Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
7,092 results
0.50s
914 A.2d 1 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 28, 2006
State v. … In Brown v.
Cited 138 timesPublished902 A.2d 127 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 6, 2006
Lexis 210, at *9 (citing United States v. Watson, 697 A.2d 36, 38 (D.C.1997)) (quoting Holt v. United States, 675 A.2d 474, 478 (D.C.1996) (internal quotation marks omitted)); see also Peay v. … Id. at 124 , 120 S.Ct. 673 (citing Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47 , 99 S.Ct. 2637 , 61 L.Ed.2d 357 (1979)).
Cited 0 timesPublished933 A.2d 785 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 16, 2007
Brady v. … See Brown v. United States, 840 A.2d 82, 89 (D.C.2004).
Cited 21 timesPublished406 A.2d 1275 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 15, 1979
See State v. Brown, 21 Md. App. 91 , 318 A.2d 257 (Ct.Spec.App.1974) (year and a day rule, as part of the common law of England, adopted by Maryland in 1776; see also Louisville, Evansville and St. Louis R.R. v. … District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 343 A.2d 564, 567 (1975); Democratic Central Committee of the District of Columbia v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Comm'n, 158 U.S.App.
Cited 0 timesPublished491 A.2d 490 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 10, 1985
United States v. … Because you're wearing a brown jacket. Q. Okay. If I were to say that I'm wearing a tan shirt, would that be a lie or would that be the truth? A. The truth. Q. And why? A. Because you're wearing a tan shirt.
Cited 0 timesPublished649 A.2d 569 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 7, 1994
See Gonzales v. … See State v.
Cited 16 timesPublished66 A.3d 987 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 2, 2013
.”); Peltier v. … Donohoe v.
Cited 19 timesPublished947 A.2d 1181 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 15, 2008
Harris v. United States, 834 A.2d 106 , 115— 16 (D.C.2003) (quoting Johnson v. Leuthongchak, 111 A.2d 249, 250 (D.C.2001)). 7 . See Chaabi v. … Foreman v. United States, 792 A.2d 1043, 1052 (D.C.2002). 9 . Holmes v. United States, 580 A.2d 1259, 1263 (D.C.1990) (emphasis in original); see also Brown v.
Cited 94 timesPublishedLamont A. Biles v. United States
101 A.3d 1012 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 23, 2014
In Smith v. … Brown, 576 Fed.Appx. 145, 148 (4th Cir.2014) ("‘The Brady right ... exists to ... minimize the chance that an innocent person would be found guilty.’ ”).
Cited 9 timesPublished618 A.2d 169 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 30, 1992
See Braxton v. … Compare Brown v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedHutchison Bros. Excavating Co. v. District of Columbia
511 A.2d 3 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 11, 1986
See Hotel Association of Washington v. District of Columbia Minimum Wage and Industrial Safety Board, 318 A.2d 294, 305-07 (D.C.1974) (en banc); Chevy Chase Citizens Association v. … In Junghans v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedMcNeil Pharmaceutical v. Hawkins
686 A.2d 567 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 23, 1996
v. … In Mampe v.
Cited 56 timesPublished567 A.2d 36 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 28, 1989
In Kennedy v. … See In re E.R.E., 523 A.2d 998, 1000 (D.C.1987); Brown v. United States, 388 A.2d 451, 456-458 (D.C.1978).
Cited 22 timesPublishedJAMES EARL BLACKMON v. DAVID D. LEWIS
146 A.3d 1074 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 29, 2016
Wages v. … Brown v. United States, 934 A.2d 930, 943 (D.C. 2007) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Counsel‟s arguments, even if ultimately unsuccessful, were reasonable and based on the evidence in the case.
Cited 3 timesPublished625 A.2d 281 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 13, 1993
Tinker v. … See Acker v.
Cited 36 timesPublished430 A.2d 1321 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 8, 1981
Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 305 , 82 S.Ct. 1502, 1512 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962). … In Nebraska Press Assoc. v.
Cited 163 timesPublishedBaltimore v. District of Columbia
10 A.3d 1141 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 6, 2011
See Sears v. Catholic Archdiocese of Washington, 5 A.3d 653, 657 (D.C.2010); Andrade-Sorto v. Allstate Ins. … Id. at 36 (citing Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 569 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972)) (other citations and internal quotation marks omitted).
Cited 41 timesPublishedKirby Vining v. Executive Bd. of the DC Health Benefit Exchange Auth.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 7, 2017
EXECUTIVE BOARD OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HEALTH BENEFIT EXCHANGE AUTHORITY, ET AL., APPELLEES. … Miller v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedScholtz Partnership v. District of Columbia Rental Accommodations Commission
427 A.2d 905 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 20, 1981
Bradley v. Richmond School Board, 416 U.S. 696, 711 , 94 S.Ct. 2006, 2016 , 40 L.Ed.2d 476 (1974). … See Fleming v.
Cited 21 timesPublishedPotomac Place Assoc., LLC v. Mendez
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 10, 2025
Code § 42-3505.01; see also Suggs v. … Odeniran v.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna