Opinion

Shay v. District of Columbia, Board of Zoning Adjustment

  • 337 A.2d 506
  • 1975 D.C. App. LEXIS 440
Court
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Filed
May 7, 1975
Status
Published
On the bench
Gallagher, Kelly
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 19.3%

The opinion

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on for further consideration following the remand proceedings had pursuant to this Court’s order of March 13, 1975. The Court has reviewed the findings and conclusions of the Board set forth in the supplemental record, and considered the memoranda filed by the *507 parties. The Court is of the opinion that the Board’s findings and conclusions are supported by substantial evidence in the whole of the administrative record, and that the applicants have not met their required burden to obtain a special exception. See Marjorie Webster Junior College, Inc. v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 309 A.2d 314 and Stewart v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 305 A.2d 516 . Wherefore, it is

Ordered and adjudged that the order on review herein be, and the same hereby is, affirmed.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.