Case law

Metroil, Inc. v. ExxonMobil Oil Corp.

724 F. Supp. 2d 70 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 20, 2010

Holy Land Found, for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C.Cir.2003); Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). … Warren v. District of Columbia, 353 F.3d 36, 39 (D.C.Cir.2004); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . “Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements, do not suffice.”

Mori v. Department of the Navy

917 F. Supp. 2d 60 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 18, 2013

See Miller v. … board members.”

Allied Pilots Association v. American Airlines, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 30, 2010

10 United Steelworkers of Am. v. … Postal Serv. v. Am.

Payne v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 29, 2011

See id. at 1276; Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). B. … Brown v. Aramark Corp., 591 F.

United States v. Canty

297 F. Supp. 853 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 10, 1969

Contee v. … Brown v. United States, 125 U.S.App.D.C. 43 , 365 F.2d 976, 979 (1966).

Hoffman v. District of Columbia

643 F. Supp. 2d 132 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 17, 2009

Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 64, 67 (D.C.Cir.2003); Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C.Cir.2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . … See Brown v.

Dana Farber Cancer Institute v. Burwell

216 F. Supp. 3d 49 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 24, 2016

“The final decision of the [Board] is subject to judicial review and may be set aside under the terms of the [APA].” Eagle Healthcare, Inc. v. Sebelius, 969 F. … Hosp. of Monterey Peninsula v.

Morrison v. Honorable Secretary of Defense

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 5, 2011

Cir. 1989); see also Musengo v. White, 286 F.3d 535, 538 (D.C. Cir. 2002); Cone v. Caldera, 223 F.3d 789, 793 (D.C. Cir. 2000). … See Quinn v. District of Columbia, 740 F.

Empire Health Foundation v. Burwell

209 F. Supp. 3d 261 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 19, 2016

Ctr., Inc. v. Sebelius, 37 F. … Both sides agree that this “if” signals that reinstatement of any appeal would be “discretionary with the Board.” Opp. at 19; Reply at 9 (agreeing appeal is in Board’s “discretion”).

Blevins v. Orr

553 F. Supp. 750 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 15, 1982

In challenging that refusal, Blevins is precluded from arguing that his personnel file was inaccurate or incomplete when considered by the FY 75 Selection Board because the decision in Blevins v. … Such claims of impropriety concerning selection boards are not ripe for judicial determination until administrative remedies are exhausted, subsequent to an AFBCMR ruling. See Knehans v.

Grell v. Trump

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 12, 2018

Grell’s complaint also vaguely sketches a claim under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), seeking review of an Army Board for Correction of Military Records (“ABCMR”) determination. … Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). A.

Doyle v. England

193 F. Supp. 2d 202 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 29, 2002

In the absence of clear and persuasive evidence to the contrary, courts should presume that the Secretary and selection boards performed fairly and lawfully. See Boyd v. … See Nation v.

Palumbo v. Tele-Communications, Inc.

157 F.R.D. 129 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 26, 1994

International Electronics Corp. v. Flanzer, 527 F.2d 1288, 1293 (2nd Cir.1975). See also Aetna Casualty and Surety Co. v. … Kingsepp v. Wesleyan University, 142 F.R.D. 597, 599 (S.D.N.Y.1992) (quoting Amos v. Board of Directors, 408 F.Supp. 765, 774 (E.D.Wis.1976)).

Quainoo v. Holder

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 10, 2013

Powell v. McCormack, 395 U.S. 486, 496 (1969). … Date: July 10, 2013 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District

Norris v. District of Columbia Government

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 21, 2010

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NICOLE NORRIS, Plaintiff, v. … MEMORANDUM OPINION Nicole Norris brings this action against the Board of Trustees of the University of the District of Columbia (“Board”)1 alleging reverse race discrimination in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and

Herrod v. Peoples Drug Stores, Inc.

417 F. Supp. 747 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 20, 1976

Unemployment Compensation Board’s conduct. … Federation of Civic Associations v.

Johnson v. Veneman

569 F. Supp. 2d 148 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 6, 2008

See Bowden v. United States, 106 F.3d 433, 437 (D.C.Cir.1997) (citing Brown v. GSA, 425 U.S. 820, 832-33 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976)). … V.

In Re Vitamins Antitrust Litigation

305 F. Supp. 2d 100 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 18, 2004

Marovitz, Britt Miller, Mayer, Brown & Platt, Chicago, IL, Catherine J. Hertzig, Jonathan Shiffman, Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw, D. Stuart Meiklejohn, Stacey R. … NOTES [1] See Thomas v.

Cunningham v. United National Bank of Washington

710 F. Supp. 861 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 4, 1989

First, one of the board members has testified that it was less than clear to her whether the board formally voted to fire Ms. … Ridgewells Caterer, Inc. v. Nelson, 688 F.Supp. 760, 764 (D.D.C.1988).

Charlton v. Donley

611 F. Supp. 2d 73 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 1, 2009

See Smalls v. … See Kreis v. Sec’y of Air Force, 866 F.2d 1508, 1511 (D.C.Cir.1989). It is established that military records correction boards’ decisions are subject to judicial review under the APA. See Dickson v.