Case law

Bedell v. Inver Housing, Inc.

506 A.2d 202 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 18, 1986

Voulgaris v. Press, supra, 116 A.2d at 692 ; Thompson v. Deal, 67 App.D.C. 327, 333 , 92 F.2d 478, 484 (1937). … Brown v. Coates, 102 U.S.App.D.C. 300 , 303, 253 F.2d 36, 39 (1958); McIntosh v. Aetna Life Insurance Co., 268 A.2d 518, 521 (D.C.1970).

Masonic Mutual Relief Ass'n v. McAuley

13 D.C. 70 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 30, 1882

not exceed the amount the legal representatives, if any, would have been entitled to and, by another article, it is provided that “ no change of beneficiary can be made or recognized until submitted to and approved by the board … An argument is based on the language of article V, section 5, which provides that where the deceased member has no legal representative, the money shall become the property of the association.

Georgetown Univ. v. DC DEPT. OF EMP. SERVS.

985 A.2d 431 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 17, 2009

NEBEKER, Senior Judge: Georgetown University petitions for review of the Compensation Review Board (CRB)'s affirmance of an Administrative Hearings Division (AHD) order granting intervenor John Banini temporary total disability … E.g., Golding-Alleyne v. District of Columbia Dep't of Emp. Servs., 980 A.2d 1209, 1212 (D.C.2009).

Dublin v. United States

388 A.2d 461 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 2, 1978

See Lightfoot v. United States, D.C.App., 378 A.2d 670, 673 (1977); Brown v. United States, D.C.App., 349 A.2d 467, 469 (1975); United States v. … As said by the court in Womack v.

DC Dep't of Corrections v. DC Dep't of Employment Services

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 1, 2022

Wilson v. D.C. Rental Hous. Comm’n, 159 A.3d 1211, 1214 (D.C. 2017). … Ross, 125 A.3d at 702; see generally, e.g., Off. of Risk Mgmt. v.

Lucas v. United States

411 A.2d 360 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 24, 1980

In United States v. … Lopez, supra, the following signs in English and Spanish were posted at the airport boarding gates: AIRCRAFT HIJACKING IS A FEDERAL CRIME PUNISHABLE BY DEATH *366 CARRYING CONCEALED WEAPONS ABOARD AIRCRAFT IS PUNISHABLE BY

Lucas v. Auto City Parking Co.

62 A.2d 557 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 30, 1948

United States Shipping Board Emer *560 gency Fleet Corp. v. Levensaler, 53 App. D.C. 322 , 200 F. 297 , 301; Chicago, Milwaukee & St. P. R. Co. v. Lindeman, 8 Cir., 143 F. 946 ; McDevitt v. … Schulte, Inc. v. North Terminal Garage Co., supra; Rogers v. March, 253 Mass. 467 , 149 N.E. 202 ; Haddad v. Griffin, 247 Mass. 369 , 142 N.E. 74 ; Chesley v. Woods Motor Vehicle Co., 147 Ill.App. 888; Barnette v.

Hively v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

681 A.2d 1158 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 22, 1996

Smith v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Employment Servs., 548 A.2d 95, 97 (D.C.1988); MCM Parking Co. v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Employment Servs., 510 A.2d 1041, 1043-44 (D.C.1986); see also Thomas v. … United States v. Brown, 422 A.2d 1281, 1284 (D.C.1980) (citation omitted).

Stansel v. American Security Bank

547 A.2d 990 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 23, 1988

Sundown, Inc. v. Canal Square Associates, 390 A.2d 421, 430 (D.C.1978); F.W. Bolgiano & Co. v. Brown, 333 A.2d 674, 675 (D.C.1975). … See Kudon v. f.m.e. Corp., 547 A.2d 976, 980-981 (D.C.1988); Ochs v.

In Re Melton

565 A.2d 635 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 6, 1989

Douglas v. United States, 386 A.2d 289, 295 (D.C.1978); see Ibn-Tamas v. … Hartke v.

Johnson v. United States

387 A.2d 1084 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 22, 1978

[George v. … Justice Brown said: “It is no ground for reversal that the court omitted to give instructions, where they were not requested by the defendant. It is sufficient that the court gave no erroneous instructions.”

Price v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

41 A.3d 526 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 12, 2012

See Ferguson v. … Section 10(b) establishes a six-month limitations period for seeking National Labor Relations Board review of an unfair-labor-practice charge. 29 U.S.C. § 160 (b).

Fletcher v. United States

524 A.2d 40 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 16, 1987

He stated he was a black male, 20 to 21 years old, five-foot-nine to six-foot, 130 to 135 pounds, light-brown complected, short hair on his chin and he was wearing a knee-length dark-blue ski coat and armed with a handgun … Jaggers v. United States, 482 A.2d 786, 793 (D.C.1984) (defense witness); Salim v. United States, 480 A.2d 710, 715 (D.C.1984) (same).

Clark v. United States

755 A.2d 1026 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 22, 2000

See United States v. … See United States v. Brown, 737 A.2d 1016, 1018 (D.C.1999). Since the question was more "asked reflexively in a context of wonderment" than "intended to elicit inculpatory information,” Smith v.

Thomas v. United States

544 A.2d 1260 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 11, 1988

Green, supra, 355 U.S. at 191 , 78 S.Ct. at 225 (jeopardy terminated when jury discharged); Brown v. … Derrington v. United States, 488 A.2d 1314, 1335 (D.C. 1985) (citing Burrell v. United States, 455 A.2d 1373, 1380 (D.C.1983)); accord, Shivers v. United States, 533 A.2d 258, 261-63 (D.C.1987); see also Glymph v.

Wilson v. United States

995 A.2d 174 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 6, 2010

Brown v. United States, 464 A.2d 120, 124 (D.C.1983). … See Martin v. United States, 991 A.2d 791, 797 (D.C.2010) ("[Qjuestions usually cannot be characterized as intentional assertions and hence are not hearsay. But that is not invariably so.”). 11 . Brown v.

Edwards v. Safeway, Inc.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 19, 2019

Jackson, Trial Judge) (Argued May 15, 2018 Decided September 19, 2019) Moses V. Brown for appellant. Abby U. Van Grinsven, with whom Keith M. Bonner and Justin M. … Eubank v. Spencer, 128 S.E.2d 299, 301–02 (Va. 1962); see, e.g., Maurer v. Clausen Distrib.

Tamamian v. Gabbard

55 A.2d 513 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 12, 1947

V, §§ 45 — 1601 to 1611. Carroll v. Cooney, 116 Conn. 112 , 163 A. 599 ; Marden v. Radford, 229 Mo.App. 789 , 84 S.W.2d 947 . Code 1940, Supp. V, § 45 — 1611 (a). Code 1940, Supp. V, § 45 — 1611 (f). Code 1940, Supp. … V, § 45 — 1607 (b). Code 1940, Supp. V, § 45 — -1605 (b). Code 1940, § 45 — 902. Code 1940, § 45 — 903. Code 1940, § 45 — 904. Mathews v. Livingston, 86 Conn. 263 , 85 A. 529 , Ann.Cas.1914A, 195. Dewar v.

Potts v. District of Columbia

697 A.2d 1249 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 7, 1997

They brought a negligence action against the District of Columbia, George Demarest (as General Manager of the Convention Board), Spencer Promotions, Inc. … See Lechuga v. Southern Pacific Transp.

United States v. Glover

851 A.2d 473 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 10, 2004

See Whren v. … Ball v. United States, 803 A.2d 971, 975 (D.C.2002) (citing Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. 730, 741 , 103 S.Ct. 1535 , 75 L.Ed.2d 502 (1983) (plurality opinion)).