Case law

Kingston Constructors, Inc. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

930 F. Supp. 651 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 7, 1996

See Granite-Groves v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, 845 F.2d 330, 333 (D.C.Cir.1988). … See, e.g., Rattigan v.

Bors v. Allen

607 F. Supp. 2d 204 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 15, 2009

Cobell v. Norton, 391 F.3d *210 251, 258 (D.C.Cir.2004). … Qualls v. Rumsfeld, 357 F.Supp.2d 274, 279 (D.D.C.2005) (citing Bois v. Marsh, 801 F.2d 462 , 468 (D.C.Cir.1986)).

Ramos v. United States Department of Justice

682 F. Supp. 2d 20 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 21, 2010

INTRODUCTION This matter comes before the court on the pro se plaintiffs motion for recusal and motion to vacate. 1 The plaintiff brought suit challenging the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“the Board”) to … Comm’ns Co. v. Am. Tel. & Tel.

Allen v. CSX Transportation, Inc.

784 F. Supp. 906 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 14, 1992

See Rastall v. CSX Corp., 696 F.Supp. 683, 684 (D.D.C.1988); see also Air Line Dispatchers Ass’n v. National Mediation Board, 189 F.2d 685 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 849 , 72 S.Ct. 77 , 96 L.Ed. 641 (1951). … In Rastall v.

In Re Any & All Funds & Assets in Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. Acct 8870792 in Name of Tiger Eye Investments Ltd.

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 10, 2009

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN RE: Any and all funds or other assets in Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. … See United States v. Philip Morris, Inc., 314 F.3d 612, 617 (D.C. Cir. 2003) (citing Washington Metro. Area Transit Comm'n v. Holiday Tours, Inc., 559 F.2d 841, 843 (D.C. Cir. 1977)).

McConnell v. Howard University

621 F. Supp. 327 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 28, 1985

See Smith v. Kent State University, 696 F.2d 476 (6th Cir.1983); Stastny v. Board of Trustees of Central Washington University, 32 Wash.App. 239 , 647 P.2d 496, 502, 506-07 (1982), cert. denied, 103 S.Ct. 1528 (1983). … As in Williams v.

Canal Refining Co. v. Corrallo

616 F. Supp. 1035 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 2, 1985

See Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 290-94, 316-18 , 99 S.Ct. 1705, 1711-13, 1725-28 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979). … Id. at 746-47; see also Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, supra, 441 U.S. at 318 , 99 S.Ct. at 1726 . Second, the procedures here were not “severely defective” in any event. See National Organization for Women v.

Villarreal-Dancy v. United States Department of the Air Force

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 26, 2021

authority, see Buckley v. … See Lucia v. SEC, 138 S.

Cone v. Caldera

46 F. Supp. 2d 3 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 18, 1999

See Castañeda v. … See also Small v.

DeLoach v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc.

132 F. Supp. 2d 22 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 30, 2000

Kafack v. Primerica Life Ins. Co., 934 F.Supp. 3, 5 (D.D.C.1996) (citing Van Dusen v. Barrack, 376 U.S. 612 , 84 S.Ct. 805 , 11 L.Ed.2d 945 (1964)); Chung v. Chrysler Corp., 903 F.Supp. 160, 162 (D.D.C.1995). … ("RJR”), Brown & Williamson Tobacco Co. ("Brown & Williamson”), and Lorillard Tobacco Co (''Loril-lard,”). 3 . Plaintiffs first filed their class complaint on February 16, 2000.

Lopez v. Touchup Cleaning Services LLC

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 3, 2020

Because Lopez has adequately demonstrated the defendants’ liability and that she is entitled to monetary relief, the Court will enter default judgments against Touchup Cleaning, Milton Bell, Leon Brown, Sr., and Leon Brown … Here, Lopez alleges that Milton Bell, Leon Brown, Sr., and Leon Brown, Jr. were owners, officers, directors and/or members of Touchup Cleaning and were substantially involved in Touchup Cleaning’s operations.

DISTRICT HOSP. PARTNERS, LP v. Sebelius

794 F. Supp. 2d 162 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 5, 2011

If the Board determines that it lacks the authority to decide the question, it will certify the question for “expedited judicial review.” See id.; see also Heartland Reg’l Med. Ctr. v. … . § 405.1842 (a)(1) (provider may seek review of “a legal question relevant to a specific matter at issue in a Board appeal” (emphasis added)); see also Shalala v. Ill.

Higbee v. Billington

290 F. Supp. 2d 105 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 30, 2003

Russell v. Principi, 257 F.3d 815, 818-19 (D.C.Cir.2001) (quoting Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 457 (D.C.Cir.1999)). An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion. … See Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 457 (D.C.Cir.1999).

Akron & Barberton Belt Railroad v. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen

254 F. Supp. 306 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 19, 1966

National Mediation Board, 320 U.S. 297 , 64 S.Ct. 95 , 88 L.Ed. 61 ; Southern Pacific Co. v. … National Mediation Board, D.C., 223 F.Supp. 951 ; International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America v.

Association of Administrative Law Judges, Inc. v. Heckler

594 F. Supp. 1132 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 10, 1984

See generally, Butz v. Economou, 438 U.S. 478, 513-14 , 98 S.Ct. 2894, 2914-15 , 57 L.Ed.2d 895 (1978); Ramspeck v. … See Baker v. Heckler, 730 F.2d at 1150 .

United States v. Sutton

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 17, 2022

United States v. Sutton, Crim. No. 21-0598, 2022 WL 1202741, at *12 (D.D.C. Apr. 22, 2022). … Hylton-Brown’s crash and death. Although the arrest reports might possibly illustrate Mr.

Morgan v. District of Columbia

618 F. Supp. 754 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 20, 1985

Curry-Bey v. Jackson, 422 F.Supp. 926, 932 (D.D.C.1976). … Cosgrove v. Smith, 697 F.2d 1125, 1130 (D.C.Cir.1983).

Washburn v. Court Ordered Benefits Section

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 11, 2023

See Watson v. D.C. Water & Sewer Auth., 249 F. Supp. 3d 462, 464 (D.D.C. 2017); Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 152 (D.C. Cir. 2015). A. … The act created the Merit Systems Protection Board (“MSPB”), a “quasi-judicial agency” that adjudicates some civil-service-related disputes. See Zummer v.

Shinogee Ex Rel. Duffy v. Fanning

234 F. Supp. 3d 39 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 13, 2017

benefits based on the Board of Veterans’ Appeals’ decision. … Board’s prior action, and (2) the Board had previously reconsidered the matter.

Kidney Center of Hollywood v. Shalala

63 F. Supp. 2d 51 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 30, 1999

See ICC v. Bhd. of Locomotive Engineers, 482 U.S. 270, 284-85 , 107 S.Ct. 2360 , 96 L.Ed.2d 222 (1987) (citing Outland v. CAB, 284 F.2d 224, 227 (D.C.Cir.1960)).. See also Stone v. … FEC, 711 F.2d 279, 283 (D.C.Cir.1983); Kessenich v. CFTC, 684 F.2d 88, 91 (D.C.Cir.1982); Cities of Batavia, Naperville, et. al. v. FERC, 672 F.2d 64, 72-73 (D.C.Cir.1982); Microwave Communications, Inc. v.