Case law

Club 99, Inc. v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

457 A.2d 773 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 30, 1982

We cannot say that the Board’s invalid rationale represents a “determination of policy,” S.E.C. v. Chenery, supra, nor that it “infected the entire decision.” Dietrich v. Tarleton, supra. … Hence, we uphold the Board’s two-day suspension as mandated by the Board of Education regulation, based upon findings adequately supported in the record. Silverstone v.

Washington Press Club v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

476 A.2d 1107 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 31, 1984

well-established that “ ‘an agency’s interpretation of the statutes and regulations it administers will be sustained unless shown to be unreasonable or in contravention of the language or legislative history of the statute.’ ” Haight v. … District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, 439 A.2d 487, 491 (D.C.1981) (quoting DeLevay v. District of Columbia Rental Accommodations Commission, 411 A.2d 354, 359 (D.C.1980)).

Dupont Circle Citizens Ass'n v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

403 A.2d 314 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 20, 1979

P. v. … See D.C.Code 1973, § 1-1510; Kopff v. District of Columbia ABC Board, supra at 1383.

MCCORMICK & SCHMICK RESTAURANT CORPORATION v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL BOARD

144 A.3d 1153 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 11, 2016

Plaza Tenants Ass’n v. … Furthermore, the Board‟s interpretation treats the words “violated” and “violation” inconsistently. Cf. Dupont Circle Citizens Ass’n v.

Citizens Ass'n of Georgetown v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

316 A.2d 865 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 20, 1974

PAIR, Associate Judge: Brought here for review is the record of proceedings before the District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board (the Board) on application of Specialty Restaurants, Inc. … See also Brewington v. District of Columbia Bd. of App. & Rev., D.C.App., 299 A.2d 145 (1973); Woodridge Nursery School v. Jessup, D.C.App., 269 A.2d 199, 202 (1970).

Cornelious v. District of Columbia Employees' Compensation Appeals Board

704 A.2d 853 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 30, 1997

Kennedy v. District of Columbia, 654 A.2d 847, 853 (D.C.1994). … United States Dep’t of Labor v.

Citizens Committee for the D.C. Video Lottery Terminal Initiative v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics

860 A.2d 813 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 28, 2004

Board Exs. 1, 8; BOEE Ex. 69 at 32 (John Capozzi Complaints) Board Ex. 26 (J. Marcus Meeks and Norman L. Brown Complaints). … Number) Michael Brown Petition Not Live Oscar Brown Altered Affidavit Renee Brown False Cert. Of Address (No Teresa Buchanan Affidavit Wouldn’t Penta Burgess, Jr. False Cert.

In Re Angel

889 A.2d 993 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 22, 2005

This court referred the matters to the Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”) to determine whether identical, greater, or lesser discipline should be imposed as reciprocal discipline or whether the Board would elect … See In re Laibstain, 841 A.2d 1259 (D.C.2004), and In re Brown, 797 A.2d 1232 (D.C.2002).

Foggy Bottom Ass'n v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

445 A.2d 643 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 6, 1982

The standard to be applied by this court in reviewing agency decisions was articulated in Spevak v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, D.C. … Kopff v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, D.C.App., 381 A.2d 1372, 1387 (1977); Vestry of Grace Parish v.

Evans v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics

456 A.2d 804 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 1, 1982

Indeed, this court more than ten years ago expressed concern with the Board’s procedures and directed it to improve its performance. Mosley v. … Board of Elections of the District of Columbia, D.C.App., 283 A.2d 210 (1971).

Kartsonis v. District Unemployment Comp. Bd.

289 A.2d 370 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 27, 1972

See also Lee v. Brown, 148 So.2d 321, 323 (La.Ct.App.1963); Washington v. Administrator, 125 So.2d 27 (La.Ct.App. 1960). Cf. Palace Restaurant, Inc. v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, D.C.App., 271 A.2d 561 (1970). … District of Columbia Unemployment Compensation Board, supra . Cf. Spaulding v. Florida Industrial Commission, 154 So.2d 334 (Dist.Ct.App.Fla. 1963); Ciufo v. Brown, 148 So.2d 459 (La.Ct.App.1963); Boynton Cab Co. v.

Donnelly Associates, Ltd. Partnership v. District of Columbia Historic Preservation Review Board

520 A.2d 270 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 14, 1987

Moreover, we accord substantial weight to the Review Board’s determination that its procedures are fair. Mathews v. … Le Sueur County Board of Commissioners, 277 N.W.2d 404, 405 (Minn.1979); Barton Contracting Co. v. City of Afton, 268 N.W.2d 712 -16 (Minn.1978). But see Connecticut Fund for the Environment, Inc. v.

President of Georgetown College v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

837 A.2d 58 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 4, 2003

Inst. v. Miller, 301 N.Y. 189 , 93 N.E.2d 632, 636 (1950). In Rutgers State University v. … In Goodman v.

Hart v. Capital Traction Co.

35 App. D.C. 502 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 1, 1910

As this court, in the case of Capital Traction Co. v. Brown, 29 App. D. C. 473, *509 12 L.R.A. (N.S.) 831, 10 A. & E. Ann. … It is urged that the instruction here under consideration was given by the court in the case of Capital Traction Co. v. Brown, 29 App. D. C. 473, 12 L.R.A. (N.S.) 831, 10 A. & E. Ann.

Dupont Circle Citizens Ass'n v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

390 A.2d 1009 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 16, 1978

Stewart v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 305 A.2d 516, 518 (1973). … As we recognized in Dietrich v.

Shay v. District of Columbia, Board of Zoning Adjustment

337 A.2d 506 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 7, 1975

The Court has reviewed the findings and conclusions of the Board set forth in the supplemental record, and considered the memoranda filed by the *507 parties. … See Marjorie Webster Junior College, Inc. v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 309 A.2d 314 and Stewart v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 305 A.2d 516 .

Ray v. District of Columbia

535 A.2d 868 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 10, 1987

Lewis v. District of Columbia, 499 A.2d 911, 915 (D.C.1985). Prior case law has noted that the Act is, in effect, a worker’s compensation plan. Brown v. … Brown, supra, 451 A.2d at 76 .

Dupont Circle Citizens Ass'n v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

364 A.2d 610 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 24, 1976

Ibid.; Cassidy v. Baltimore County Board of Appeals, 218 Md. 418 , 146 A.2d 896 ; 2 Merrill, Notice, 384, 444. [Emphasis in original.] II. We turn now to a consideration of B.Z. A. … The Maryland Court of Appeals in Sullivan v.

Foster v. United States

615 A.2d 213 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 6, 1992

But see Rose v. … Co. v.

North Lincoln Park Neighborhood Ass'n v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

727 A.2d 872 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 8, 1999

The mere existence of evidence to the contrary, even if substantial, “does not allow this court to substitute its judgment for that of the Board.” Spevak v. … While the Board must give great weight to the concerns raised by the Association, “it is *878 not obliged to follow [the Association’s] recommendations or adopt its views.” 5 Upper Georgia Ave. Planning Comm. v.