Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersdc

7,092 results

1.51s

  • Aikman v. Kanda

    975 A.2d 152 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 25, 2009

    See, e.g., Bunn v. … See also Reaves v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Foster House Tenants Assoc. v. New Bethel Baptist Church Housing Corp. Inc.

    District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 26, 2022

    Brown were on the brief, for appellant. Gwynne L. Booth, with whom Richard W. Luchs and Vincent Mark J. Policy were on the brief, for appellees. … Our decision in Fourth Growth, LLC v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • MP PPH, LLC v. District of Columbia

    District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 17, 2025

    See D.D. v. … See Rose v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Garzon v. District of Columbia Commission on Human Rights

    578 A.2d 1134 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 24, 1990

    See Jacobs v. … Simmons v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Ewing v. United States

    36 A.3d 839 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 9, 2012

    V. … Brown-Robinson also testified that she overheard Ewing threaten Smith to discourage him from snitching. .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • District of Columbia Water & Sewer Authority v. Delon Hampton & Associates

    851 A.2d 410 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 27, 2004

    Duke v. American University, 675 A.2d 26, 28 (D.C.1996). WASA contends, however, that we ruled in District of Columbia v. … In the same case the CAB also said that "any action based on negligence lies not before the Board but in the Superior Court.” Id.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Seufferle v. Macfarland

    28 App. D.C. 94 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 13, 1906

    Co. v. … The case of Essex v. Acton, L. P. 14 App.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hutchinson v. United States

    944 A.2d 491 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 20, 2008

    FARRELL, Associate Judge: In Rivas v. … Id. at 128, 130 ; see Smith v. United States, 899 A.2d 119, 121 (D.C. 2006).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • George Hyman Construction Co. v. District of Columbia

    315 A.2d 175 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 11, 1974

    The court cited the recent case of Berenter v. … Co. v. Lowell, 274 Mass. 477 , 175 N.E. 73 (1931) ; York & York Construction Co. v. Alexander, D.C.App., 296 A.2d 710, 714 (1972).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Off. of the People's Counsel for D.C. v. D.C. Public Serv. Comm'n.

    District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 10, 2022

    See Grand Hyatt Wash. v. D.C. Dep’t of Emp. … M.A.P. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In Re Prosecution of Hall

    31 A.3d 453 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 17, 2011

    See McNeely v. … See Brown v. United States, 979 A.2d 630, 638-39 (D.C.2009).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Georgetown Univ. Hosp. v. EMPLOYMENT SERVS.

    929 A.2d 865 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 2, 2007

    See Clark v. D.C. … Joyner v. D.C.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Frankeny v. District Hospital Partners, LP

    District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 27, 2020

    See Gomez v. Ind. … See, e.g., Arizona v. Maricopa Cty. Med.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Spencer v. Spencer

    494 A.2d 1279 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 26, 1985

    Spencer has moved to New Hampshire where she has a home with sufficient room for the children and the children have familial ties, (2) two of the three children are now in boarding school “far from the District of Columbia … On the other hand, they contemplated at the time of their agreement that all the children eventually would be in boarding school and thus at the marital home for only limited periods of time.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Liuksila v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission

    503 A.2d 666 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 22, 1986

    See Wire Properties v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission, 476 A.2d 679, 682 (D.C.App.1984); Chapin Street Joint Venture v. … See Liberty v. Police and Firemen’s Retirement and Relief Board, 410 A.2d 191, 192-93 (D.C.App.1979) (citing Morgan v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Georgetown University Hospital v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

    929 A.2d 865 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 2, 2007

    See Clark v. D.C. … Joyner v. D.C.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Abdul-Azim v. Howard University Hospital

    213 A.3d 99 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 1, 2019

    Liberty Lobby, Inc. , 477 U.S. 242 , 249, 106 S.Ct. 2505 , 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986) ). " 'If the evidence is merely colorable, or is not significantly probative, summary judgment may be granted.' " Brown v. … Kozisek v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Puckrein v. Jenkins

    884 A.2d 46 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 29, 2005

    Confederate Mem’l Ass’n, supra, 629 A.2d at 39 n. 6 (citation omitted); see also Board of Trs. of the Hotel & Rest. Employees Local 25 v. The Madison Hotel, Inc., 97 F.3d 1479 , 1484 n. 9, 321 U.S.App. … Bank v.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Bembery v. District of Columbia

    758 A.2d 518 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 14, 2000

    See Management Partnership, Inc. v. Crumlin, 423 A.2d 939 , 942 n. * (D.C.1980); Western Union Tel. Co. v. Massman Constr. Co., 402 A.2d 1275, 1277 (D.C.1979). … Washington Loan & Trust Co. v. Darling, 21 App.D.C. 132, 140 (1903). See also, e.g., Keefe Co. v. Americable Int'l Inc., 755 A.2d 469, 471-73 (D.C. 2000); Toomey v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • In re Rips

    947 A.2d 1161 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 15, 2008

    Southall v. United States, 716 A.2d 183, 189 (D.C.1998) (citations omitted). Seeing no such exceptional circumstances here, we decline to review this claim. … This is particularly true where, as here, there is no indication that the form in question was adopted by the Superior Court Board of Judges.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.