Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
7,092 results
2.48s
616 A.2d 843 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 10, 1992
Carr v. … See Brown v. United States, 567 A.2d 426 (D.C.1989) (prior leave of court is required where D.C.Code § 14-307 applies). 26 . Defense counsel did not request a continuance of the trial. 27 .
Cited 5 timesPublishedFRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE, METROPOLITAN POLICE LABOR COMMITTEE v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
139 A.3d 853 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 26, 2016
Tuohey ―is a private attorney who has worked for the District Council‖; and that both men ―used to sit on the Board‖ of the D.C. … Dep’t of Justice v.
Cited 0 timesPublished667 A.2d 1371 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 18, 1995
See, e.g., Schwartz v. Brown, 64 A.2d 298, 299 (D.C.1949). … See Curry v. Dunbar House, Inc., 362 A.2d 686, 689 (D.C.1976); Javins v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedEric D. Foreman v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 30, 2015
v. … See Lester v. United States, 25 A.3d 867, 872 (D.C. 2011) (quoting Morris v.
Cited 0 timesPublished77 A.3d 971 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 7, 2013
Smith v. … See Brown v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedFort Chaplin Park Associates v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission
649 A.2d 1076 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 10, 1994
See also Saak v. … These items were blinds, vanities, microwaves, dishwashers, garbage disposals, mirrors, and cutting boards. 9 .
Cited 6 timesPublished779 A.2d 348 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 23, 2001
United States v. Heller, 625 F.2d 594, 599 (5th Cir.1980). That exception is not at issue here. United States v. Nagelberg, 434 F.2d 585 , 587 n. 1 (2d Cir.1970). … Brown v. United States, 619 A.2d 1180, 1182 (D.C.1992). The defender is “entitled to use the degree of force reasonably necessary to protect the other person.... ” Fersner v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedEstate of Presgrave v. Stephens
529 A.2d 274 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 27, 1987
United States v. … See Martin v. Brown, 410 A.2d 205, 209 (D.C. 1979); D.C.Code § 17-305.
Cited 9 timesPublished853 A.2d 132 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 3, 2004
See, e.g., Frazier v. Underdue-Frazier, 803 A.2d 443, 444 (D.C.2002) (per curiam).' Notably, in Singer v. … Brown, Caroff, Cornish, and Fischer. All of them testified that NMS directly and adversely affects a victim’s ability to consciously perceive his or her surroundings, including discomfort and pain.
Cited 15 timesPublishedSmith v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
548 A.2d 95 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 29, 1988
Grillo v. … Co. v. Ferguson, 340 So.2d 920, 921 (Fla.1976); Miller v. Western Elec. Co., 310 Md. 173, 186 , 528 A.2d 486, 493 (1987); Corson v. Brown Products, Inc., 120 N.H. 665, 668 , 421 A.2d 1005, 1008 (1980); Fortuna v.
Cited 78 timesPublished554 A.2d 332 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 17, 1989
E.g., United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220 , 80 S.Ct. 282 , 4 L.Ed.2d 259 (1960); Howard University v. Pobbi-Asamani, 488 A.2d 1350, 1353 (D.C.1985); Brown v. United States, 379 A.2d 708 (D.C.1977). … Hertz v. Klavan, 374 A.2d 871, 873 (D.C. 1977); accord, Gray v. Gray, 412 A.2d 1208, 1210 (D.C.1980); Osin v. Johnson, 100 U.S.App.D.C. 230, 233 , 243 F.2d 653, 656 (1957).
Cited 22 timesPublished739 A.2d 353 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 28, 1999
See Brown v. United States, 590 A.2d 1008, 1019 (D.C.1991) (citing In re D.J., 532 A.2d 138, 141 (D.C.1982)). … See Wisconsin v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedGreyvan Lines, Inc. v. Nesmith
50 A.2d 434 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 12, 1946
Bank v. Maiatico, 61 App.D.C. 242 , 60 F.2d 1078, 1079 . See also Culver v. Nichols, 140 Md. 448 , 117 A. 873 ; Merritt v. Bissell, 155 N.Y. 396 , 50 N.E. 280 . Culver v. Nichols, supra; Harriss v. … Tams, 258 N.Y. 229 , 179 N.E. 476 ; Wade v. Wolfson, Sup., 90 N.Y.S. 1078 . Board of Sup'rs of Marshall County v. Schenck, 72 U.S. 772, 782 , 18 L.Ed. 556 . District Nat. Bank v. Maiatico, supra. Birmingham News Co. v.
Cited 12 timesPublishedDEANGELO JENKINS v. UNITED STATES
152 A.3d 585 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 2, 2017
According to Officer Polanco, the complaining witness described the person who brandished the weapon as a 21- to 22-year-old, 5’8” to 5’9” tall, dark-brown-complected black male of average build, with dreadlocks hairstyle … United States v. Lima, 424 A.2d 113, 118 (D.C. 1986 (en banc); see also Limpuangthip v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNational Organization for Women v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance
531 A.2d 274 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 18, 1987
See Seidina, S.P.R.L. v. Imrex Co., 473 U.S. 479, 490 , 105 S.Ct. 3275, 3282 , 87 L.Ed.2d 346 (1985); cf. State v. … See West v.
Cited 12 timesPublished36 A.2d 720 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 3, 1944
In Hyman v. … Barrett, 224 N.Y. 436 , 121 N.E. 271, 272 , where repairs to a tenement were in progress and a tenant crossing the courtyard was injured by a board or shelf which fell from the hands of one of the workmen, it was held that
Cited 0 timesPublished44 A.3d 948 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 31, 2012
.”); Ware v. United States, 672 A.2d 557, 568 (D.C.1996) (“[T]he fact that the tip was given in person, rather than over the telephone, further strengthens its credibility.”); Brown v. … Palos-Marquez, 591 F.3d 1272, 1275 (9th Cir. 2010); United States v. Heard, 367 F.3d 1275, 1279 (11th Cir.2004); United States v. Thompson, 234 F.3d 725, 729 (D.C.Cir. 2000); United States v.
Cited 2 timesPublished75 A.3d 113 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 22, 2013
Brown v. United States, 627 A.2d 499, 508 (D.C.1998). Here, appellant affirmatively acquiesced to the introduction of the evidence about which he now complains. … Williamson v. United States, 445 A.2d 975, 981 (D.C.1982); 7 see also Alberty v.
Cited 3 timesPublished73 A.3d 964 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 1, 2013
.”); Williams v. … Nonetheless, we note that a number of Virginia circuit courts have ruled that the Virginia Condominium Act bars liability against anyone other than the developer or the condominium board. See, e.g., Watson v.
Cited 7 timesPublished622 A.2d 67 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 26, 1993
Chavez v. United States, 499 A.2d 813, 814 (D.C.1985). III. Appellant relies on Green v. … Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 569-72 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2705-06 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972).
Cited 6 timesPublished
Ask Donna