Case law

Hunt v. United States Department of Agriculture

740 F. Supp. 2d 41 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 23, 2010

.”); Harrison v. … See LeBlanc v.

Movers' & Warehousemen's Ass'n of America v. United States

227 F. Supp. 249 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 26, 1964

Co. v. Southern R. Co., 372 U.S. 658 , 83 S.Ct. 984 , 10 L.Ed.2d 52 (1963). … But see -National Motor Freight. *251 Traffic Assn. v. United States, 372 U.S. 246 , 83 S.Ct. 688 , 9 L.Ed.2d 709 (1963). . Cf. S. S. W., Inc. v.

State of Alabama Department of Human Resources v. United States Department of Health & Human Services

478 F. Supp. 2d 85 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 23, 2007

Back Country Horsemen of America v. … Thomas Jefferson University v. Shalala, 512 U.S. 504 , 114 S.Ct. 2381 , 129 L.Ed.2d 405 (1994); Martin v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, 499 U.S. 144 , 111 S.Ct. 1171 , 113 L.Ed.2d 117 (1991).

Durant v. District of Columbia Government

932 F. Supp. 2d 53 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 25, 2013

See Durant v. … Faragher v.

Miller v. Lehman

603 F. Supp. 164 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 28, 1985

Mullane v. … Benvenuti v.

Greene v. Wilson

150 F. Supp. 958 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 29, 1957

It was at this time, upon the abolishment of the Industrial Employment Review Board, and immediately prior to the establishment of the new Boards, that the communication complained of was written in conformity to paragraph … Wong Yang Sung v. McGrath, 1950, 339 U.S. 33, 50 , 70 S.Ct. 445, 454 , 94 L.Ed. 616 . Order accordingly.

Trustees of the Electrical Workers Local No. 26 Pension Trust Fund v. Trust Fund Advisors, Inc.

266 F.R.D. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 12, 2010

. & Title Co. v. … See United States v.

Greater Southeast Community Hospital v. Heckler

602 F. Supp. 764 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 15, 1985

See Villa View Community Hospital, Inc. v. Heckler, 728 F.2d 539, 541-42 (D.C.Cir.1984); Psychiatric Institute of Washington, D.C., Inc. v. Schweiker, 669 F.2d 812, 814 (D.C.Cir.1981). … See Psychiatric Institute of Washington, D.C., Inc. v. Schweiker, 669 F.2d 812 (D.C.Cir.1981). 2 .

Genesis Health Ventures, Inc. v. Sebelius

798 F. Supp. 2d 170 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 22, 2011

Ctr., Inc. v. … Ctr. v.

Palisades Citizens Ass'n v. Weakly

166 F. Supp. 591 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 22, 1958

State Appeals Board, 213 Md. 407 , 132 A.2d 451 ; Strickland v. Knight, 1904, 47 Fla. 327 , 36 So. 363 ; Baltimore Retail Liquor Package Stores Ass’n, Inc., v. … Holding in favor of standing to sue: Bagby v. Bowen, 1935, 180 Ga. 214 , 178 S.E. 439 (taxpayer); Frank v.

Pan American Airways Corp. v. Air Line Pilots Assoc., Int'l.

206 F. Supp. 2d 12 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 19, 2002

Air Transport Ass’n of America v. … See, e.g., Air Line Pilots Assoc. v.

M. A. Schapiro & Co. v. Securities & Exchange Commission

339 F. Supp. 467 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 24, 1972

In Bristol-Myers Co. v. … [Bristol-Myers Co. v. F. T. C., swpra.'] This exemption was considered in Grumman Aircraft Engineering Corp. v. Renegotiation Board, 138 U.S.App.D.C. 147 , 425 F.2d 578 (1970).

Bilal-Edwards v. United Planning Organization

15 F. Supp. 3d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 21, 2013

K (Declaration of Jemeka Brown (“Brown Deck”)) ¶¶ 4, 6-7). *8 “[I]n late 2009 or early 2010, [] Rorie spoke with DeVita Lanham, another [Division] Case Manager, about changing positions in the [Division].” Id. ¶ 15. … “This request did not involve a change in position or a reduction in pay,” and was a request “to temporarily help with James Creek until the new employee was on board.” Id.

Kalantar v. Lufthansa German Airlines

276 F. Supp. 2d 5 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 10, 2003

Dec. 21, 1993) (plaintiff injured while waiting for shuttle bus was not embarking as she was still in a public area, and not close to boarding); Kantonides v. … But see Baker v.

Hall v. Wormuth

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 16, 2024

It considers “whether the [Board’s] decision making process was deficient, not whether [the] decision was correct.” Kreis v. Sec’y of Air Force, 406 F.3d 684, 686 (D.C. Cir. 2005); see also Lakner v. … Though it appears this evidence did not outweigh the factors favoring separation, “it is well within the [Board]’s discretion to find[] some pieces of evidence more persuasive than others.” Hayes v.

United Transportation Union v. Burlington Northern, Inc.

325 F. Supp. 1125 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 18, 1971

In Virginian Railway Co. v. … Beverage Co. v.

Bowie v. Ashcroft

283 F. Supp. 2d 25 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 22, 2003

Brown, 199 F.3d at 455 . … Brown, 199 F.3d at 457 .

Bell v. Ivory

966 F. Supp. 23 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 11, 1997

Moss v. Stockard, 580 A.2d 1011, 1024 (D.C.1990). … Sorrells v. Garfinckel's, 565 A.2d 285, 289 (D.C.1989); Alfred A. Altimont, Inc. v.

Van v. Am. Airlines, Inc.

370 F. Supp. 3d 218 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 30, 2019

These boards have "exclusive primary jurisdiction" over such disputes. Pa. R.R. Co. v. Day , 360 U.S. 548 , 550, 79 S.Ct. 1322 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1422 (1959). … ."); Allen v. United Transp.

McKesson Corp. v. Islamic Republic of Iran

520 F. Supp. 2d 38 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 18, 2007

Piper v. … Hebah v.