Case law

Packheiser v. Miller

875 A.2d 645 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 2, 2005

(citing Smith v. Alder Branch Realty Ltd. P’ship, 684 A.2d 1284, 1289 (D.C.1996); In re D.R.M., 570 A.2d 796, 803 (D.C.1990); Johnson v. United States, 398 A.2d 354, 363-65 (D.C.1979)). … (citing Berryman v. United States, 378 A.2d 1317, 1320 (D.C.1977); Brown v. United States, 388 A.2d 451 (D.C.1978)).

United States v. Harris

617 A.2d 189 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 30, 1992

The police subsequently found a brown suede bag, containing 15 rounds of ammunition for the gun, on the vehicle floorboard between Harris’s legs. … But see United States v.

Hicks v. District of Columbia

234 A.2d 801 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 14, 1967

Reliance is placed on Chambers v. … Brown v. United States, 16 F.2d 682 (1st Cir. 1926); Segurola v. United States, 16 F.2d 563 (1st Cir.1926); Schroeder v. United States, 7 F.2d 60 (2d Cir.1925); Mularkey v.

Snyder v. Laboy

291 A.2d 194 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 26, 1972

Green v. Chrismon, 223 N.C. 724 , 28 S.E.2d 215 (1943); to the same effect see also Daley v. Board of Police Com’rs of East Hartford, 133 Conn. 716 , 54 A.2d 501 (1947); Hamlen & Son v. … Pyles v. Knight, D.C.App., 282 A.2d 554 (1971).

Dupont Circle Citizens Ass'n v. District of Columbia Zoning Commission

431 A.2d 560 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 21, 1981

Sheridan-Kalorama Neighborhood Council v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 411 A.2d 959, 961 (1979); Barber v. … Id. at 334 (quoting Dietrich v.

Kidd International Home Care, Inc. v. Dallas

901 A.2d 156 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 8, 2006

In Carroll , however, the record evidence before the court was sufficient for it to conclude that “the Board did in fact mail a notice of the hearing date and time to petitioner” at his listed address. Id. … OAH correctly cited Lundahl v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Employment Servs., 596 A.2d 1001 (D.C.1991), and Gaskins v.

Melendez v. United States

26 A.3d 234 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 3, 2011

Dutch v. United States, 997 A.2d 685, 689 (D.C.2010) (citing Brown v. United States, 840 A.2d 82, 88 (D.C.2004)). … See also, e.g., (Larry) Brown v. United States, 840 A.2d 82, 88-89 (D.C.2004).

Gopstein v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

479 A.2d 1278 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 24, 1984

See, e.g., Washington Post Co. v. District of Columbia Unemployment Compensation Board, 377 A.2d 436, 439 (D.C.1977). … Kramer v. D. C. Department of Employment Services, 447 A.2d 28, 30 (D.C.1982).

Stepney v. United States

443 A.2d 555 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 15, 1982

See Clemons v. United States, supra at 1050. … Lewis v. United States, supra (false pretenses conviction for fraudulent claims to Unemployment Compensation Board).

Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Henkel

689 A.2d 1224 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 6, 1997

Board of Regents v. Tomanio, 446 U.S. 478, 487 , 100 S.Ct. 1790, 1796 , 64 L.Ed.2d 440 (1980). … Id.; see also Chase Securities Corp. v. Donaldson, 325 U.S. 304, 314 , 65 S.Ct. 1137, 1142 , 89 L.Ed. 1628 (1945). Bond v. Serano, 566 A.2d 47, 50 (D.C.1989) (Farrell, J., concurring).

Budoo v. United States

677 A.2d 51 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 30, 1996

As the Supreme Court observed in Piemonte v. … See Brown v. Walker, 161 U.S. 591, 600 , 16 S.Ct. 644, 648 , 40 L.Ed. 819 .... The Government of course has an obligation to protect its citizens from harm.

District of Columbia Redevelopment Land Agency v. Dowdey

618 A.2d 153 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 30, 1992

Ingersoll v. Coram, 211 U.S. 335, 368 , 29 S.Ct. 92, 100 , 53 L.Ed. 208 (1908); Walker v. Brown, 165 U.S. 654, 664 , 17 S.Ct. 453, 457 , 41 L.Ed. 865 (1897). … In Dowdey v.

District of Columbia v. Tulin

994 A.2d 788 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 13, 2010

Giles v. Shell Oil Corp., 487 A.2d 610, 613 (D.C.1985). In addition, in Brown v. Argenbright Sec. … As previously noted, however, in Brown v. Argenbright Sec., Inc., 782 A.2d at 760 n. 10, this court made explicit reference to the standard set forth in that Restatement.

Gholson v. United States

532 A.2d 118 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 15, 1987

Auger v. District of Columbia Board of Appeals and Review, 477 A.2d 196, 211 (D.C.1984) (quoting Peoples Drug Stores, Inc. v. District of Columbia, 470 A.2d 751, 753 (D.C.1983) (en banc), other citations omitted). … Jackson v. Concord Co., 54 N.J. 113, 126-27 , 253 A.2d 793, 800 (1969); Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission v.

Dutch v. United States

997 A.2d 685 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 24, 2010

Brown v. United States, 840 A.2d 82, 88 (D.C.2004). … See Patton v.

Anderson v. District of Columbia

48 A.2d 710 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 14, 1946

Trial was had without a jury, ánd. the Government introduced as its sole witness an inspector for-the Minimum Wage and Industrial Safety Board. … Bateman v. Donovan, 9 Cir., 133 F.2d 759 ; Hicks et al. v. Hicks, 196 Ga. 541 , 27 S.E.2d 7 ; Catlin v. Justice, 288 Ky. 270 , 156 S.W.2d 107 . Meade v. Keane, supra. Baltimore & O. R. Co. v.

Burke v. Scaggs

867 A.2d 213 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 27, 2005

James O’Leary, who is also board-certified in obstetrics and gynecology. Although he had retired from the active practice of medicine, Dr. … P’ship v.

Matthews v. United States

322 A.2d 908 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 30, 1974

In Hilliard v. … Saunders v. District of Columbia, D.C.App., 263 A.2d 58, 62 (1970). See, e. g., Campbell v. United States, 365 U.S. 85, 99 , 81 S.Ct. *912 421 , 5 L.Ed.2d 428 (1961); Williams v. United States, supra.

Dailey v. District of Columbia

554 A.2d 339 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 28, 1989

See also Citizens Ass’n of Georgetown v. … State v. Garden, 267 Minn. 97, 111-12 , 125 N.W.2d 591, 600-01 (1963). See also State v. Clow, supra, 215 Minn, at 386, 10 N.W.2d at 362 ; cf. Williams v.

Greater Southeast Community Hospital v. Williams

482 A.2d 394 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 9, 1984

It is certainly not limited to medical malpractice claims but applies across the board to any kind of allegedly tortious conduct resulting in the “death” of a viable fetus. … E.g., Kilmer v. Hicks, 22 Ariz.App. 552 , 529 P.2d 706 (1974); Justus v. Atchison, 19 Cal.3d 564 , 565 P.2d 122 , 139 Cal.Rptr. 97 (1977); Stem v. Miller, 348 So.2d 303 (Fla.1977); Graf v.