Case law

Chatman v. United States Department of Defense

270 F. Supp. 3d 184 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 13, 2017

This case concerns the jurisdiction of yet another review board — the Department’s Physical Disability Board of Review (“PDBR”). … Trudeau v. FTC, 456 F.3d 178, 184 (D.C. Cir. 2006).

United States v. Shark

158 F. Supp. 2d 43 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 31, 2001

Valentine Brown (“Brown”), a police detective, in violation of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 , 83 S.Ct. 1194 , 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963). … United States v.

14pnwdc LLC v. Zapata-Mercado

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 8, 2026

II v. U.S. Bank Nat’l Ass’n, 715 F. … Arshad’s continued participation on the board.

Armenian Assembly of America, Inc. v. Cafesjian

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 9, 2010

See Clancy v. … v.

Colombini v. Meink

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 20, 2026

She claims that the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (“AFBCMR” or “the Board”) acted arbitrarily and capriciously when it denied her request for reconsideration of whether she should have been deemed … Finally, as Colombini points out, the Board is based in Maryland. 1 Based on Colombini’s complaint, which generally focuses on decisions of the Department and the Board, the decision-making process likewise appears to

Lind v. McHugh

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 7, 2014

Musengo v. White, 286 F.3d 535, 537 (D.C. … P&V Enters. v. U.S. Army Corps of Eng’rs, 516 F.3d 1021, 1026 (D.C. Cir. 2008) (citation omitted).

Kight v. United States

850 F. Supp. 2d 165 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 23, 2012

The district court is not to function as a “super correction board” by reweighing the evidence. Charette v. Walker, 996 F. Supp. 43, 50 (D.D.C. 1998). … “When a correction board fails to correct an injustice clearly presented in the record before it, it is acting in violation of its mandate.” Roth v. United States, 378 F.3d 1371, 1381 (Fed. Cir. 2004) (quoting Yee v.

Carter v. PANAMA CANAL COMPANY

314 F. Supp. 386 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 20, 1970

In Abbott v. … In Anderson v.

Lemus v. Grover Montano Corp.

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 14, 2026

Wise v. United States, 145 F. … G&E Real Est., Inc. v. McNair, 2022 WL 17356860, at *8 (D.D.C. Dec. 1, 2022) (citing Exec. Sandwich Shoppe, Inc. v. Carr Realty Corp., 749 A.2d 724, 736–37 (D.C. 2000); Bedell v.

Biochem Pharma, Inc. v. Emory University

148 F. Supp. 2d 11 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 30, 2001

(“Board”). … Smiths Industries Medical Systems, Inc. v. Ballard Medical Products, Inc., 728 F.Supp. 6, 7 (D.D.C.1989) (citing Stewart Organization, Inc. v.

Baptist Memorial Hospital-Golden Triangle v. Leavitt

536 F. Supp. 2d 25 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 21, 2008

Laningham v. U.S. … See, e.g., Novacare v.

Stoddard v. Carlin

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 29, 2011

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … See, e.g., Bettencourt v. Bd. of Registration in Med., 904 F.2d 772, 782 (1st Cir. 1990) (quasi-judicial absolute immunity was proper for medical licensing board members); Ashbrook v.

Consumers Union of United States, Inc. v. Miller

84 F.R.D. 240 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 17, 1979

Plaintiff’s complaint presents the purely legal question of whether the Federal Reserve Board, in promulgating the regulation, acted in excess of its statutory authority. In Toilet Goods Ass’n v. … Warth v. Seldin, 422 U.S. at 515 , 95 S.Ct. at 2213 . The recent decision of the district court in Health Research Group v.

Hitachi Koki Co., Ltd. v. Dudas

556 F. Supp. 2d 41 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 29, 2008

Putman v. Dudas, 539 F.Supp.2d 414, 419 (D.D.C.2008). … (See PL’s Opp’n 4 (citing Nystrom v.

National Ass'n of Life Underwriters v. Clarke

736 F. Supp. 1162 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 8, 1990

Bancorp, USBO’s parent, is regulated by the Federal Reserve Board (sometimes the “Board”), which administers the BHCA. 5 See Whitney National Bank v. … (citing Board of Governors v. Dimension Financial Corp., 474 U.S. 361, 373-74 , 106 S.Ct. 681, 688-89 , 88 L.Ed.2d 691 (1986); TVA v.

Palisades Citizens Ass'n v. Weakly

166 F. Supp. 591 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 22, 1958

State Appeals Board, 213 Md. 407 , 132 A.2d 451 ; Strickland v. Knight, 1904, 47 Fla. 327 , 36 So. 363 ; Baltimore Retail Liquor Package Stores Ass’n, Inc., v. … Holding in favor of standing to sue: Bagby v. Bowen, 1935, 180 Ga. 214 , 178 S.E. 439 (taxpayer); Frank v.

Boyd v. Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton, LLP

79 F. Supp. 3d 153 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 5, 2015

Carden v. Arkoma Assoc, 494 US. 185, 189 (1990) (holding that limited partnerships do not follow the citizenship rules established for corporations); Johnson-Brown v. 2200 M St. LLC, 257 F. … Brown v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp, 26 F. Supp. 2d 74, 77 (D.D.C. 1998) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted).

Maunz v. Fanning

77 F. Supp. 3d 230 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 12, 2015

Occidental Eng’g Co. v. INS, 753 F.2d 766, 769–70 (9th Cir. 1985). … Cone v. Caldera, 223 F.3d 789, 793 (D.C. Cir. 2000); see also Orloff v.

Harris v. United States Supreme Court

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 23, 2012

Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443, 540 (1953) (Jackson, J., concurring). Following Justice Jackson’s maxim, this court lacks any power to review the Supreme Court’s actions. See In re Marin, 956 F.2d 339, 340 (D.C. … .”)); Brown v. U.S. Supreme Court, 2008 WL 5082141, at *1 (D.D.C.

Germonprez v. Director of Selective Service

318 F. Supp. 829 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 8, 1970

Gregory et al., plaintiffs, v. Lewis B. Hershey et al., defendants, Civil Action No. 33057. The *830 defendant Lewis B. Hershey was the then Director of Selective Service. … The judgment was preceded by an opinion (Exhibit A to verified complaint) reported in Gregory v.