Case law

Stephenson v. American Dental Ass'n

789 A.2d 1248 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 17, 2002

In Ricks , plaintiff, a college professor, received notice on June 26, 1974, from the President and Board of Trustees of the defendant college denying him tenure. … In Walch v.

Jessica Velcoff, Ph.D. v. MedStar Health

186 A.3d 823 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 21, 2018

Robins v. … Nor, as far as we can tell, has the Compensation Review Board, the “expert[]” administrative body “responsibl[e] for administering the Workers‟ Compensation Act.” Howard Univ. Hosp. v.

Thompson v. United States

45 A.3d 688 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 14, 2012

See Hayes v. … In Scipio v.

Taylor v. United States

661 A.2d 636 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 22, 1995

Brown, 644 F.2d 101 (2d Cir.1981) (on government motion, court ordered defendant to state in the presence of the jury words allegedly uttered by the bank robber so that witnesses could make in court identification). … See Ibn-Tamas v. United States, 455 A.2d 893 (D.C.1983). In Middleton v.

Bethard v. District of Columbia

650 A.2d 651 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 10, 1994

Compare, e.g., Irby v. … Super.Ct.Crim.R. 42(a) (1994). 10 However, this power is “reserved for ‘exceptional circumstances,’ ” Harris v. United States, 382 U.S. 162, 164 , 86 S.Ct. 352, 354 , 15 L.Ed.2d 240 (1965) (quoting Brown v.

Epperson v. United States

495 A.2d 1170 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 24, 1985

Compare Nelson v. … See United States v. Hamann, 688 F.2d 507 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1013 , 103 S.Ct. 1255 , 75 L.Ed.2d 483 (1983); United States v. Brown, 634 F.2d 1069 (7th Cir.1980); United States v.

Rose v. United States

49 A.3d 1252 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 16, 2012

Anderson v. … Brown, 20 N.C.App. 71 , 200 S.E.2d 666, 667 (1973) (“[U]nlawful possession cannot be considered a lesser included offense of the crime of unlawful distribution.”).

Frausto v. United States Department of Commerce

926 A.2d 151 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 14, 2007

See King v. … See, e.g., Brown v.

Jaffe v. Nocera

493 A.2d 1003 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 6, 1985

Co. v. … Co. v.

Jones v. United States

972 A.2d 821 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 4, 2009

Joseph v. United States, 926 A.2d 1156, 1160 (D.C.2007) (citations omitted). The court’s “ultimate conclusion[s]” on Fourth Amendment issues, however, are “subject to de novo review.” Brown v. … Botts v.

Joeckel v. Disabled American Veterans

793 A.2d 1279 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 21, 2002

Prewitt v. … Rymer v.

Atchison v. United States

982 A.2d 1138 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 29, 2009

See Poole v. United States, 630 A.2d 1109, 1116 (D.C.1993) (quoting United States v. Bustamante-Gamez, 488 F.2d 4, 9 (9th Cir.1973)). … We are well aware that the Supreme Court in Hudson v.

Kim E. Smith v. United States

111 A.3d 1 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 4, 2014

See Brown v. … See Leon, supra, at 920–22; United States v.

Tinsley v. United States

868 A.2d 867 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 24, 2005

See Johnson v. … Brown v. United States, 726 A.2d 149, 154 (D.C.1999).

Ayers v. Landow

666 A.2d 51 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 2, 1995

See, e.g., Jensen v. … of the board); Reifke v.

Chase Manhattan Bank v. Burden

489 A.2d 494 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 27, 1985

Commissioner, 292 F.2d 478 (3d Cir.1961), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 967 , 82 S.Ct. 438 , 7 L.Ed.2d 395 (1962) (shareholder becomes a creditor of the corporation when the board of directors, exercising its discretionary power … Penney Co. v.

Key v. Doyle

365 A.2d 621 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 1, 1976

Nov. 13, 1928) (Board of Relief of the Presbyterian Church); In re Estate of Murray, supra (Little Sisters of the Poor). 4 Thus, in a series of cases involving § 18-302 and its predecessor sections, lega *623 cies allegedly … Bolling v. Sharpe, 347 U.S. 497, 499 , 74 S.Ct. 693 , 98 L.Ed. 884 (1954). See also Jimenez v.

Kovach v. District of Columbia

805 A.2d 957 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 29, 2002

An appeal from an adverse decision by the examiner may be made to an Appeals Board, see D.C.Code § 50-2304.02, and ultimately to the Superior Court, see D.C.Code § 50-2304.05. … Ringgold v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Employment Servs., 531 A.2d 241 , 243 n. 3 (D.C.1987) (citing Montana v.

Payne v. United States

697 A.2d 1229 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 24, 1997

Berry v. … Id. at 444 ; see also Brown v. United States, 327 A.2d 539, 542 (D.C.1974). Nothing in the record on appeal supports Payne’s contention of suggestivity in the identification.

In re Wickers

29 App. D.C. 71 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 5, 1907

These interferences are Wickers v. Weinwurm, No. 23,741; Wickers v. McKee, No. 22,404 (No. 388 Patent Appeal Docket) [ante, 25]; and Wickers v. … He fully sustained the Examiner and Board of Examiners-in-Cliief, holding that the separate matters in all the claims brought up on appeal were in *78 volved in the issues in interference before mentioned.