Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersdc

7,092 results

0.50s

  • Thomas v. United States

    914 A.2d 1 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 28, 2006

    State v. … In Brown v.

    Cited 138 timesPublished
  • Howard v. United States

    902 A.2d 127 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 6, 2006

    Lexis 210, at *9 (citing United States v. Watson, 697 A.2d 36, 38 (D.C.1997)) (quoting Holt v. United States, 675 A.2d 474, 478 (D.C.1996) (internal quotation marks omitted)); see also Peay v. … Id. at 124 , 120 S.Ct. 673 (citing Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47 , 99 S.Ct. 2637 , 61 L.Ed.2d 357 (1979)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Reyes v. United States

    933 A.2d 785 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 16, 2007

    Brady v. … See Brown v. United States, 840 A.2d 82, 89 (D.C.2004).

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Matter of JN

    406 A.2d 1275 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 15, 1979

    See State v. Brown, 21 Md. App. 91 , 318 A.2d 257 (Ct.Spec.App.1974) (year and a day rule, as part of the common law of England, adopted by Maryland in 1776; see also Louisville, Evansville and St. Louis R.R. v. … District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 343 A.2d 564, 567 (1975); Democratic Central Committee of the District of Columbia v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Comm'n, 158 U.S.App.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In Re AHB

    491 A.2d 490 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 10, 1985

    United States v. … Because you're wearing a brown jacket. Q. Okay. If I were to say that I'm wearing a tan shirt, would that be a lie or would that be the truth? A. The truth. Q. And why? A. Because you're wearing a tan shirt.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hicks-Bey v. United States

    649 A.2d 569 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 7, 1994

    See Gonzales v. … See State v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Hunt v. District of Columbia

    66 A.3d 987 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 2, 2013

    .”); Peltier v. … Donohoe v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Comford v. United States

    947 A.2d 1181 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 15, 2008

    Harris v. United States, 834 A.2d 106 , 115— 16 (D.C.2003) (quoting Johnson v. Leuthongchak, 111 A.2d 249, 250 (D.C.2001)). 7 . See Chaabi v. … Foreman v. United States, 792 A.2d 1043, 1052 (D.C.2002). 9 . Holmes v. United States, 580 A.2d 1259, 1263 (D.C.1990) (emphasis in original); see also Brown v.

    Cited 94 timesPublished
  • Lamont A. Biles v. United States

    101 A.3d 1012 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 23, 2014

    In Smith v. … Brown, 576 Fed.Appx. 145, 148 (4th Cir.2014) ("‘The Brady right ... exists to ... minimize the chance that an innocent person would be found guilty.’ ”).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Wolfe v. Fine

    618 A.2d 169 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 30, 1992

    See Braxton v. … Compare Brown v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Hutchison Bros. Excavating Co. v. District of Columbia

    511 A.2d 3 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 11, 1986

    See Hotel Association of Washington v. District of Columbia Minimum Wage and Industrial Safety Board, 318 A.2d 294, 305-07 (D.C.1974) (en banc); Chevy Chase Citizens Association v. … In Junghans v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • McNeil Pharmaceutical v. Hawkins

    686 A.2d 567 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 23, 1996

    v. … In Mampe v.

    Cited 56 timesPublished
  • Davis v. United States

    567 A.2d 36 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 28, 1989

    In Kennedy v. … See In re E.R.E., 523 A.2d 998, 1000 (D.C.1987); Brown v. United States, 388 A.2d 451, 456-458 (D.C.1978).

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • JAMES EARL BLACKMON v. DAVID D. LEWIS

    146 A.3d 1074 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 29, 2016

    Wages v. … Brown v. United States, 934 A.2d 930, 943 (D.C. 2007) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Counsel‟s arguments, even if ultimately unsuccessful, were reasonable and based on the evidence in the case.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Jones v. United States

    625 A.2d 281 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 13, 1993

    Tinker v. … See Acker v.

    Cited 36 timesPublished
  • United States v. Edwards

    430 A.2d 1321 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 8, 1981

    Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 305 , 82 S.Ct. 1502, 1512 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962). … In Nebraska Press Assoc. v.

    Cited 163 timesPublished
  • Baltimore v. District of Columbia

    10 A.3d 1141 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 6, 2011

    See Sears v. Catholic Archdiocese of Washington, 5 A.3d 653, 657 (D.C.2010); Andrade-Sorto v. Allstate Ins. … Id. at 36 (citing Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 569 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972)) (other citations and internal quotation marks omitted).

    Cited 41 timesPublished
  • Kirby Vining v. Executive Bd. of the DC Health Benefit Exchange Auth.

    District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 7, 2017

    EXECUTIVE BOARD OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HEALTH BENEFIT EXCHANGE AUTHORITY, ET AL., APPELLEES. … Miller v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Scholtz Partnership v. District of Columbia Rental Accommodations Commission

    427 A.2d 905 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 20, 1981

    Bradley v. Richmond School Board, 416 U.S. 696, 711 , 94 S.Ct. 2006, 2016 , 40 L.Ed.2d 476 (1974). … See Fleming v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Potomac Place Assoc., LLC v. Mendez

    District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 10, 2025

    Code § 42-3505.01; see also Suggs v. … Odeniran v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.