Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersdc

7,092 results

1.66s

  • Anthony Hooks v. United States

    208 A.3d 741 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 30, 2019

    This court’s decision in United States v. Barnes, 496 A.2d 1040 (D.C. 1985), in particular does not compel a different conclusion. In Barnes, an 15 Brown v. … Wong Sun v.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Wolfe v. Fine

    618 A.2d 165 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 30, 1992

    See Braxton v. … Compare Brown v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • DC DCRA v. A&A

    District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 16, 2020

    Utility Air Regulatory Grp. v. EPA, 573 U.S. 302, 320 (2014) (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 133 (2000)). … See, e.g., 1303 Clifton St., LLC v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sandoe v. Lefta Associates

    551 A.2d 76 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 5, 1988

    See Brown v. … Brock, 144 Ga.App. 346, 347-50 , 241 S.E.2d 279, 281-82 (1977); Brown v. Racquet Club of Bricktown, supra, 95 N.J. at 290 , 471 A.2d at 30 (quoting Restatement (Second) of Torts § 343 comment (b), at 216); Meyer v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Arnold v. United States

    511 A.2d 399 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 18, 1986

    The robbers took $40 from Stein and also took Wyrick’s pocketbook, which contained, among other things, a brown cloth pouch and two pairs of earrings. At one point Stein was hit over the head by one of the robbers. … He had no weapons, little money, and no proceeds from the second robbery, but he did have in his possession the brown pouch and two pairs of earrings which had been taken from Carol Wyrick an hour earlier.

    Cited 57 timesPublished
  • In Re DL

    904 A.2d 367 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 3, 2006

    See, e.g., Brown v. … See Sumpter v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Colbert v. Georgetown University

    641 A.2d 469 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 5, 1994

    But see Silverman v. … DeBoer v. Brown, 138 Ariz. 168, 170, 673 P.2d 912, 914 (1983) (citations omitted).

    Cited 133 timesPublished
  • Stuart v. American Security Bank

    494 A.2d 1333 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 3, 1985

    Co. v. Decatur, 147 U.S. 190, 197-200 , 13 S.Ct. 293, 294 , 37 L.Ed. 132 (1893); Board of Directors of Red River Levee Dist. No. 1 v. Reconstruction Fin. Corp., 170 F.2d 430, 433 (8th Cir.1948); Evans v. … In District of Columbia v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Smith v. United States

    529 A.2d 312 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 10, 1987

    In Edwards v. … There was no physical abuse, see Brown v. Mississippi, 297 U.S. 278 , 56 S.Ct. 461 , 80 L.Ed. 682 (1936); incommunicado detention, Davis v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Rocha-Guzmán v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

    170 A.3d 170 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 28, 2017

    Metro Area Transit Auth. v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Emp’t Servs., 992 A.2d 1276, 1282 (D.C. 2010) (“WMATA II”); Golding-Alleyne v. … Mary’s Honor Ctr. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bethea v. United States

    365 A.2d 64 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 27, 1976

    See United States v. Brown, 155 U.S.App.D.C. 402, 407 , 478 F.2d 606, 611 (1973); Overholser v. … Brown v. Fauntleroy, 143 U.S.App.D.C. 116 , 442 F.2d 838 (1971).

    Cited 102 timesPublished
  • Collins v. United States

    596 A.2d 489 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 9, 1991

    See, e.g., Brown v. … Citing Barry v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Williams v. United States

    884 A.2d 587 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 13, 2005

    In Zafiro v. … v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Metropolitan Railroad v. MacFarland

    20 App. D.C. 421 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 15, 1902

    Northern Pacific Railroad v. Dustin, 142 U. S. 492 ; Union Pacific Railroad v. Hall, 91 U. S. 343 ; New Orleans, Etc., Railway Co. v. Mississippi, 112 U. S. 12 . 2. … People v. Lawrence, 36 Barb. 177 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Williams Ex Rel. Williams v. Vel Rey Properties, Inc.

    699 A.2d 416 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 11, 1997

    See Wagoner v. … See Williams v. Board of Trustees of Mt. Jezreel Baptist Church, 589 A.2d 901, 907 (D.C.1991); Blyther, supra, 661 A.2d at 662 . See also Langevine, supra, 323 U.S.App.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Vance v. United States

    399 A.2d 52 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 27, 1979

    United States v. Palmer, D.C. App., 393 A.2d 143 (1978); Gale v. United States, D.C.App., 391 A.2d 230 (1978). See United States v. … See United States v. Mauro, supra; United States v. Cogdell, supra.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Groves v. United States

    564 A.2d 372 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 19, 1989

    Brown v. … Drew v.

    Modified on other grounds by Groves v. United States, 1990 D.C. App. LEXIS 137 (1990)Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Spock v. District of Columbia

    283 A.2d 14 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 20, 1971

    Irani v. District of Columbia, supra. Although Menard v. … D.C.Code 1967, § 4 — 137 provides: “All records of the Metropolitan Police force shall be preserved, except that the Board of Commissioners, upon recommendation of the major and superintendent of police, may cause records

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Prince v. Firman

    584 A.2d 8 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 11, 1990

    However, as in Thatcher v. … Found., Inc. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Prophet v. United States

    602 A.2d 1087 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 31, 1992

    See Brown v. United States, 590 A.2d 1008, 1020 (D.C.1991) (de novo review of probable cause determination, giving deference to trial court’s factual findings) (quoting United States v. … V.

    Cited 32 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.