodwill of Greater Washington

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 25, 2015

See, e.g., Davis v. Vilsack, 880 F. … Date: March 25, 2015 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

St. Helena Clear Lake Hospital v. Azar, II

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2021

. § 1395x(v)(1)(A). … Luke Community Health Care v.

Baptiste v. Sequoia Capital Operations, LLC

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 6, 2025

Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). … v.

Coster v. Schwat

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 25, 2025

Programming Found., Inc. v. … “To establish that a board was interested or lacked independence, a plaintiff must allege facts as to the interest and lack of independence of the individual members of that board.” Orman v.

Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Bureau of Land Management

562 F. Supp. 2d 159 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 27, 2008

The court in Trout , the case on which defendant principally relies, expressly endorsed the decision in Brown v. Secretary of the Army, 78 F.3d 645 (D.C.Cir.1996), and relied heavily on that court’s ruling. … The court in Brown , in turn, stressed that its ruling did not upset the decision in Thompson v.

Colm v. Kissinger

406 F. Supp. 1250 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 17, 1975

Plaintiffs cite for this proposition Perry v. Sindermann, 408 U.S. 593, 603 , 92 S.Ct. 2694 , 33 L.Ed.2d 570 (1972); Slochower v. Board of Higher Education, 350 U.S. 551 , 76 S.Ct. 637 , 100 L.Ed. 692 (1956); Wieman v. … See Bailey v. Richardson, 86 U.S.App.D.C. 248 , 182 F.2d 46 (1950), aff’d by an equally divided Court, 341 U.S. 918 , 71 S.Ct. 669 , 95 L.Ed. 1352 (1951). 23 . See Board of Regents v.

Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union v. United States Department of Energy

141 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 16, 2001

See, e.g., Ralph Hoar & Assocs. v. … Cotton v. Heyman, 63 F.3d 1115, 1120 (D.C.Cir.1995) (quoting Tax Analysts v. United States Dep't of Justice, 965 F.2d 1092, 1095 (D.C.Cir.1992)).

Select Specialty Hospital - Bloomington, Inc. v. Sebelius

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2011

Supp. 2d at 104-05 (quoting Thomas Je/ferson Univ. v. … V. The Board Properly Found That the "New Hospital" Exception Was Unavailable In the Gap Year.

United States v. Gonzalez

688 F. Supp. 658 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 28, 1988

United States v. … The United States Supreme Court has held that § 3072 entitles officers of the Customs to board and search American vessels in international waters. Maul v.

Merck & Co., Inc. v. Food and Drug Admin.

148 F. Supp. 2d 27 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 20, 2001

United States v. Mead Corp., No. 99-1434, Slip Op at 8 (U.S. June 18, 2001) (citing General Elec. Co. v. Gilbert, 429 U.S. 125, 142 , 97 S.Ct. 401 , 50 L.Ed.2d 343 (1976); Skidmore v. … Occidental Petroleum Corp. v. SEC, 873 F.2d 325, 338 (D.C.Cir.1989).