Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
7,092 results
1.67s
Providence Hospital v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services and Bonnie Poznanski
163 A.3d 115 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 6, 2017
Petitioner challenges whether the Compensation Review Board’s (“CRB”) decision was based upon substantial evidence and in accordance with the law. … Area Transit Auth. v.
Cited 0 timesPublished43 A.2d 46 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 25, 1945
It is *48 common knowledge that many servants are partially compensated by room and board, and we think the regulation did not intend that servants be counted toward the “more than four persons” occupying the house. … Southern Railway Co. v. Gray, 241 U.S. 333, 337 , 36 S.Ct. 558, 560 , 60 L.Ed. 1030 . And in jury cases, the jury should be so instructed. Smith v. United States, supra; Bedell v.
Cited 13 timesPublishedReyes v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
48 A.3d 159 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 12, 2012
Shaw v. … See Munson v.
Cited 35 timesPublished234 A.2d 801 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 14, 1967
Reliance is placed on Chambers v. … Brown v. United States, 16 F.2d 682 (1st Cir. 1926); Segurola v. United States, 16 F.2d 563 (1st Cir.1926); Schroeder v. United States, 7 F.2d 60 (2d Cir.1925); Mularkey v.
Cited 1 timesPublished760 A.2d 187 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 5, 2000
Parks v. … See, e.g., Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161, 169 , 97 S.Ct. 2221 , 53 L.Ed.2d 187 (1977); Glymph v. United States, 490 A.2d 1157, 1160-1161 (D.C. 1985); Parker v. United States, 476 A.2d 173, 176 (D.C.1984).
Cited 14 timesPublishedBarbara Brewer v. DC Office Of Employee Appeals / DC Public Schools
163 A.3d 799 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 20, 2017
In Mathis v. … Ct. at 1272 (quoting Eberhart v.
Cited 6 timesPublished602 A.2d 641 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 28, 1992
Simmons v. United States, 554 A.2d 1167, 1170 (D.C.1989); Anderson v. United States, 490 A.2d 1127, 1129 (D.C.1985); United States v. Comer, 137 U.S.App.D.C. 214, 218 , 421 F.2d 1149, 1153 (1970). … v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedFurtick v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
921 A.2d 787 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 19, 2007
Area Transit Auth. v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Employment Servs., 515 A.2d 740, 741 (D.C.1986) (citations omitted); see also Hughes v. … See also Edgerton v. Washington Metro.
Cited 2 timesPublished75 A.3d 244 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 12, 2013
Brown v. United States, 590 A.2d 1008, 1020 (D.C.1991) (citation omitted). Thus legal conclusions are reviewed de novo, but the trial court’s factual findings are left alone unless they are clearly erroneous. … Umanzor, 803 A.2d at 998-999 ; Thomas v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedDistrict of Columbia v. Pierce Associates, Inc.
462 A.2d 1129 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 16, 1983
Atlantic Richfield Co., supra, 198 Colo. at 417 , 601 P.2d at 631 (dictum) (citations omitted); accord Times Mirror Co. v. Franchise Tax Board, 102 Cal.App.3d 872 , 162 Cal.Rptr. 630 (1980). … Grace & Co. v.
Cited 22 timesPublished29 App. D.C. 519 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 7, 1907
Davis v. Wakelee, 156 U. S. 680, 689 , 39 L. ed. 578, 584, 15 Sup. Ct. Rep. 555; Dutcher v. Hill, 29 Mo. 271 , 77 Am. Dec. 572 . 2. … Brigham v. Boston & A. R. Co. 102 Mass. 14, 17 ; Heckman v. Adams, 50 Ohio St. 305 , 315, 34 N. E. 155 ; Swope v. Frazer, 18 Ky. L. Rep. 649, 37 S. W. 495 ; Oster v. Meyer, 113 Ky. 181, 186 , 67 S. W. 851 .
Cited 3 timesPublished529 A.2d 319 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 10, 1987
Washington Post Co. v. … Although the act does not limit the inherent power of a court to grant equitable relief, such as a stay, while adjudicating a FOIA case, see Renegotiation Board v.
Cited 17 timesPublished626 A.2d 878 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 3, 1993
Brown v. United States, 379 A.2d 708, 709 (D.C.1977). D.C.App.R. 4(b)(1) controls criminal appeals. 2 Williams v. United States, 412 A.2d 17, 19 (D.C.1980). … Coleman v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedWashington Chapter AIA v. DOES
594 A.2d 83 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 12, 1991
Gunty v. … Citizens Ass'n, 402 A.2d at 42 (quoting Dietrich v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, 293 A.2d 470, 473 (D.C.1972)).
Cited 0 timesPublishedMiranda v. District of Columbia, DOES
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 19, 2021
Appleseed Ctr. for L. & Just. v. … Cf., e.g., Hensley v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Emp.
Cited 0 timesPublished597 A.2d 370 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 24, 1991
Briggs v. United States, 525 A.2d 583, 594-95 (D.C.1987). … Brown v. Wright, 137 F.2d 484, 487 (4th Cir.1943). Amicus can neither take over the management of the case nor take an appeal therefrom. Givens, supra, 52 A.2d at 726 , citing Klein v. Liss, 43 A.2d 757, 758 (D.C.1945).
Cited 7 timesPublished849 A.2d 1002 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 13, 2004
Brown v. United States, 590 A.2d 1008, 1020 (D.C. 1991). … See Ybarra v.
Cited 15 timesPublished658 A.2d 205 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 15, 1995
Elliot v. Healthcare Corp., 629 A.2d 6, 9 (D.C.1993) (“As a matter of law, a report to the Unemployment Compensation Board ‘is absolutely privileged.’”) (citing Goggins v. Hoddes, 265 A.2d 302, 303 (D.C.1970)). … See also Pinto v.
Cited 11 timesPublished520 A.2d 318 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 26, 1987
Therefore, the Acting Surveyor did not refer this action to the Mayor and the Historic Preservation Review Board, and Elmore did not have to seek approval of his application or comply with the Act’s extensive procedural requirements … See, e.g., SEC v. Chenery, 332 U.S. 194 , 67 S.Ct. 1575 , 91 L.Ed. 1995 (1947); Citizens Association of Georgetown v. Washington, 291 A.2d 699 (D.C.1972).
Cited 5 timesPublishedBeatley v. District of Columbia
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 11, 2024
Affs. v. Stanford, 978 A.2d 196, 200 (D.C. 2009) (reversing the lien-removal order entered by a hearing officer of the Board of Appeals and Review, a predecessor of OAH). … Tangoren v.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna