Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersdcd

10,000+ results

4.99s

  • American Federation of Government Employees v. District of Columbia Financial Responsibility & Management Assistance Authority

    133 F. Supp. 2d 75 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 15, 2001

    The Control Board has always clearly been acting as Congress’s agent since its inception. See generally Shook v. … Plaut v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America v. Hoffa

    242 F. Supp. 246 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 14, 1965

    It further admits that as a member of the General Executive Board he authorized such expenditures. … In stockholders’ derivative actions the corporation has frequently made the $oint that the plaintiff made no demand for suit on the board of directors. Quirke v. St.

    Cited 34 timesPublished
  • Ramsey v. Reilly

    613 F. Supp. 2d 6 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 4, 2009

    Board of Parole (“the Board”) on August 27, 1992, with a full-term sentence date of April 11, 2003. See Exhibit C (Certificate of Parole). … See Owens v. Gaines, 219 F.Supp.2d at 103 . The petitioner also argues that both the Parole Board and the Parole Commission unconstitutionally delayed in executing the warrant. See Pet. at 9-10.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Mittleman v. United States Treasury

    773 F. Supp. 442 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 29, 1991

    Brown-Bey v. United States, 720 F.2d 467, 469 (7th Cir.1983); Bruce v. United States, 621 F.2d 914 , 916 n. 2 (8th Cir.1980); Ely v. … Hobson v.

    Cited 43 timesPublished
  • Speight v. Fulwood

    778 F. Supp. 2d 99 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 25, 2011

    See United States Parole Comm’n v. … See LoBue v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • McKelvey v. Walters

    596 F. Supp. 1317 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 19, 1984

    The plaintiff appealed this decision to the Board of Veterans Appeals (“Board”); and after a hearing, the appeal was denied on August 6, 1980. … Frazier v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 672 F.2d 150, 168 (D.C.Cir.1982).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • POBLETE v. Goldberg

    680 F. Supp. 2d 18 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 29, 2009

    As required by Fox v. … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C.1977).

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Holston v. Vance-Cooks

    District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 5, 2013

    See Allen v. … Date: November 5, 2013 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • A Love of Food I, LLC v. Maoz Vegetarian USA, Inc.

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 22, 2013

    .”); see also Buruca v. Dist. of Columbia, 902 F. Supp. 2d 75, 79 n.1 (D.D.C. 2012); United States v. Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc., 285 F.R.D. 133, 135-36 (D.D.C. 2012); Brooks v. Clinton, 841 F. … See Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., 285 F.R.D. at 136 (“If the party was not diligent, the inquiry should end.”) (quoting Johnson v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Portland Adventist Medical Center v. Heckler

    561 F. Supp. 1092 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 13, 1983

    . §§ 1395f(b); 1395x(b), (e); 1395x(v)(l)(A). … (the Board). 42 U.S.C. § 1395oo(a).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Steffan v. Cheney

    733 F. Supp. 115 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 21, 1989

    Major Funk instructed plaintiff to make this request to *117 the Academic Board. On April 1 the Academic Board convened to consider plaintiffs case. … See Bois v. Marsh, 801 F.2d at 466 n. 5; Simpson v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • U-Ahk-Vroman-Sanchez v. United States Department of Defense

    District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 4, 2021

    Stewart v. Sackley, 251 F. Supp. 3d 138, 156 (D.D.C. 2017) (cleaned up); see also Fred Meyer Stores, Inc. v. NLRB, 865 F.3d 630, 638 (D.C. … V.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Association of Waterfront Employers v. Chao

    District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 27, 2009

    the Benefits Review Board instituted its own rule requiring that decisions and orders issued by the Board use claimants’ initials. 4 See Electronic Freedom of Information Act Amendments of 1996, Pub. … See Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 302-03 (1979).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Grell v. Trump

    District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 12, 2018

    Grell’s complaint also vaguely sketches a claim under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), seeking review of an Army Board for Correction of Military Records (“ABCMR”) determination. … Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). A.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Karcher v. Islamic Republic of Iran

    District Court, District of Columbia · May 7, 2025

    Brown, and Ryan A. … Brown, and Ryan A. Balmer. B.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Gonzalez v. Bolger

    486 F. Supp. 595 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 7, 1980

    See Brown v. Biglin, 454 F.Supp. 394, 399 (E.D.Pa.1978); Hochstadt v. Worcester Foundation for Experimental Biology, 425 F.Supp. 318, 324 (D.Mass.), affirmed, 545 F.2d 222 (1st Cir. 1976). … See Brown v. Ralston Purina Co., 557 F.2d 570 (6th Cir. 1977); Hochstadt v. Worcester Foundation for Experimental Biology, 545 F.2d 222 (1st Cir. 1976); Garrett v.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Grant v. Spirit Cruises, LLC

    District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 16, 2017

    This is no easy task as much of the factual recitation is jumbled, and what actually happened on board the ship is not easily discerned. Plaintiff, who served in the U.S. … See Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 152 (D.C. Cir. 2015). Rule 12(b)(6)’s pleading standard is “not meant to impose a great burden upon a plaintiff,” Dura Pharm., Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Upmc Mercy v. Sebelius

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 10, 2011

    SEC v. … Indeed, the Board’s decision is so vague that it is largely unclear what the Board ultimately concluded, let alone why. In such cases, meaningful judicial review is difficult. Benvenuti v. Dep’t of Defense, 587 F.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Federal Prescription Service, Inc. v. American Pharmaceutical Ass'n

    484 F. Supp. 1195 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 14, 1980

    See also National Society of Professional Engineers v. United States, 435 U.S. 679 , 98 S.Ct. 1355 , 55 L.Ed.2d 637 (1978); Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. … See California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking Unlimited, supra, 404 U.S. at 513 , 92 S.Ct. at 613 ; Israel v.

    Reversed in part, on other grounds by Federal Prescription Service, Inc. v. American Pharmaceutical Ass'n, 663 F.2d 253 (1981)Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Olsen v. Albright

    990 F. Supp. 31 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 22, 1997

    See, e.g., Chan v. … Tao v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.