Case law

Independence Federal Savings Bank v. Bender

326 F. Supp. 2d 36 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 9, 2004

He unsuccessfully sued the Bank in December 2003 to force a special shareholders meeting to remove most of the Board. Bender v. Parks, No. 03-2485(RMC). … Davenport v. Int’l Bhd. Of Teamsters, 166 F.3d 356, 360 (D.C.Cir.1999); see also Serono Lab. v. Shalala, 158 F.3d 1313, 1317-1318 (D.C.Cir.1998).

Butler v. California State Disbursement Unit

990 F. Supp. 2d 8 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 28, 2013

See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply with the F ederal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. l987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). As drafted, the complaint fails to comply with the minimal pleading standard set forth in Rule 8(a), and it will be dismissed.

Saunders v. Caldera

193 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 19, 2001

Contractors of Am. v. … Thus, in Los Angeles v.

United States Ex Rel. Davis v. District of Columbia

591 F. Supp. 2d 30 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 23, 2008

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). … District of Columbia Armory Board, 863 F.2d 1013 (D.C.Cir.1988), where the court permitted a case against an independent entity (the Armory Board) to proceed, that case involved a plaintiff seeking declaratory and injunctive

Pettiford v. Secretary of the Navy

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2011

14 Calloway v. … ”); Poole v.

Hunter v. Corrections Corp. of America

441 F. Supp. 2d 78 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 28, 2006

Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 64, 67 (D.C.Cir.2003); Holy Land Found, for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C.Cir.2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . … Steele v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, 355 F.3d 1204, 1210 (10th Cir.2003) (noting that “it is the prisoner who can best assert the relationship between his administrative grievance and court filing”); Brown v.

Johnson v. Gonzales

418 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 1, 2006

Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 64, 67 (D.C.Cir.2003); Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C.Cir.2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . … Warren, 353 F.3d at 39 ; Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . B.

Ortiz v. Secretary of Defense

842 F. Supp. 7 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 14, 1993

In Mullen v. … See also, Poindexter v.

Nationstar Mortgage v. Rfb Properties, LLC

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2024

Tapp v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth., 306 F. Supp. 3d 383, 391 (D.D.C. 2016) (Brown Jackson, J.) (quoting Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Dep’t of Energy, 888 F. Supp. 2d 189, 191 (D.D.C. 2012)). … See M&T Bank v. Brown, No. 19-cv-00578 (JMC), 2022 WL 7003740, at *2 (D.D.C. Oct. 12, 2022); Reverse Mortg. Solutions, Inc. v.

Amiri v. Securitas Security Services USA, Inc.

35 F. Supp. 3d 41 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 1, 2014

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … Brown v. Georgetown Univ. Hosp. Medstar Health, 828 F. Supp. 2d 1, 6 (D.D.C. 2011) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted).

Beaumont Independent School District v. United States of America

944 F. Supp. 2d 23 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 10, 2013

On December 27, 2012, BISD issued a notice of deadline to file applications to run for Board seats. … See Allen v. State Bd. of Elections, 393 U.S. 544, 558–59 (1969). Despite the language in its complaint, BISD is not currently seeking to implement “voting changes occasioned by” In re Rodriguez.

Gatore v. United States Department of Homeland Security

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 6, 2025

Fund, Inc. v. Reilly, 1 F.3d 1254, 1258 (D.C. Cir. 1993) (quoting Brown v. Stackler, 612 F.2d 1057, 1059 (7th Cir. 1980)). … Fund, 1 F.3d at 1258 (quoting Brown, 612 F.2d at 1059), and therefore, must be denied.

Preferra Insurance Company Risk Retention Group v. National Association of Social Workers, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 25, 2025

NASW then replaced most of ASI’s “very experienced” Board members, including Mr. Benedetto. Id. ¶ 41–43. The new ASI Board then terminated nearly all of the NASWIC Board of Directors, including Mr. Benedetto. … Joel v. Howard Univ., No. 24-cv-1655, 2025 WL 358769, at *1 (D.D.C.

Evanson v. United States

878 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 22, 1995

See Evanson v. Dealy-Browning, et al., No. 92-1549-HO at 3 (D.Or. May 3, 1993) (order granting defendants’ motion to dismiss). … Dealy-Browning is entitled to absolute immunity in this action.

Matthews v. District of Columbia

730 F. Supp. 2d 33 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 9, 2010

Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 , 127 S.Ct. 1955 , 167 L.Ed.2d 929 (2007) (quoting Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 47 , 78 S.Ct. 99 , 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957)); accord Erickson v. … Plaintiffs’ failure to describe in their complaint any particular conduct by Officers Bracket, Brown, Jackson-Maulfair, Melby, Nguyen, or Sowers precludes them from proceeding on this theory.

Wheeler v. Azar

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 29, 2022

Wheeler sought a second opinion of the recommendation from Mark Brown, Little’s supervisor. Id. at 26–27 (emails between Wheeler and Brown); Def.’s SMF ¶ 7. … Scott v. Harris, 550 U.S. 372, 378 (2007) (quoting United States v. Diebold, Inc., 369 U.S. 654, 655 (1962) (per curiam)).

Kittner v. Gates

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 28, 2010

Defendants rely on Brown v. Gen. Serv. Admin., 425 U.S. 820, 96 S.Ct. 1961, 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976), to argue that Title VII preempts Kittner’s constitutional claim. … However, it does not follow logically that the absence of the issue in Brown compels the conclusion that the Brown holding is not applicable to the facts in Neely.

Marshall v. District of Columbia

392 F. Supp. 1012 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 11, 1975

Braunfeld v. Brown, supra, 366 U.S. 599 at 603 , 81 S.Ct.. 1144 at 1146, 6 L.Ed.2d 563 . … However, in the recent decision of Brown v. D. C. Transit System, Inc., No. 73-2089 (D.C.

Mittleman v. United States Treasury

773 F. Supp. 442 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 29, 1991

Brown-Bey v. United States, 720 F.2d 467, 469 (7th Cir.1983); Bruce v. United States, 621 F.2d 914 , 916 n. 2 (8th Cir.1980); Ely v. … Hobson v.

Gordon v. Office of the Architect of the Capitol

928 F. Supp. 2d 196 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 8, 2013

See Ricks, 449 U.S. at 501 n.2 (official letter from the President of the Board of 10 Trustees of the employer college); Saunders v. … Stewart, 352 F.3d at 429; see Brown v. Small, 437 F. Supp. 2d 125, 134–35 (D.D.C. 2006) (Walton, J.)