Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.67s
District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 5, 2013
See Allen v. … Date: November 5, 2013 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge
Cited 0 timesPublishedU-Ahk-Vroman-Sanchez v. United States Department of Defense
District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 4, 2021
Stewart v. Sackley, 251 F. Supp. 3d 138, 156 (D.D.C. 2017) (cleaned up); see also Fred Meyer Stores, Inc. v. NLRB, 865 F.3d 630, 638 (D.C. … V.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMotley v. Southeast Neighborhood House (In re Southeast Neighborhood House)
93 B.R. 303 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 19, 1988
See McCreery v. RSA Management, Inc., 249 Ga. 43 , 287 S.E.2d 203 (1982); Essential Enterprises Corp. v. Automatic Steel Prods., 39 *306 DeL.Ch. 371, 164 A.2d 437 (1960); Gentry-Futch Co. v. … See Thompson v.
Cited 1 timesPublished103 F. Supp. 639 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 11, 1952
In United States v. … Ludolph v. Board of Police Commissioners, 30 Cal.App.2d 211 , 86 P.2d 118, 121 ; Application of Scro, 200 Misc. 688 , 108 N.Y.S.2d 305, 307 .
Cited 32 timesPublished571 F. Supp. 2d 120 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 15, 2008
Thus, when the court reviews the “final decision of a military correction board, the court has a very limited scope of review.” Epstein v. Geren, 539 F.Supp.2d 267, 275 (D.D.C.2008). … Frizelle, 111 F.3d at 177 (stating that a military corrections board acts arbitrarily when it fails to respond to non-frivolous arguments); Appleby v.
Cited 21 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Aug 13, 2021
Sierra Club v. Mainella, 459 F. Supp. 2d 76, 89-90 10 (D.D.C. 2006). … (quoting Gilligan v. Morgan, 413 U.S. 1, 10 (1973)).
Cited 0 timesPublishedThomas v. District of Columbia Government
580 F. Supp. 2d 142 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2008
Sparrow v. … See Moody v.
Cited 6 timesPublished796 F. Supp. 28 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 16, 1992
This Court must affirm the Board’s decision that Plaintiff’s claim is without merit. In reviewing a decision of the Foreign Service Grievance Board this Court must afford great deference to Board’s decision. See U.S. v. … See id. at 513-514 ; F.T.C. v. Indiana Federation of Dentists, 476 U.S. 447, 454 , 106 S.Ct. 2009, 2015-2016 , 90 L.Ed.2d 445 (1986).
Cited 1 timesPublished123 F. Supp. 831 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 9, 1954
Arant v. Lane, 1919, 249 U.S. 367, 372 , 39 S.Ct. 293, 294 , 63 L.Ed. 650, 652 ; Grasse v. … As is indicated in Grasse v. Snyder, supra, his administrative remedies were exhausted and the doors of this Court open to plaintiff in February, 1948, when his appeal was denied by the Board of Appeals and Review.
Cited 2 timesPublishedSeed Company Limited v. Westerman
840 F. Supp. 2d 116 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 5, 2012
In June 2002, the Board granted Seed’s request to receive the benefit of the July 31, 1991 date associated with the JP 371 application (“Board’s June 2002 decision”). Id. ¶ 23. … to the Board.
Cited 7 timesPublished879 F. Supp. 2d 60 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 25, 2012
Parole Commission (“USPC”) assumed the responsibilities of the District of Columbia Board of Parole (“the Board”). See Taylor v. Reilly, No. 10-5153, 2012 WL 2892392 at *1 (D.C. Cir. 2012). … See Sellmon v. Reilly, 561 F. Supp. 2d 46, 51-52 (D.D.C. 2008). For the reasons set forth in those opinions, it again rejects the argument that the Board had unlimited discretion. B.
Cited 5 timesPublished376 F. Supp. 1060 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 5, 1974
W. v. National Right to Work, 366 F.Supp. at 48 . … N.L.R.B. v. Industrial Union of Marine & Ship Workers, 391 U.S. 418 , 88 S.Ct. 1717 , 20 L.Ed.2d 706 (1968) ; Roberts v. N.L.R.B., supra. .
Cited 4 timesPublishedEgilman v. Keller & Heckman, LLP.
401 F. Supp. 2d 105 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 10, 2005
Brown v. Gino Morena Enters., 44 F.Supp.2d 41, 52 (D.D.C.1999). … Smith v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 3 F.Supp.2d 1473, 1475 (D.D.C.1998) (citations omitted). 7 .
Cited 17 timesPublishedMcKinley v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 8, 2011
Dep’t of Justice v. … See Mason v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedFederal Prescription Service, Inc. v. American Pharmaceutical Ass'n
484 F. Supp. 1195 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 14, 1980
See also National Society of Professional Engineers v. United States, 435 U.S. 679 , 98 S.Ct. 1355 , 55 L.Ed.2d 637 (1978); Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. … See California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking Unlimited, supra, 404 U.S. at 513 , 92 S.Ct. at 613 ; Israel v.
Reversed in part, on other grounds by Federal Prescription Service, Inc. v. American Pharmaceutical Ass'n, 663 F.2d 253 (1981)Cited 7 timesPublished388 F. Supp. 3d 63 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 1, 2019
See Cruz v. … ."); see also Manguriu v.
Cited 1 timesPublished990 F. Supp. 13 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 25, 1997
Plaintiffs First Amendment Claim The Supreme Court addressed the parameters of a public employee’s First Amendment rights in Pickering v. Board of Education 391 U.S. 563 , 88 S.Ct. 1731 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968). … Tygrett v. Barry, 627 F.2d 1279, 1282 (D.C.Cir.1980) (emphasis supplied); see also Brasslett v.
Cited 20 timesPublishedWise v. United States Department of Justice
District Court, District of Columbia · May 19, 2025
BACKGROUND Plaintiff alleges that he is a “triple-board-certified oral surgeon,” who faced, in one year, fifty-one “board complaints,” which resulted in the suspension of his license and the imposition of a $45,000 … Jones v. Changsila, 271 F. Supp. 3d 9, 21 (D.D.C. 2017) (quoting Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 93 (2007)).
Cited 0 timesPublished732 F. Supp. 204 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 7, 1990
Many of the passengers had already left the bus by the time the officers boarded, but approximately six to ten passengers were still on board. … As Justice Douglas noted in Aptheker v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedBarber v. District of Columbia Government
District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 13, 2019
Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … See Browning, 292 F.3d at 242.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna