Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
7,092 results
1.62s
Barber v. District of Columbia Department of Human Resources
361 A.2d 194 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 3, 1976
Smith v. Worksman, D.C.Mun.App., 99 A.2d 712 (1953); McChesney v. Moore, D.C.Mun.App., 78 A.2d 389, 390 (1951). Such, under the facts, is the case presented here. … Udall v. Tallman, 380 U.S. 1, 16-17 , 85 S.Ct. 792 , 13 L.Ed.2d 616 (1965); Taylor v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 308 A.2d 230, 232, 233-34 (1973); Hobson v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedDon't Tear It Down, Inc. v. District of Columbia
395 A.2d 388 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 6, 1978
District Unemployment Compensation Board v. Security Storage Co., D.C.App., 365 A.2d 785, 787 (1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 939 , 97 S.Ct. 2651 , 53 L.Ed.2d 256 (1977). See Delaware & Hudson Railway v. … Although findings are not required when there is no factual dispute, First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. Camp, supra, at 484; Urbain v.
Cited 20 timesPublished364 A.2d 1205 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 5, 1976
Kotch v. Board of River Port Pilot Comm'rs, 330 U.S. 552, 556 , 67 S.Ct. 910 , 91 L.Ed. 1093 (1947); Tigner v. Texas, 310 U.S. 141, 147 , 60 S.Ct. 879 , 84 L.Ed. 1124 (1940). … Bolling v. Sharpe, 347 U.S. 497 , 74 S.Ct. 693 , 98 L.Ed. 884 (1954); Washington v.
Cited 5 timesPublished482 A.2d 1243 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 24, 1984
James immediately reported the robbery to the police and described the assailant as an 18 or 19 year old black male, of medium build, with a light brown complexion, carrying a shotgun, wearing a beige hat, dark sunglasses … Relying on Manson v.
Cited 2 timesPublished2 App. D.C. 156 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 2, 1894
. & J., 333 ; Baltimore v. Chase, 2 G. & J., 381 ; David v. Grahame, 2 H. & G., 94 ; Carey v. Dennis, 13 Md., 1; Piper v. Tuck, 26 Md., 208 ; Lynn v. Gephart, 27 Md., 547 ; McDowell v. … Says the Supreme Court of the United States in the case of Brown v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedFort Myer Constr. Co. v. Briscoe
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 3, 2023
Dep’t of Mental Health v. Hayes, 6 A.3d 255, 259 (D.C. 2010) (holding that employee’s conviction for possession of controlled substance constituted gross misconduct)); Brown v. … Lynch v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 19, 2020
Battocchi v. Washington Hosp. … See Koonce v.
Cited 0 timesPublished419 A.2d 993 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 4, 1980
Woodard v. City Stores Company, D.C.App., 334 A.2d 189, 192 (1975). … Mayberry v.
Cited 11 timesPublished512 A.2d 1002 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 28, 1986
In Gillis v. … Browning, 28 N.C.App. 376 , 221 S.E.2d 375 (1976); People v. Lenkevich, 394 Mich. 117 , 229 N.W.2d 298 (1975); State v. Grantham, 224 S.C. 41 , 77 S.E.2d 291 (1953); State v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedYaw v. District of Columbia Taxicab Commission
591 A.2d 227 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 24, 1991
See Gebremariam v. District of Columbia Hackers’ License Appeal Bd., 533 A.2d 909 , 910 n. 2 (D.C.1987) (Board’s decision must be affirmed on appeal if it is supported by substantial evidence); see also Jones v. … District of Columbia Hackers’ License Appeal Bd., 455 A.2d 896, 897 (D.C.1983); Pillis v.
Cited 0 timesPublished122 A.3d 903 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 13, 2015
See Jackson v. … See Nixon v.
Cited 12 timesPublished353 A.2d 686 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 9, 1976
See United States v. … Wright v. United States, 315 A.2d 839 at 842, n. 7 (D.C.App.1974). See also Roberson v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedRenard v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
673 A.2d 1274 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 28, 1996
See Mannan v. Board of Medicine, 558 A.2d 329, 338 (D.C.1989) (citing 21 C. WRIGHT & K. GRAHAM, FEDERAL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE § 5106, at 595 (1977)). … S.S. v. D.M., 597 A.2d 870 , 880 (D.C.1991) (citations omitted); 2 John W. STRONG, McCoRmick on Evidence § 330, at 396 (4th ed. 1992); see also Mack v.
Cited 12 timesPublished413 A.2d 154 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 28, 1980
United States v. Firestone Tire and Rubber Co., *158 455 F.Supp. 1072 (D.D.C.1978). … See e. g., Dorszynski v. United States, 418 U.S. 424, 440-41 , 94 S.Ct. 3042, 3051 , 41 L.Ed.2d 855 (1974); Foster v. United States, D.C.App., 290 A.2d 176, 178-79 (1972).
Cited 19 timesPublishedBaltimore & Potomac Railroad v. Carrington
3 D.C. App. 101 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 2, 1894
Casey v. R. R. Co., 78 N. Y., 518 ; Ernst v. R. R. Co., 39 N. Y., 61 ; McGrath v. R. R. Co., 63 N. Y., 522 ; R. R. Co. v. Yundt, 78 Ind., 373 ; R. R. Co. v. State, use of Hauer, 60 Md., 449 ; Dolan v. Canal Co., 71 N. … In Warner v. R. R.
Cited 0 timesPublished809 A.2d 584 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 31, 2002
Brown, Proctor and Rowley all recognized Mr. Brooks from his jacket and voice. Mr. … The government’s position is consistent with what we reiterated in Brown v. United States, 474 A.2d 161 (D.C.1984): In Morris v.
Cited 40 timesPublishedPro-Football, Inc. v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
588 A.2d 275 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 28, 1991
The Director analyzed the issue in terms of the three-part test established in Hughes v. WMATA, H & AS No. 83-60 (March 6, 1980), aff'd, Hughes v. … Ill In the present case, as in Bender v.
Cited 10 timesPublished656 A.2d 1123 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 23, 1995
In Kent v. … Hopkins v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSledd v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
439 A.2d 464 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 9, 1981
When a Metro train pulled into the station, appellant placed his equipment inside the train and then boarded it before all of the passengers had exited. … Nader v. de Toledano, supra at 42.
Cited 12 timesPublishedDONNA MARSDEN v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.
142 A.3d 525 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 14, 2016
Marsden disability compensation, the District appealed to the Compensation Review Board (CRB). Id. While the appeal was pending, the District sent payments to Ms. Marsden in compliance with the ALJ’s decision. … See, e.g., Stackhouse v.
Cited 11 timesPublished
Ask Donna