Case law

Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Fda

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2009

Brown v. Sec'y of the Army, 78 F .3d 645, 648 (D.C. Cir. 1996). … Brown, 78 F .3d at 649.

District of Columbia v. Straus

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 14, 2009

S.A. v. District of Columbia, 543 F. … In Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v.

Mitchell v. Del Toro

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 26, 2024

special board.” … Circuit has concluded that the statute governing “[c]orrection of military records,” 10 U.S.C. § 1552(a), “fairly exudes deference” to the Secretary and the Board. Kreis v.

United States v. Tesoro Petroleum Corp.

503 F. Supp. 868 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 23, 1980

Browning, 435 F.2d at 100 . … See La Rouche, Browning.

Kyne v. Leedom

148 F. Supp. 597 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 19, 1956

Board for the Third Region. 5. … Farmer v. United Electrical Workers, 93 U.S.App.D.C. 178 , 211 F.2d 36 , 40, certiorari denied 347 U.S. 943 , 74 S.Ct. 638 , 98 L.Ed. 1091 ; DePratter v. Farmer, 98 U.S.App.D.C. 74 , 232 F.2d 74, 75 . 2.

General Railway Signal Co. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

625 F. Supp. 22 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 29, 1985

Compare Excavation Construction, Inc. v. WMATA, Civil Action No. 83-1125, slip op. at 4-5 (D.D.C. Apr. 19, 1985). … See General Railway Signal Co. v. WMATA, 664 F.2d 296 (D.C.Cir.1980) (per curiam). The Court concludes that prejudgment interest on the $975,952 is due to GRS as of April 17, 1984.

Powell v. Nigro

543 F. Supp. 1044 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 28, 1982

State Board of Law Examiners, 438 F.2d 699, 704 (8th Cir. 1971); Keenan v. Board of Law Examiners, 317 F.Supp. 1350 , 1355 n.5 (E.D.N.C.1970). … See Feldman v. State Board of Law Examiners, 438 F.2d at 704 ; Chaney v. State Bar of California, 386 F.2d at 967-68 .

Kearby v. Social Security Office

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 30, 2009

Brown v. … See Kearby v. Brown, Civ. Action No. 09-2000. Rather than direct the assignment of this mostly incoherent complaint as related to the pending action, the Court will dismiss it under Fed. R. Civ. P. 8.

Ekemezie v. Cvs Pharmacy, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 5, 2018

On March 25, 2016, Ekemezie sent Local 400’s Executive Board a letter appealing the decision. Pl.’s Ex. G. … Herron v. Fannie Mae, 861 F.3d 160, 173 (D.C. Cir. 2017) (quoting Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002)).

Baker v. Google LLC

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 26, 2024

See Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 152 (D.C. … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977) (JJS).

Christian v. Secretary of the Army

847 F. Supp. 2d 68 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 12, 2012

Review by Military Boards 1. … Review Board (“ADRB”).

Hall v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.

559 F. Supp. 2d 38 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 18, 2008

Williams v. … See, e.g., Reblan v.

Anderson v. United States Parole Commissioner

917 F. Supp. 2d 81 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 18, 2013

Davis v. Henderson, 652 A.2d 634, 635 (D.C. 1995). In short, “parole eligibility was determined by a . . . Board that operated with nearly complete discretion.” Wilson v. Fulwood, 772 F. … Given the “totally unfettered” discretion under which the Parole Board operated in those days, see Sellmon v. Reilly, 561 F.

Flynn v. Rusk

219 F. Supp. 709 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 12, 1963

Communist Party v. Subversive Activities Control Board, 93 U.S.App.D.C. 66 , 223 F.2d 531, 565 (1954). … It was also stated in Communist Party v. Subversive Activities Control Board, 367 U.S. 1, 86-87 , 81 S.Ct. 1357, 1404-1405 , 6 L.Ed.2d 625 , “The [Subversive Activities Control] Act is -not a bill of attainder.

Abbot v. Bralove

81 F. Supp. 532 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 9, 1948

Hicks v. Bigelow, D.C.Mun.App., 55 A.2d 924 . … The current case is likewise distinguished from Soule v. McCluskey, Municipal Court, City of Los Angeles, filed August 17, 1948 [not yet reported] and Woods v.

First American Corp. v. Al-Nahyan

17 F. Supp. 2d 10 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 13, 1998

In 1981, Clifford was offered, and accepted, the Chairmanship of the FAC Board. Altman also joined the Board at that time. … Hank Brown, The BCCI Affair: A Report to the Sen.

Si v. Laogai Research Foundation

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 21, 2013

(internal quotation marks and citation omitted)); U.S. v. Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc., 800 F. … Date: August 21, 2013       Ketanji Brown Jackson               KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

McDougall v. Widnall

20 F. Supp. 2d 78 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 1998

See Miller v. Lehman, 801 F.2d 492, 496 (D.C.Cir.1986). … Wronke v. Marsh, 787 F.2d 1569, 1576 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 853 , 107 S.Ct. 188 , 93 L.Ed.2d 121 (1986); Walker v. Shannon, 848 F.Supp.250 (D.D.C.1994); Dorl v.

Costello v. District of Columbia

826 F. Supp. 2d 221 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 1, 2011

Under the Supreme Court’s decision in Monell v. … [Board of Comm’rs of Bryan Cty. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 410 (1997)].

Otiji v. Heyman

47 F. Supp. 2d 6 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 18, 1998

The initial decision of the MSPB denied plaintiffs request for corrective action, and the Board subsequently denied his petition for review. … It is also, in view of the Federal *8 Circuit’s careful management of so-called “mixed” cases, see Williams v. Department of Army, 715 F.2d 1485 (Fed.Cir.1983), scarcely credible.