Case law

Dana Farber Cancer Institute v. Burwell

216 F. Supp. 3d 49 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 24, 2016

“The final decision of the [Board] is subject to judicial review and may be set aside under the terms of the [APA].” Eagle Healthcare, Inc. v. Sebelius, 969 F. … Hosp. of Monterey Peninsula v.

Maddox v. Elize

83 F. Supp. 2d 113 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 23, 1999

See, Sutherland v. District of Columbia Board of Parole, 366 F.Supp. 270 (D.D.C.1973); Blair-Bey v. … Circuit in Blair-Bey v.

Saha v. Teladoc Health Medical Group, P.A.

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2025

For example, in Browning v. Clinton, the D.C. … But Browning’s claim survived because she identified a specific example of a prospective publishing contract that was allegedly terminated due to the defendant’s conduct. Id. Similarly, in Banneker Ventures, LLC v.

Williams-Jones v. LaHood

656 F. Supp. 2d 63 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 18, 2009

Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 64, 67 (D.C.Cir.2003); Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C.Cir.2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . … Warren v. District of Columbia, 353 F.3d 36, 40 (D.C.Cir.2004); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . C.

Byrum v. Winter

District Court, District of Columbia · May 10, 2011

Bois v. Marsh, 801 F.2d 462, 468 (D.C. … Lujan v.

Ramos v. United States Department of Justice

588 F. Supp. 2d 38 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 1, 2008

Firestone v. Firestone, 76 F.3d 1205, 1208 (D.C.Cir.1996) (per curiam); McDowell v. Calderon, 197 F.3d 1253, 1255 (9th Cir.1999). … Responsibility v. U.S.

In re Boeing Airplane Co.

23 F.R.D. 264 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 9, 1959

The Court of Appeals, in Smith v. … The cases relating to discovery of documents, such as Safeway Stores v. Reynolds 2 upon which Government counsel relies, are distinguishable.

Fire Fighters Ass'n Dist. of Columbia v. Barry

742 F. Supp. 1182 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 13, 1990

Keyishian v. Board of Regents, 385 U.S. 589, 605-06 , 87 S.Ct. 675, 684 , 17 L.Ed.2d 629 (1967). … In Brown v.

Palumbo v. Tele-Communications, Inc.

157 F.R.D. 129 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 26, 1994

International Electronics Corp. v. Flanzer, 527 F.2d 1288, 1293 (2nd Cir.1975). See also Aetna Casualty and Surety Co. v. … Kingsepp v. Wesleyan University, 142 F.R.D. 597, 599 (S.D.N.Y.1992) (quoting Amos v. Board of Directors, 408 F.Supp. 765, 774 (E.D.Wis.1976)).

Morrison v. Honorable Secretary of Defense

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 5, 2011

Cir. 1989); see also Musengo v. White, 286 F.3d 535, 538 (D.C. Cir. 2002); Cone v. Caldera, 223 F.3d 789, 793 (D.C. Cir. 2000). … See Quinn v. District of Columbia, 740 F.

Alexiou v. McGrath

101 F. Supp. 421 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 19, 1951

On November 8, 1949, this Board reversed the decision of the Acting Commissioner. … Adel v. Shaughnessy, 2 Cir., 1950, 183 F.2d 371 ; Matrapasqua v. Shaughnessy, 2 Cir., 1950, 180 F.2d 999 ; Vergas v. Shaughnessy, D.C.N.Y.1951, 97 F.Supp. 335 .

Penny v. U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 21, 2009

P. 56(c); see also Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322 (1986); Diamond v. Atwood, 43 F.3d 1538, 1540 (D.C. Cir. 1995). … Greene v. Dalton, 164 F.3d 671, 675 (D.C. Cir. 1999); Harding v. Gray, 9 F.3d 150, 154 (D.C. Cir. 1993).

United States v. Washington

38 F. Supp. 2d 21 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 5, 1999

Valentine Brown, an acknowledged expert in the illegal drug trade. … But see United States v. Walker, 960 F.2d 409 (5th Cir.)

City of New York v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Silicon Valley Bank

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 27, 2026

The Bank Board was also empowered to appoint a receiver for the “reorganization” or “liquidation” of these associations should they fail. Id. (cleaned up). … See Davis v. Brown, 94 U.S. 423, 427 (1876) (noting the receiver “stands in [the bank’s] shoes”); Sekhar v.

General Railway Signal Co. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

625 F. Supp. 22 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 29, 1985

Compare Excavation Construction, Inc. v. WMATA, Civil Action No. 83-1125, slip op. at 4-5 (D.D.C. Apr. 19, 1985). … See General Railway Signal Co. v. WMATA, 664 F.2d 296 (D.C.Cir.1980) (per curiam). The Court concludes that prejudgment interest on the $975,952 is due to GRS as of April 17, 1984.

Cunningham v. United National Bank of Washington

710 F. Supp. 861 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 4, 1989

First, one of the board members has testified that it was less than clear to her whether the board formally voted to fire Ms. … Ridgewells Caterer, Inc. v. Nelson, 688 F.Supp. 760, 764 (D.D.C.1988).

Kimmel v. Gallaudet University

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 4, 2009

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002) (internal quotation marks omitted). … State Comm. of D.C. v. Bebchick, 706 A.2d 569, 573 (D.C. 1998) (quoting Carr v. Brown, 395 A.2d 79, 84 (D.C. 1978)); see McManus v.

Citizen Potawatomi Nation v. Salazar

624 F. Supp. 2d 103 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 12, 2009

However, because the Board’s collateral estoppel decision is upheld, the Court need not reach the Board’s alternative reasoning. See United States v. … In Ramah Navajo School Board, Inc. v.

Merck & Co., Inc. v. United States Department of Health and Human Services

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 8, 2019

Brown & Williamson, 529 U.S. at 133. … Council v. EPA, 777 F.3d 456, 464 (D.C. Cir. 2014). V.

MPAC, LLC v. District of Columbia

181 F. Supp. 3d 81 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 24, 2014

Alcoholic Beverage Control Board (Control Board) reviewed the MPD suspension order on May 21, 2014, and served MPAC with a Notice of Summary Suspension; the Control Board took witness testimony and reviewed an investigative … MPAC relies on Lightfoot v.