Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersdcd

8,912 results

0.28s

  • Information Systems & Networks Corp. v. United States Department of Health & Human Services

    970 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 11, 1997

    Defendants, as federal agencies, are immune from suit unless the government has expressly waived that immunity. Transohio Sav. Bank v. Director, Office of Thrift Supervision, 967 F.2d 598, 606 (D.C.Cir.1992). … Furthermore, it, and OAO, challenge the fact that ISN could ever qualify as an “offeror”.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Osage Nation v. United States Department of Interior

    District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 17, 2025

    , which courts may render only after jurisdiction has been established.”); Leopold v. … Contrary to plaintiff’s assertions that Congress “did not establish any prerequisites for submitting” a final offer, see Pl.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Uni-Top Asia Investment Limited v. Sinopec International Petroleum Exploration and Production Corporation

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 26, 2022

    Uni-Top’s petition also relies on SIPC’s structure to establish venue. … [in] which the foreign state is not entitled to immunity either under [the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act] or under any applicable international agreement.” 28 U.S.C. § 1330(a).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Aguilar v. Salazar

    626 F. Supp. 2d 36 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 18, 2009

    A “genuine issue” is one whose resolution could establish an element of a claim or defense and, therefore, affect the outcome of the action. … A nonmoving party, however, must establish more than “the mere existence of a scintilla of evidence” in support of its position. Id. at 252 , 106 S.Ct. 2505 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Peterson v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland

    330 F. Supp. 424 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 22, 1971

    The joint bank accounts were to be established in the Union Trust Company, and on June 25, 1963, plaintiff and Oxford executed a “Resolution to Establish a Joint Account” on a preprinted form supplied by Union Trust. … This clearly could not have been the intent of the parties.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Elam v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF UNIVERSITY OF DC

    530 F. Supp. 2d 4 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 18, 2007

    But as detailed above, the Court is satisfied that plaintiff has demonstrated that he was qualified for the position in the context of establishing a prima facie case. … Even if plaintiff were able to establish that Dean Petty’s assessment of his qualifications was erroneous and that he was qualified for the position of Full Professor, that would not be enough to survive summary judgment

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Humphries v. Newman

    District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 2, 2022

    This Court thus refuses to pierce Defendants’ cloak of immunity and must dismiss any defamation claim here. … Code establish no causes of action. See D.C. Code Ann. § 2-1201.01 (stating the D.C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Salazar v. Dc

    District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 5, 2010

    U.S. 418 (1987), held that tenants could bring a private lawsuit under § 1983 for violations of the Public Housing Act where a provision of that statute “conferred entitlements ‘sufficiently specific and definite to qualify … The statute speaks in terms that are clearly mandatory, as it says that states “must . . . provide.” 42 U.S.C. § 1396a(a)(43); 42 U.S.C. § 1396d(r) (describing services in

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Ass'n of Recycling Industries v. Secretary of Commerce

    494 F. Supp. 158 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 3, 1980

    Standing A dispute does not fall within the subject-matter jurisdiction of federal courts unless it qualifies as a “case” or “controversy” within the meaning of article III, and it cannot so qualify unless the plaintiff has … Except with respect to section 7(c), the Act does not single out recyclables for special treatment, so an equal protection attack would clearly fail.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Molineaux v. United States

    788 F. Supp. 33 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 2, 1992

    If there are not enough slots, even qualified officers may have to be terminated. … Congress clearly did not want to hinder the Secretary’s ability to structure the Foreign Service to address the foreign policy needs as he understood them to be.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Star Route Mail Contractors Association, Inc. v. United States Postal Service

    223 F. Supp. 3d 14 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 19, 2016

    It is well settled that the Government has waived its immunity from suit against the Postal Service. … 19 Postal Service’s immunity from suit. 39 U.S.C. § 401(1).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Doe v. Rumsfeld

    501 F. Supp. 2d 186 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 21, 2007

    Six plaintiffs, known as John Doe # 1 through # 4 and Jane Doe # 1 and # 2, brought this action to challenge the lawfulness of the defendants’ Anthrax Vaccination Immunization Program (“AVIP”). … Under the Circuit’s standard, these entries are clearly too vague. One possible remedy is to reduce plaintiffs’ fee by certain percentage because of the vague entries.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • United States v. Anaconda Co.

    445 F. Supp. 486 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 15, 1977

    Certainly such systems qualify as “articles.” … The Commission is clearly intended to override inadequate and conflicting state and local regulation. 15 U.S.C. § 2051 .

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Printing Industry of Metropolitan Washington, D.C., Inc.

    92 F.R.D. 51 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 20, 1981

    Red Cross, 78 F.R.D. 73, 77 (D.D.C.1978): the case is before the Court on a motion for class certification, and therefore, the proof required here need not establish liability. … This is evidenced by the fact that the two unions have separate counsel, who are eminently qualified.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Rothe v. Astrue

    766 F. Supp. 2d 5 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 22, 2011

    Finally, a letter from Procter notes that plaintiff “has supplied documentation that clearly states a diagnosis of: Depression, Fibromyalgia, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, and Chemical Sensitivity.” (AR at 273.) D. … The claimant must, support his claim of impairment with “[ojbjective medical evidence” that is “established by medically acceptable clinical or laboratory diagnostic techniques.” 42 U.S.C. § 423 (d)(5)(A).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Paulison

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 22, 2009

    May 29, 2008) (holding that the plaintiff demonstrated pretext in part by establishing a causal connection). … This argument is devoid of merit, as the evidence clearly demonstrates that there was not a separate GS 15 position distinct from the VA 228 position.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Chamber of Commerce of United States

    645 F. Supp. 604 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 25, 1986

    Defendant has moved for summary judgment on the grounds that first, plaintiff fails to establish a prima facie case of age discrimination, and second, even if plaintiff has established a prima facie case, defendant has articulated … Regardless of whether plaintiff could have presented a prima facie case, summary judgment clearly is warranted on his ADEA claim as defendant has fulfilled its burden of producing evidence showing that plaintiff was terminated

    Cited 45 timesPublished
  • Sanford v. Howard University

    415 F. Supp. 23 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 26, 1976

    A brilliant, exceptionally qualified black student was given course credit without an examination. … Also clearly in point is the holding of another circuit in an opin *30 ion by Judge Stevens, now Mr.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Modderno v. King

    871 F. Supp. 40 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 19, 1994

    The Plaintiff states, in opposition, that the allegations in her Complaint are “clearly sufficient” to state a claim under Section 504. Opposition, at 2. … DISCUSSION Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act prohibits a federal agency or a federally funded program from denying benefits to handicapped individuals solely on the basis of their disability. 3 To establish a prima facie

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Clinton Memorial Hospital v. Sullivan

    783 F. Supp. 1429 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 30, 1992

    The Secretary was authorized to promulgate regulations “providing] for the establishment of limits on ... costs ... to be recognized as reasonable.” Id. § 1395x(v)(l). … The Secretary clearly set forth his intent to provide for objective criteria that would be easy to apply. The accompanying regulation accomplishes this objective.

    Cited 8 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.