Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.99s
156 F. Supp. 3d 208 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 15, 2016
Albino v. United States, 78 F. Supp. 3d 148, 167 (D.D.C. 2015), citing Frizelle, 111 F.3d at 177; see also Rudo v. Geren, 818 F. … See Musengo v. White, 286 F.3d 535, 539 (D.C.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLeongini v. National Association of Water Companies
District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 25, 2021
See Brady v. … Brown, ECF No. 4-4, at 1.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCytologic, Inc. v. Biopheresis Gmbh
682 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 15, 2010
Laningham v. U.S. … See, e.g., Conservolite, Inc. v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedAhuruonye v. Department of the Interior
District Court, District of Columbia · May 31, 2022
Kittner v. Gates, 708 F.Supp.2d 47, 52 (D.D.C. 2010) (quoting Brown v. Gen. Servs. … Forkkio v. Powell, 306 F.3d 1127, 1130 (D.C. Cir. 2002) (citing Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C. Cir. 1999)); see also Carroll v. England, 321 F. Supp. 2d 58, 68 (D.D.C. 2004).
Cited 0 timesPublishedJackson v. Correctional Corporation of America
564 F. Supp. 2d 22 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 14, 2008
See Brown v. Dist. of Columbia, Civil Action No. 04-2195, 2005 WL 3276267 , at *3 (D.D.C. … Brown v. Argenbright Security, Inc., 782 A.2d 752, 757 (D.C.2001) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted); see also District of Columbia v.
Cited 55 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · May 8, 2026
P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678–79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668–71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).
Cited 0 timesPublished112 F. Supp. 147 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 4, 1953
The defendant Robert V. … Brady v.
Cited 6 timesPublished['Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Department of the Navy']
25 F. Supp. 3d 131 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 17, 2014
In making this decision, the SSA had assistance from a Source Selection Board (“SSB”), which is a team of agency employees that is responsible for “evaluat[ing] proposals[] submitted in response to a solicitation for renewable … DATE: March 17, 2014 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge
Cited 49 timesPublished237 F. Supp. 313 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 12, 1965
The pertinent testimony adduced before the Police and Firemen’s Retirement and Relief Board was the medical report of Dr. Victor H. Esch, Member of the Board of Police and Fire Surgeons; Dr. G. … See Crawford v. McLaughlin, 109 U.S.App. D.C. 264, 286 F.2d 821 . Counsel for the plaintiff will prepare the appropriate order not inconsistent with this opinion.
Cited 8 timesPublishedUnited States v. Philip Morris Inc.
156 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 27, 2001
See Dowling v. … Reynolds Tobacco Co., Brown & Williamson Tobacco Co., Lorillard Tobacco Company, The Liggett Group, Inc., American Tobacco Co., Philip Morris Cos., B.A.T. Industries p.l.c.
Cited 11 timesPublishedRhodes v. United States Department of the Army
District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 21, 2025
Ethyl Corp. v. Browner, 989 F.2d 522, 524 (D.C. Cir. 1993); see also Carpenters Indus. Council v. Salazar, 734 F. Supp. 2d 126, 132 (D.D.C. 2010); Sierra Club v. Van Antwerp, 560 F. Supp. 2d 21, 23 (D.D.C. 2008). … See Borud v. Emmert, No. 24-1211-TNM, 2025 WL 894417, at *3 (D.D.C.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCatholic Health Initiatives v. Sebelius
658 F. Supp. 2d 113 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2009
DOT, 843 F.2d at 1452; see also Humane Society v. Kempthorne, 579 F.Supp.2d at 13 . III. DISCUSSION Plaintiffs challenge the Board’s decision disallowing reimbursement. See Compl. ¶¶ 115-17. … While the PRM provision itself would be due less deference than a Board decision, see Public Citizen, Inc. v.
Reversed on other grounds by Catholic Health Initiatives v. Sebelius, 617 F.3d 490 (2010)Cited 14 timesPublishedAPCC Services, Inc. v. AT & T CORP.
254 F. Supp. 2d 135 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 28, 2003
United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 751 v. Brown Group, Inc., 517 U.S. 544, 551 , 116 S.Ct. 1529 , 134 L.Ed.2d 758 (1996). … Workers Union Local 751 v. Brown Group, Inc., 517 U.S. 544 , 116 S.Ct. 1529 , 134 L.Ed.2d 758 (1996) [hereinafter “Brown Group ”]. (See Pis.’ Opp. at 19-20.) Plaintiffs’ reliance is, however, misplaced.
Cited 7 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Aug 14, 2025
LLC v. Consumer Fin. Prot. … Berry v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedKingman Park Civic Association v. Gray
27 F. Supp. 3d 142 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 14, 2014
See Ekwem v. … For Washington’s Riverfront Parks v. Thompson, 451 A.2d 1177, 1183 (D.C. 1982) (citing Shiflett v. Dist. of Columbia Board of Appeals and Review, 431 A.2d 9, 10-11 (D.C. 1981)).
Cited 73 timesPublished104 F. Supp. 651 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 6, 1952
Carr v. Corning, Superintendent of Public Schools (Browne Junior High School Parent-Teacher Ass’n v. Magdeburger,) 86 U.S.App.D.C. 173 , 182 F.2d 14 . … As our Court of Appeals, speaking through Judge Prettyman, said in the Carr and related case, supra [ 86 U.S.App.D.C. 173 , 182 F.2d 20 ], “The Board of Education in the District undoubtedly has faced for many years acute
Cited 0 timesPublished232 F. Supp. 3d 148 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 3, 2017
Cherry v. Brown-Frazier-Whitney, 548 F.2d 965, 969 (D.C. Cir. 1976) (“[Wlhether there has been a ‘failure to prosecute’ is to be determined upon a consideration of all pertinent circumstances .... ”). … At the time that it affirmed the written description rejections, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board was known as the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences. See Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, Pub. L.
Cited 2 timesPublished530 F. Supp. 2d 24 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 27, 2007
A reviewing court will ‘uphold a decision of less than ideal clarity if the [board’s] path may reasonably be discerned.’ ” Dickson v. Sec’y of Defense, 68 F.3d 1396, 1404 (D.C.Cir.1995) (quoting Bowman Transp., Inc. v. … Co., Inc. v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedLebron v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
585 F. Supp. 1461 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 21, 1984
Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S. 1, 50-53 , 96 S.Ct. 612, 650-51 , 46 L.Ed.2d 659 (1976). However, “[untruthful speech, commercial or otherwise, has never been protected for its own sake.” Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. … See, e.g., Tomei v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedMerchia v. Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 20, 2024
Supp. 3d 14, 19 (D.D.C. 2018) (citing Richardson v. United States, 193 F.3d 545, 548 (D.C. Cir. 1999)); see Brown v. Hill, 573 F. App’x 3 (D.C. … Brit UW, Limited v. Manhattan Beachwear, LLC, 235 F. Supp. 3d 48, 54, 60 (D.D.C. 2017) (quoting Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 919 (2011)) (other citations omitted)).
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna