Case law

Hanson v. OFFICE OF SENATOR MARK DAYTON

535 F. Supp. 2d 25 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 15, 2008

Indeed, Judge Brown, in her concurring opinion in Fields v. … Judges Sentelle and Griffith joined Judge Brown’s concurring opinion.

Powell v. Castaneda

390 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 26, 2005

Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 64, 67 (D.C.Cir.2003); Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C.Cir.2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . … Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 455 (D.C.Cir.1999) (holding that an adverse employment action is a prerequisite to bringing a Title VII claim).

Jones v. Delaney

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 21, 2009

Kowal, 16 F.3d at 1276; see also Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). Plaintiff pleads under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, which provides a right of action for deprivation of civil rights. … See F.D.IC v.

National Ass'n of Concerned Veterans v. Secretary of Defense

487 F. Supp. 192 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 16, 1979

Annex Cl: Joint Motion and Stipulation of Settlement, Lipsman v. Brown, No. 76-1175 (D.D.C.Feb. 6, 1979). … The rules which plaintiffs seek to have published are contained in the stipulation settlement of Lipsman v. Brown, No. 76-1175 (D.D.C. Feb. 6,1978) (per Robinson, J.).

International Brotherhood of Teamsters Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Association of Flight Attendants

663 F. Supp. 847 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 29, 1987

Franchise Tax Board of California v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust, 463 U.S. 1, 8 , 103 S.Ct. 2841, 2845-46 , 77 L.Ed.2d 420 (1983). … Kalo Brick & Tile Co., 450 U.S. 311, 324 , 101 S.Ct. 1124, 1134 , 67 L.Ed.2d 258 (1981) (intent of Congress to regulate a field cannot be avoided by “artful pleading”); Brown v.

Gilberti v. Federal Reserve System

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 29, 2019

Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). … DATE: April 29, 2019 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

Marinette Marine Corp. v. Department of the Navy

527 F. Supp. 587 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 29, 1981

The government’s reliance on the two Court of Claims cases ignores the clear implication of the opinion by the Court of Appeals for this Circuit in Eastern Canvas Products, Inc. v. Brown, 580 F.2d 675 (D.C. Cir.1978). … See generally Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe, 401 U.S. 402, 416 , 91 S.Ct. 814, 823-24 , 28 L.Ed.2d 136 (1971); Ethyl Corp. v.

United States v. Zabavsky

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 21, 2022

Hylton-Brown’s conduct leading up to the collision. See United States v. Sanford Ltd., 841 F. Supp. 2d at 316. For example, Mr. Sutton requests “all evidence ” of Mr. … Supp. 2d at 318 (denying a bill of particulars where the entire conspiracy occurred on “a ship [] in the middle of the sea, [where] there is a finite number of people on board and a finite list of crew members”); but see

New York State Bar Ass'n v. Federal Trade Commission

276 F. Supp. 2d 110 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 11, 2003

Id. at 132, 120 S.Ct. 1291 (citing Brown v. Gardner, 513 U.S. 115, 118 , 115 S.Ct. 552 , 130 L.Ed.2d 462 (1994) (“Ambiguity is a creature not of definitional possibilities but of statutory context.”)). … Brown & Williamson, 529 U.S. at 125, 120 S.Ct. 1291 (citing 61 Fed.Reg. 44,397 (1996)).

Davis v. American Society of Civil Engineers

290 F. Supp. 2d 116 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 4, 2003

Defendant ASCE’s corporate structure includes a “Board of Direction” (“the Board”), to which the CEO reports, and an Executive Committee (“the Committee”) that exercises the Board’s delegated authority. Id. ¶ 8 . … Brown, 659 F.Supp. 541 , 544 n. 2 (W.D.Mo.1987) (determining that the plaintiffs factual assertions were sufficient to establish proper venue despite direct contradiction by the defendant). B.

Hunt v. Miller

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 10, 2020

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … Holdings, Inc. v. Tempnology, LLC, 139 S.

Ellis v. Chappell

230 F. Supp. 164 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 3, 1964

Johnson v. Wilkinson, 279 F.2d 683 (5th Cir. 1960); Teague v. Looney, 268 F.2d 506 (10th Cir. 1959); Groce v. Hudspeth, 121 F.2d 800 (10th Cir. 1941). And see Zerbst v. … See Stack v. Boyle, 342 U.S. 1 , 72 S.Ct. 1 , 96 L.Ed. 3 (1951); United States v. Foster, 278 F.2d 567 (2d Cir. 1960).

SWEDISH AMERICAN HOSPITAL v. Sebelius

691 F. Supp. 2d 80 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 5, 2010

Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 64, 67 (D.C.Cir.2003); Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C.Cir.2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . … Warren v. District of Columbia, 353 F.3d 36, 40 (D.C.Cir.2004); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . “Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by *85 mere conclusory statements, do not suffice.”

Hobson v. Hansen

265 F. Supp. 902 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 9, 1967

Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483, 493 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 . Defendants concede plaintiffs’ standing to contest the manner in which the Board administers the schools. … Mayor and City Council of Baltimore v. [Board of] Police [v. City of Baltimore] Board, 15 Md. 455 .

Miller v. ROSENKER

567 F. Supp. 2d 158 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 25, 2008

Plaintiff Richard Miller brings this action against Defendant Mark V. … Saltz v. Lehman, 672 F.2d 207, 209 (D.C.Cir.1982).

Ozark Mountain Regional Rehabilitation Center, Inc. v. Department of Health & Human Services, Provider Reimbursement Review Board

798 F. Supp. 16 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 16, 1992

Joseph’s Hospital of Kansas City v. Heckler, 786 F.2d 848 (8th Cir.1986); Alacare Home Health Servs. Inc. v. Sullivan, 891 F.2d 850 (11th Cir.1990). … See, e.g., Tucson Medical Ctr. v. Heckler, 611 F.Supp. 823 (D.D.C.1985), aff'd sub nom. Washington Hosp. Ctr. v. Bowen, 795 F.2d 139 (D.C.Cir.1986).

Fletcher v. District of Columbia

481 F. Supp. 2d 156 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 26, 2007

Brown v. Sec’y of Army, 78 F.3d 645, 648 (D.C.Cir.1996). If the United States has not waived sovereign immunity, the court must dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. First Va. Bank v. … Settles, 429 F.3d at 1105 ; Brown, 78 F.3d at 648 .

UNITED WESTERN BANK v. Office of Thrift Supervision

793 F. Supp. 2d 357 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 24, 2011

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). A. 12(b)(1) Motion to Dismiss Under Rule 12(b)(1), the plaintiff bears the burden of establishing jurisdiction by a preponderance of the evidence. See Lujan v. … Circuit’s opinion in Gaubert v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board, 863 F.2d 59 (D.C.Cir.1988).

Beg Investments, LLC v. Alberti

34 F. Supp. 3d 68 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2014

See e.g., Brown v. Nationsbank Corp., 188 F.3d 579, 587 (5th Cir. 1999); Cullinan v. Abramson, 128 F.3d 301, 308 (6th Cir. 1997); See also Wilkie v. … Ashcroft v.

Trifax Corp. v. District of Columbia

53 F. Supp. 2d 20 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 14, 1999

Harlow v. … Perkins v. Lukens Steel Co., 310 U.S. 113, 127 , 60 S.Ct. 869 , 84 L.Ed. 1108 (1940). Plaintiff cites to Board of Regents v.