Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersdcd

10,000+ results

3.59s

  • Brown v. Handy

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 30, 2010

    Brown to face the wall for a second search. Id. ¶ 25. During the second search, DSO Short allegedly “raised Brown’s suit jacket and her shirt so that Brown’s bare skin was exposed.” Id. … “DSO Short then pulled Brown’s bra away from her breasts and above her shoulders, fully exposing Brown’s breasts.” Id. During the search, DSO Short allegedly touched Ms. Brown’s breasts.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Sankula

    District Court, District of Columbia · May 5, 2021

    Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). … Baloch v. Kempthorne, 550 F.3d 1191, 1196 (D.C. Cir. 2008).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Parker v. Brown

    District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 19, 2010

    Def.’s Ex. 1; but see Pl.’s Opposition to Defendant (Officer Brown’s) Reply in Support of His Motion to Dismiss at 1-2 [Dkt. … . § 2672; see Stuto v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Alves

    District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 8, 2009

    See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Nonetheless,pro se plaintiffs must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Farruggia

    District Court, District of Columbia · May 7, 2021

    District & Bankruptcy UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Court for the District of Columbia FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LEWIS ROSS BROWN, … See Melton v. District of Columbia, 85 F.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Carranza

    District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 16, 2009

    Brown’s conditions or terms of employment. See Velikonja v. Gonzales, 501 F. … Passenger Corp. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. McCarthy

    District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 4, 2009

    P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1950 (2009); Oralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Norris

    District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 21, 2009

    DISTRICT COURT Jerome Julius Brown, Sr., et al., ) ) Plaintiff(s), ) ) … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497,498 (D.D.C. 1977). The Complaint fails to meet the requirements of Rule 8(a). The complaint does not make clear whether there is one plaintiff or multiple plaintiffs.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Prince v. Rice

    453 F. Supp. 2d 14 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 18, 2006

    Stella v. Mineta, 284 F.3d 135, 145 (D.C.Cir.2002) (quoting Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C.Cir.1999)). … Brown v. Marsh, 777 F.2d 8, 13 (D.C.Cir.1985).

    Cited 39 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Queen

    District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 2, 2009

    BROWN, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 09 0614 ELLIOTT QUEEN, ESQUIRE, Defendant. … See, e.g., Brady v. Livingood, 360 F.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Squires v. Brown

    District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 2, 2009

    (citation omitted); Fowler v. … Wilson v. Good Humor Corp., 757 F.2d 1293, 1297 n.3 (D.C. Cir. 1985). Mr. Squires has acknowledged Mr. Brown’s efforts to have a prototype of his invention built and the recruitment of Mr.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Poole v. Brown

    706 F. Supp. 74 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 14, 1989

    Koster v. … Co. v. M/V Nordic Regent, 654 F.2d 147 , 152 (2d Cir.1980). 4 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Hayden

    District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 27, 2021

    LOC’s motion for summary judgment on all of plaintiff’s claims was granted, see Brown v. Hayden, Civil Action No. 18-2561 (BAH), 2020 WL 6392746, at *1 (D.D.C. … (emphasis added) (alterations in original) (quoting Payne v. Salazar, 619 F.3d 56, 65 (D.C. Cir. 2010)); see also, e.g., Brown v. Marsh, 777 F.2d 8, 14 (D.C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Miller

    District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 5, 2009

    DISTRICT COURT' Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. tJ~ 1~92 JERRY D. MILLER, ESQ., Defendant. … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Plaintiffs complaint fails to accomplish the basic purpose of Rule 8(a).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Tomlinson

    District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 28, 2009

    See, e.g., Brown v. Tomlinson, Civil Action No. 03-1376, Order at 1 (D.D.C. Mar. 14, 2005) (denying Mr. Brown’s motion to enforce purported oral settlement agreement); Brown v. Tomlinson, 383 F. … Brown’s retaliation claim. V. DISCRIMINATION Mr.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Tomlinson

    District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 28, 2009

    See Complaint ¶ 3; Pl.’s Ex. 3, Affidavit of Christian Craig Brown (“Second Aff. of Brown”) at 1. … Id.; Pl.’s Ex. 2, Affidavit of Cristian Craig Brown at 1-2.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Levi

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 30, 2009

    Di§-tr`ict end Kevin Arthur Brown, Banl<rupt€¥ CW"?S Petitioner, 1 ' 0 €){ *‘,+ v. : CivilAction No. ou 190 l Troy Levi, Respondent. … As the court of appeals said in Garris v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Crenshaw v. Georgetown University

    23 F. Supp. 2d 11 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 4, 1998

    .”); Robinson v. … Glovinsky v.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Paulson

    District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 17, 2009

    Op. at 4-6 (discussing Brown v. Snow, 407 F. Supp.2d 61 (D.D.C. 2005) (Leon, J.)). The plaintiff filed this civil action on March 19, 2007. … Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C. Cir. 1999); Stewart v. Ashcroft, 352 F.3d 422, 428 (D.C. Cir. 2003); Carroll v. England, 321 F. Supp.2d 58, 68 (D.D.C. 2004).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Parker v. Brown

    706 F. Supp. 2d 125 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 19, 2010

    See County of Sacramento v. … . § 2672 ; see Stuto v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.