Case law

LEJUNE C. SMITH v. UNITED STATES

141 A.3d 1095 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 7, 2016

Cf., e.g., Aylward v. … See, e.g., People v.

Dorsey v. District of Columbia

917 A.2d 639 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 15, 2007

Cobb v. Standard, Drug Co., 453 A.2d 110, 111 (D.C.1982). … In addition, an aggrieved person may seek judicial review of an appeals board decision by filing an application for the allowance of an appeal in the Superior Court. D.C.Code § 50-2304.05 (2001).

Smith v. District of Columbia

436 A.2d 53 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 25, 1981

[See United States Railroad Retirement Board v. … See Pike v.

Colter v. United States

392 A.2d 994 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 11, 1978

. *997 In Morrissey v. … [Gagnon v. Scarpelli, supra at 786 , 93 S.Ct. at 1762 , quoting Morrissey v. Brewer, supra 408 U.S. at 489 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 .] Accord, Clark v.

Lee v. D.C. Department of Employment Services

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 26, 2022

On Petition for Review of an Order of the District of Columbia Department of Employment Services Compensation Review Board (CRB-20-097) (Submitted … Bentt v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Emp’t Servs., 979 A.2d 1226, 1232 (D.C. 2009) (quoting Kolson v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Emp’t Servs., 699 A.2d 357, 359 (D.C. 1997)).

Spinner v. United States

618 A.2d 176 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 30, 1992

See Brown v. United States, 590 A.2d 1008, 1020 (D.C.1991); United States v. McCarthy, 448 A.2d 267, 269 (D.C.1989). … In Nix v.

Steward v. UNITED STATES

6 A.3d 1268 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 4, 2010

In Graham v. … See Johnson, supra, 683 A.2d at 1098 ; Brown v. United States, 840 A.2d 82, 94-95 (D.C.2004).

Jacobson v. Jacobson

277 A.2d 280 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 10, 1971

As we recently said in Davis v. Davis, D.C.App., 268 A.2d 515, 517 (1970), citing Le Bert-Francis v. … In Gallon v.

In re T. L. J.

413 A.2d 154 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 28, 1980

United States v. Firestone Tire and Rubber Co., *158 455 F.Supp. 1072 (D.D.C.1978). … See e. g., Dorszynski v. United States, 418 U.S. 424, 440-41 , 94 S.Ct. 3042, 3051 , 41 L.Ed.2d 855 (1974); Foster v. United States, D.C.App., 290 A.2d 176, 178-79 (1972).

Diggs v. United States

966 A.2d 857 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 5, 2009

See, e.g., Lewis v. … Id. at 840-41 (quoting Connecticut v. Shepard, 7 Conn. 54 (1828)). See also Evans v. United States, 779 A.2d 891, 894 (D.C.2001), quoting Ray v.

Blocker v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 8, 2020

Stockard v. … United States, 930 A.2d 232, 238 (D.C. 2007). 34 Id. at 238; see also Brown v.

Cooper v. United States

512 A.2d 1002 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 28, 1986

In Gillis v. … Browning, 28 N.C.App. 376 , 221 S.E.2d 375 (1976); People v. Lenkevich, 394 Mich. 117 , 229 N.W.2d 298 (1975); State v. Grantham, 224 S.C. 41 , 77 S.E.2d 291 (1953); State v.

Sledd v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

439 A.2d 464 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 9, 1981

When a Metro train pulled into the station, appellant placed his equipment inside the train and then boarded it before all of the passengers had exited. … Nader v. de Toledano, supra at 42.

In re E.G.

482 A.2d 1243 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 24, 1984

James immediately reported the robbery to the police and described the assailant as an 18 or 19 year old black male, of medium build, with a light brown complexion, carrying a shotgun, wearing a beige hat, dark sunglasses … Relying on Manson v.

Anacostia & Potomac River Railroad v. Klein

8 App. D.C. 75 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 10, 1896

He said that he signalled the car in order to take passage; that the conductor saw him and caused the car to be brought to a stop that he might enter; that, encumbered by his sample case, he stepped upon the foot-board, took … Railroad Co. v. Tobriner, 147 U. S. 571, 580 ; Met. Railroad Co. v. Jones, 1 App. D. C. 200, 207; Booth, St. Rwy. Law, sec. 348.

Neku v. United States

620 A.2d 259 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 12, 1993

Blackwell v. … In Taylor v.

District of Columbia v. Pizzulli

917 A.2d 620 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 8, 2007

who assisted board in determining whether to release parolee); Turner v. … Moss v. Stockard, 580 A.2d 1011, 1021 (D.C.1990); cf. Johnson v.

Barber v. District of Columbia Department of Human Resources

361 A.2d 194 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 3, 1976

Smith v. Worksman, D.C.Mun.App., 99 A.2d 712 (1953); McChesney v. Moore, D.C.Mun.App., 78 A.2d 389, 390 (1951). Such, under the facts, is the case presented here. … Udall v. Tallman, 380 U.S. 1, 16-17 , 85 S.Ct. 792 , 13 L.Ed.2d 616 (1965); Taylor v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 308 A.2d 230, 232, 233-34 (1973); Hobson v.

Don't Tear It Down, Inc. v. District of Columbia

395 A.2d 388 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 6, 1978

District Unemployment Compensation Board v. Security Storage Co., D.C.App., 365 A.2d 785, 787 (1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 939 , 97 S.Ct. 2651 , 53 L.Ed.2d 256 (1977). See Delaware & Hudson Railway v. … Although findings are not required when there is no factual dispute, First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. Camp, supra, at 484; Urbain v.

Stewart v. United States

364 A.2d 1205 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 5, 1976

Kotch v. Board of River Port Pilot Comm'rs, 330 U.S. 552, 556 , 67 S.Ct. 910 , 91 L.Ed. 1093 (1947); Tigner v. Texas, 310 U.S. 141, 147 , 60 S.Ct. 879 , 84 L.Ed. 1124 (1940). … Bolling v. Sharpe, 347 U.S. 497 , 74 S.Ct. 693 , 98 L.Ed. 884 (1954); Washington v.