Case law

McCamey v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

886 A.2d 543 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 10, 2005

United Parcel Serv. v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Employment Servs., 834 A.2d 868, 871 (D.C.2003) (citations omitted); see generally Chevron, USA v. Natural Res. Def. … We note that the very recent decision of the District of Columbia Compensation Board in West v. Washington Hosp. Ctr., CRB (Dir.Dkt.)

Thomas v. United States

171 A.3d 151 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 12, 2017

See United States v. … See generally United States v. Pforzheimer, 826 F.2d 200, 204 (2d Cir. 1987); United States v. Shaffer, 520 F.2d 1369, 1372 (3d Cir. 1975).

United States v. Engram

337 A.2d 488 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 14, 1975

Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of the State of New Mexico, 353 U.S. 232, 241 , 77 S.Ct. 752 , 1 L.Ed.2d 796 (1957); United States v. Maynard, 155 U.S.App.D.C. 223 , 476 F.2d 1170 (1973); Simms v. … See also United States v. Ryan, supra.

Capitol Hill Restoration Society v. Zoning Commission

287 A.2d 101 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 7, 1972

DiMatteo, 10 Mich.App. 129 , 135—136, 157 N.W.2d 1, 5 (1968) (variance granted by Board of Zoning Appeals). See also Allen v. Zoning Commission, D.C. Cir., 449 F.2d 1100 n.3 (1971) (dicta). … In McKart v.

Banks v. Hoffman

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 13, 2025

See Bergman v. … See Navellier v. Sletten, 52 P.3d 703, 714 (Cal. 2002) (Brown, J., dissenting) (“The cure has become the disease—SLAPP motions are now just the latest form of abusive litigation.”).

American Studies Association v. Bronner

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 30, 2021

Inst. v. … Co. v.

Perry v. Virginia Mortg. and Inv. Co., Inc.

412 A.2d 1194 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 19, 1980

Compare Earll v. … v.

Richardson v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance

826 A.2d 310 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 12, 2003

Co. v. … Co. v.

District of Columbia v. Cooper

483 A.2d 317 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 24, 1984

See Smith v. United States, 392 A.2d 990, 991-993 (D.C.1978); Brown v. United States, 119 U.S.App.D.C. 203, 205-208 , 338 F.2d 543, 545-548 (1964). But other interests may require the veil of secrecy to be lifted. … For example, in Davis v.

Carter-Lanhardt, Inc. v. District of Columbia

413 A.2d 916 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 9, 1980

The court, in relying upon both legislative history and certain language contained in this court’s opinion in National Graduate University v. … Finally, we are of opinion that this court’s decision in National Graduate University v.

Apartment House Council of Metropolitan Washington, Inc. v. Public Service Commission

332 A.2d 53 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 6, 1975

Findings of fact are conclusive unless they are “unreasonable, arbitrary, or capricious.” 12 Goodman v. Public Service Commission, D.C.App., 309 A.2d 97 , 100 (1973); Goodman v. … Civil Aeronautics Board, 495 F.2d 145, 152 (D. C. Cir. 1974). See also Permian Basin Area Rate Cases, 390 U.S. 747, 767 , 88 S.Ct. 1344 , 20 L.Ed.2d 312 (1968); Watergate Improvement Associates v.

Murray v. United States

358 A.2d 314 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 24, 1976

[Neal v. … See, e. g., State v. Prudhomme, 228 N.W.2d 243 (Minn.1975) ; Brown v. State, 129 Ga.App. 743 , 201 S.E.2d 14 (1973); State v. Miranda, 3 Ariz.App. 550 , 416 P.2d 444 (1966) ; State v.

Mims v. Mims

635 A.2d 320 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 9, 1993

In M.A.P. v. … See Brown v. Dyer, 489 A.2d 1081, 1083 (D.C.1985). . There is an interesting, complex question whether the D.C.

Giant Food v. DC DEPT. OF EMPLOYMENT SERVS.

934 A.2d 921 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 11, 2007

See, e.g., Fernandez-Vargas v. … Lloyd v. Giant Foods, Inc., Dir. Dkt.

Mark Keshishian & Sons, Inc. v. Washington Square, Inc.

414 A.2d 834 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 24, 1980

[and] merge with and assume the character of a willful tort”) (citing Brown v. Coates, 102 U.S.App.D.C. 300 , 303, 253 F.2d 36, 39 , 67 A.L.R.2d 943 (1958)). … Kresge v. Crowley, 47 App.D.C. 13, 16 (1917) (citing Purcell v. Miner (Purcell v.

DCX, Inc. v. District of Columbia Taxicab Commission

705 A.2d 1096 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 22, 1998

Smith v. Police and Firemen’s Retirement and Relief Board, 460 A.2d 997, 999 (D.C.1983). II. … See Farahpour v. DCX, Inc., No. 92-CV-505 (D.C. Nov. 2, 1994).

Sartori v. Society of American Military Engineers

499 A.2d 883 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 24, 1985

Brown, 395 A.2d 50, 52-53 (D.C.1979), which was committed to the second motions judge. 9 The record before the second motions judge differed significantly from that before the first judge, and no hearing was held on the motion … In Washington v.

Stover v. District of Columbia

32 A.2d 536 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 29, 1942

In United States v. … Co. v. Hammond, 109 Ga. 383, 389 , 34 S.E. 594 ; Hilton v. Southwick, 17 Me. 303 , 35 Am.Dec. 253; Vollrath v. Crowe, 9 Wash. 374 , 37 P. 474 ; Ford v. Holmes, 61 Ga. 419 ; Louisville & N. R. Co. v.

In Re Manville

538 A.2d 1128 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 4, 1988

See, e.g., Cleveland Board of Education v. … See City of Cleburne v.

Tuten v. United States

440 A.2d 1008 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 10, 1982

Doe v. … See Temporaries Inc. v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, D.C.App., 304 A.2d 14, 17 (1973).