Case law

Bullock v. Spencer

112 F. Supp. 147 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 4, 1953

The defendant Robert V. … Brady v.

Chen v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 5, 2024

Supp. 3d 84, 93 (D.D.C. 2016), and “plead factual matter that permits [the Court] to infer more than the mere possibility of misconduct,” Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., 789 F.3d 146, 150 (D.C. … See Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). It also assists the court in determining whether it has jurisdiction over the subject matter.

Merchia v. Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 20, 2024

Supp. 3d 14, 19 (D.D.C. 2018) (citing Richardson v. United States, 193 F.3d 545, 548 (D.C. Cir. 1999)); see Brown v. Hill, 573 F. App’x 3 (D.C. … Brit UW, Limited v. Manhattan Beachwear, LLC, 235 F. Supp. 3d 48, 54, 60 (D.D.C. 2017) (quoting Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 919 (2011)) (other citations omitted)).

Baystate Medical Center v. Leavitt

545 F. Supp. 2d 20 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2008

Ctr. v. … See Camp v.

Cytologic, Inc. v. Biopheresis Gmbh

682 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 15, 2010

Laningham v. U.S. … See, e.g., Conservolite, Inc. v.

Simmons v. Blinken

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 9, 2024

Counts II through V, meanwhile, focus on the Board’s various denials of Plaintiff’s motions. Count II alleges that the Board erred in denying Simmons’s revised motion for attorney fees on July 23, 2020. … Count V This leads us finally to Count V.

Wright v. Eugene & Agnes E. Meyer Foundation

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 29, 2021

Brown v. Sessoms, 774 F.3d 1016, 1022 (D.C. Cir. 2014) (quoting Forkkio v. Powell, 306 F.3d 1127, 1130 (D.C. Cir. 2002)); see also Domino’s Pizza, Inc. v. … Bray v. RHT, Inc., 748 F. Supp. 3, 5 (D.D.C. 1990); see also Ndondji v. InterPark Inc., 768 F.

Air Line Pilots Association International v. Federal Express Corporation

139 F. Supp. 3d 320 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 28, 2015

.”); Air Line Pilots Ass’n v. … Minor disputes are within the exclusive jurisdiction of system boards. See Consol. Rail Corp. v. Ry. Labor Execs.

Aviel v. Gor

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 14, 2025

LLC v. Consumer Fin. Prot. … Berry v.

Brewer v. D.C. Financial Responsibility & Management Assistance Authority

953 F. Supp. 406 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 17, 1997

Board of Trustees of U.D.C., 794 F.Supp. 420, 422 (D.D.C.1992); Rasul v. District of Columbia, 680 F.Supp. 436, 439 (D.D.C.1988); Dougherty v. Barry, 604 F.Supp. 1424, 1442 (D.D.C.1985). 4 b. … See Keyishian v. Board of Regents, 385 U.S. 589, 592 , 87 S.Ct. 675, 678 , 17 L.Ed.2d 629 (1967); see also Bois v. Marsh, 801 F.2d 462 , 466 & n. 6 (D.C.Cir.1986).

Kingman Park Civic Association v. Gray

27 F. Supp. 3d 142 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 14, 2014

See Ekwem v. … For Washington’s Riverfront Parks v. Thompson, 451 A.2d 1177, 1183 (D.C. 1982) (citing Shiflett v. Dist. of Columbia Board of Appeals and Review, 431 A.2d 9, 10-11 (D.C. 1981)).

Lynch v. Tobriner

237 F. Supp. 313 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 12, 1965

The pertinent testimony adduced before the Police and Firemen’s Retirement and Relief Board was the medical report of Dr. Victor H. Esch, Member of the Board of Police and Fire Surgeons; Dr. G. … See Crawford v. McLaughlin, 109 U.S.App. D.C. 264, 286 F.2d 821 . Counsel for the plaintiff will prepare the appropriate order not inconsistent with this opinion.

Perry v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters

118 F. Supp. 3d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 15, 2015

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … Bush v.

Aircraft & Diesel Equipment Corp. v. Hirsch

62 F. Supp. 520 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 28, 1945

In the case of Coffman v. … National Labor Relations Board v. Mackay Radio & Telegraph Co., 304 U.S. 333 , 58 S.Ct. 904 , 82 L.Ed. 1381 . In the case of Arrow Distilleries, Inc., v.

Jackson v. Correctional Corporation of America

564 F. Supp. 2d 22 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 14, 2008

See Brown v. Dist. of Columbia, Civil Action No. 04-2195, 2005 WL 3276267 , at *3 (D.D.C. … Brown v. Argenbright Security, Inc., 782 A.2d 752, 757 (D.C.2001) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted); see also District of Columbia v.

Newborn v. National Government Services Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 27, 2015

) TERRY NEWBORN, ) ) PLAINTIFF, ) ) V. … Date: January 27, 2015 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

Catholic Health Initiatives v. Sebelius

658 F. Supp. 2d 113 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2009

DOT, 843 F.2d at 1452; see also Humane Society v. Kempthorne, 579 F.Supp.2d at 13 . III. DISCUSSION Plaintiffs challenge the Board’s decision disallowing reimbursement. See Compl. ¶¶ 115-17. … While the PRM provision itself would be due less deference than a Board decision, see Public Citizen, Inc. v.

Kilpatrick v. Riley

98 F. Supp. 2d 9 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 27, 2000

Jarrell v. USPS, 753 F.2d 1088, 1091 (D.C.Cir.1985) (citing Brown v. GSA, 425 U.S. 820, 832-33 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976)). … See Jolly v. Listerman, 672 F.2d 935, 953 (D.C.Cir.1982); Childers v. Slater, 44 F.Supp.2d 8, 19 (D.D.C.1999); Brown v. Bentsen, 921 F.Supp. 1, 2 (D.D.C.1995); accord Norman v.

APCC Services, Inc. v. AT & T CORP.

254 F. Supp. 2d 135 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 28, 2003

United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 751 v. Brown Group, Inc., 517 U.S. 544, 551 , 116 S.Ct. 1529 , 134 L.Ed.2d 758 (1996). … Workers Union Local 751 v. Brown Group, Inc., 517 U.S. 544 , 116 S.Ct. 1529 , 134 L.Ed.2d 758 (1996) [hereinafter “Brown Group ”]. (See Pis.’ Opp. at 19-20.) Plaintiffs’ reliance is, however, misplaced.

Medford v. District of Columbia

691 F. Supp. 1473 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 13, 1988

Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483, 493 , 74 S.Ct. 686, 691 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954) (“... it is doubtful that any child may reasonably be expected to succeed in life if he is denied the opportunity of an education. … Congress gave meaning to Brown for handicapped children when it enacted the EHA in 1975 and “conferr[ed] upon disabled students an enforceable substantive right to public education.” Honig v.