Case law

Service Employees International Union National Industry Pension Fund v. Ltp Generations, LLC

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 29, 2019

) FUND, et al., ) ) No. 17-cv-0942 (KBJ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. … DATE: March 29, 2019 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

General Railway Signal Co. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

598 F. Supp. 595 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 14, 1984

See Victory Construction Co. v. United States, 510 F.2d 1379, 1385 , 206 Ct.Cl. 274 (1975). … Nielsen Co. v. United States, 141 Ct.Cl. 793 (1958).

Brooks v. Goodwill of Greater Washington

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 25, 2015

See, e.g., Davis v. Vilsack, 880 F. … Date: March 25, 2015 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

Nader v. Allegheny Airlines, Inc.

365 F. Supp. 128 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 18, 1973

boarding on a flight. … Forthwith upon denying boarding to Mr.

Cancelosi v. Columbia Lighthouse for the Blind

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 6, 2025

On April 30, 2025, the Board voted to terminate Plaintiff. (Id.). Dr. … Doe v. Choice Hotels Int’l, Inc., No. 24-cv-1598-TDC, 2025 WL 2108792, at *10 (D.Md. July 28, 2025) (quoting Carey v.

Associated Third Class Mail Users v. United States Postal Service

405 F. Supp. 1109 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 16, 1975

Mail Advertising Corporation of America, Inc., et al. v. U. S. Postal Service, 148 U.S. App.D.C. 158, 459 F.2d 1182, 1183 (1970). … V). It appears to the Court that this argument is without merit. It totally ignores the significance of the changes produced by the Act. Prior to the Act, the Rate Commission did not exist.

Heagney v. Garland

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 14, 2025

And on September 8, 2022, the ATF Professional Review Board met to review the OIG report. Id. ¶ 44. On October 24, 2022, the Board notified Mr. … Heagney] alleges that the Board met on September 8, 2022, he does not allege that the Board resolved the investigation that same day.” (citing Compl. ¶ 44)).

John Lecroy & Son, Inc. v. Langis Foods, Ltd.

376 F. Supp. 962 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 29, 1974

See Vanity Fair Mills v. T. … Aircraft Radio Corp. v. ARC Sound Ltd., 58 C.C.P.A. 1127 , 440 F.2d 436 (CCPA 1971); Sterling Drug Inc. v. Sankyo Co. Ltd., 139 U.S.P.Q. 395 (1963).

Adams v. Clinton

90 F. Supp. 2d 27 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 20, 2000

Shook v. … In Adams v.

Gardiner v. Tarr

341 F. Supp. 422 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 18, 1972

See Fein v. Selective Service System, 405 U.S. 365 , 92 S.Ct. 1062 , 31 L.Ed.2d 298 (1972); Oestereich v. Selective Service Board, 393 U.S. 233 , 89 S.Ct. 414 , 21 L.Ed.2d 402 (1968); Clark v. … Swift v. Director, supra, 448 F.2d at 1150 .

American Medical International, Inc. v. Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare

466 F. Supp. 605 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 2, 1979

. § 1395x(v)(l)(A). … See Gosman v.

Bonilla v. United States

653 F. Supp. 749 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 11, 1987

I find that the Board’s determination is amply supported by the record. V. … See Ford Motor Company v.

Lakner v. Esper

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 25, 2021

Quinn v. District of Columbia, 740 F. … Although the Board’s reasoning on this point is not a “model of analytical clarity,” see Frizelle v. Slater, 111 F.3d 172, 176 (D.C.

Samaritan Health Service v. Heckler

619 F. Supp. 713 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 2, 1985

As the Supreme Court noted in Heckler v. … See Skidmore v.

Merck & Co., Inc. v. Food and Drug Admin.

148 F. Supp. 2d 27 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 20, 2001

United States v. Mead Corp., No. 99-1434, Slip Op at 8 (U.S. June 18, 2001) (citing General Elec. Co. v. Gilbert, 429 U.S. 125, 142 , 97 S.Ct. 401 , 50 L.Ed.2d 343 (1976); Skidmore v. … Occidental Petroleum Corp. v. SEC, 873 F.2d 325, 338 (D.C.Cir.1989).

Cooper v. Jackson

941 F. Supp. 2d 75 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 23, 2013

MPD; Jack Raher, Chief Psychiatrist of the Board of Police and Fire Surgeons; James Wellhouse, Psychiatrist employed by the Board of Police and Fire Surgeons; Robert Noyes, MPD Captain; Thomas Carroll, MPD Inspector; Robert … Wilson v. Fulwood, 772 F.

Swan v. Clinton

932 F. Supp. 8 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 21, 1996

Crain v. Board of Police Comm’rs of Metro. Police Dep’t, 920 F.2d 1402 , 1405-1406 (8th Cir.1990). Such issues include matters turning on statutory interpretation. Edwards v. … In Myers v.

United States v. Gonzalez

688 F. Supp. 658 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 28, 1988

United States v. … The United States Supreme Court has held that § 3072 entitles officers of the Customs to board and search American vessels in international waters. Maul v.

Fontaine v. Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

42 F. Supp. 3d 102 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 16, 2014

Supp. 2d 174, 182 (D.D.C. 2012) (internal quotation marks omitted) (citing Brown v. District of Columbia, 514 F.3d 1279, 1283 (D.C. … Epps v. U.S. Capitol Police Bd., 719 F. Supp. 2d 7, 13 (D.D.C. 2010) (citing Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C. Cir. 2003) and Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.

Runnels v. Federal Bureau of Investigation

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 5, 2025

See Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … United States v. Fausto, 484 U.S. 439, 443-44 (1988). Under the CSRA, a qualified employee is entitled to a review by the Merit Systems Protection Board, followed by an appeal to the U.S.