Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
7,092 results
2.54s
Parreco v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission
567 A.2d 43 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 28, 1989
W. v. … United States v. Brown, 333 U.S. 18, 27 , 68 S.Ct. 376, 380 , 92 L.Ed. 442 (1948); Holt v. United States, 565 A.2d 970, 972 (D.C.1989) (en banc). Moreover, as the Supreme Court stated in Perry v.
Cited 115 timesPublished833 A.2d 481 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 9, 2003
Herbin v. United States, 683 A.2d 437, 441 (D.C.1996), citing Godfrey v. … “Our decision in United States v.
Cited 17 timesPublished878 A.2d 1212 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 14, 2005
[contacted District of Columbia Board of Medicine, [and] made false statements regarding Petitioner’s sex life and the intentional spread of sexually transmitted, diseases by Petitioner; 3. … McBryde v. Amoco Oil Co., 404 A.2d 200, 202 (D.C.1979).
Cited 16 timesPublished28 App. D.C. 423 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 4, 1906
Dodge v. Fowler, 11 App. D. C. 592; Fowler v. Dodge, 14 App. D. C. 411. … Cain v. Park, 14 App. D. C. 42, 46.
Cited 2 timesPublished3 A.3d 356 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 2, 2010
Barnes v. … See generally Brown v. United States, 818 A.2d 179, 185 (D.C.2003). 17 . Cf.
Cited 11 timesPublishedFarina v. Janet Keenan Housing Corporation
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 22, 2025
Juul v. … Hooker v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedJoeckel v. Disabled American Veterans
793 A.2d 1279 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 21, 2002
Prewitt v. … Rymer v.
Cited 50 timesPublished841 A.2d 776 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 5, 2004
Tirgan, as a physician board-certified in internal medicine and oncology, would have been qualified as an expert in Dr. Fleury’s field of pathology. Berkow argues, nonetheless, that under Abbey v. … See Hardi v. Mezzanotte, 818 A.2d 974, 979 (D.C.2003).
Cited 10 timesPublished537 A.2d 211 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 18, 1988
In District of Columbia v. … District of Columbia Board of Elections and Ethics, 441 A.2d 889 (D.C.1981) (en banc); District of Columbia v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedHoward University v. Roberts-Williams
37 A.3d 896 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 23, 2012
Howard Univ., 890 A.2d 194, 202 (D.C.2006) (quoting Brown v. George Washington Univ., 802 A.2d 382, 385 (D.C.2002)). … Brown, supra, 802 A.2d at 386 (internal quotation marks omitted).
Cited 5 timesPublished580 A.2d 653 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 21, 1990
Id. at 1097 ; accord, Jones v. … Accord, Brown v. United States, 542 A.2d 1231, 1234 (D.C.1988).
Cited 18 timesPublished531 A.2d 661 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 30, 1987
Meaders v. United States, 519 A.2d 1248, 1255 (D.C.1986); In re D.M.C., 503 A.2d 1280, 1282-83 (D.C.1986). … Smith v. United States, 318 A.2d 891, 893 (D.C.1974); Brown v. United States, 126 U.S.App.D.C. 134 , 142, 375 F.2d 310, 318 (1966), cert. denied, 388 U.S. 915 , 87 S.Ct. 2133 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1359 (1967); Smith v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedLoftus v. District of Columbia
51 A.3d 1285 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 13, 2012
Santos v. … See State v.
Cited 4 timesPublished972 A.2d 821 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 4, 2009
Joseph v. United States, 926 A.2d 1156, 1160 (D.C.2007) (citations omitted). The court’s “ultimate conclusion[s]” on Fourth Amendment issues, however, are “subject to de novo review.” Brown v. … Botts v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedHard Rock Café v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
911 A.2d 1217 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 22, 2006
Dorsey v. ITT/Continental Baking, Dir. Dkt. No. 86-19, 1989 DC Wrk. Comp. Lexis 161 (May 9, 1989), at 2-3. 4 In Orius Telecomms., Inc. v. … See also, for example, Malone v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedUnited States ex rel. International Contracting Co. v. Lamont
2 App. D.C. 532 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 5, 1894
For, as said by the Supreme Court, in the case of Board of Liquidation v. McComb, 92 U. … Clark v. United States, 95 U. S., 539 ; South Boston Iron Co. v. United States, 118 U. S., 37, 42 .
Cited 0 timesPublished662 A.2d 837 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 30, 1995
Brown v. United States, 66 A.2d 491, 493 (D.C.1949). … United States v. Brown, 333 U.S. 18, 25-26 , 68 S.Ct. 376, 380 , 92 L.Ed. 442 (1948) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted).
Cited 19 timesPublished28 A.3d 1138 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 29, 2011
Weaver v. … Young & Simon, Inc. v.
Cited 3 timesPublished947 A.2d 47 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 18, 2008
(quoting Hunter v. United States, 48 App. D.C. 19, 23 (1918)). 9 . D.C.Code § 16-1001(5) (1994 Supp.) (emphasis added). 10 . McKnight v. Scott, 665 A.2d 973, 975 (D.C.1995). 11 . Sandoval v. … See Ba v. United States, 809 A.2d 1178 , 1182 n. 6, 1183 (D.C.2002); Mabry v. Demery, 707 A.2d 49, 51 (D.C.1998).
Cited 17 timesPublished694 A.2d 860 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 1, 1997
See Little v. United States, 665 A.2d 977, 980 (D.C.1995). Rather, we have repeatedly invoked the principle set forth in Miller v. … Peay v. United States, 597 A.2d 1318, 1320 (D.C.1991) (en *865 banc) (citation omitted). Moreover, "[w]e must accept the trial judge's findings of evidentiary fact and his resolution of conflicting testimony." Brown v.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna