Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
7,092 results
5.22s
Richardson v. McCabe, Weisberg & Conway, LLC
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 26, 2024
O’Sullivan and Chasity Brown, as Substitute Trustees of the deed of trust. … See Peoples v.
Cited 0 timesPublished565 A.2d 72 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 18, 1989
Hawthorne v. United States, 476 A.2d 164 , 170-72 & n. 13 (D.C.1984). … You see that it is brown and black. That’s blood. You will see it if you take it out of the bag, if you care to. And you remember when I showed it to the witnesses it had been ripped and torn.
Cited 63 timesPublished955 A.2d 712 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 4, 2008
We addressed a similar situation in Weisberg v. … Co., Inc. v. Brown, 817 A.2d 806, 811 (D.C.2003); see also Wagner v.
Cited 14 timesPublished859 A.2d 641 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 30, 2004
Adams v. United States, 558 A.2d 348, 349 (D.C.1989). … Larry Douglas boarded a Metro bus heading southbound on Georgia Avenue to go to work. He was already a little late and anxious to begin his day. The bus driver, later identified as Mr.
Cited 7 timesPublished623 A.2d 1234 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 4, 1993
People v. … See Lewis v.
Cited 25 timesPublished477 A.2d 1121 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 29, 1984
Davis, President and Chairman of Board of Directors of B.D.S., Inc., a Washington, D.C. corporation, have agreed to extend all parts of the above document now recorded until property is refinanced or paid off by the Purchasers … Flack v. Laster, 417 A.2d 393 , 399 n. 11 (D.C.1980) (quoting Calamari & Perillo, The Law of Contracts 488 (1970)).
Cited 2 timesPublished73 A.3d 1015 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 15, 2013
See Brown v. M St. … In Adams v.
Cited 1 timesPublished711 A.2d 835 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 14, 1998
(1997). 2 See also Robinson v. … Defining residency, as we have noted in other contexts, Lawrence v.
Cited 5 timesPublished404 A.2d 162 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 2, 1979
In Thornton v. … Thornton v. United States, supra; Herbert v. United States, D.C.App., 340 A.2d 802, 804 (1975); see also United States ex rel. Wilcox v. Johnson, 555 F.2d 155 (3d Cir. 1977).
Cited 9 timesPublished515 A.2d 736 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 7, 1986
Konecny v. District of Columbia, 447 A.2d 31, 36 (D.C.1982). … Schlecht v. Schlecht, 387 A.2d 575, 578-79 (D.C.1978).
Cited 14 timesPublished8 App. D.C. 552 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 19, 1896
Supervisors v. Durant, 9 Wall. 736 ; Morse v. Dewey, 3 N. H. 535; Rex v. Mayor of Grampond, 7 T. R. 699; Porter v. Goodman, 1 Cow. 413 . … Commissioner v. Smith, 10 Watts, 392 ; Boggs v. Hargrave, 16 Cal. 559 ; Post v. Leet, 8 Paige, 337 ; Brown v. Frost, 10 Paige, 243 ; Shiveley v. Jones, 6 B. Monroe, 275; Freeman on Executions, sec. 301.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBussineau v. President of Georgetown College
518 A.2d 423 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 26, 1986
Leary v. … In Brown v.
Cited 107 timesPublishedMeta Platforms, Inc. v. District of Columbia
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 14, 2023
See United States v. … Benj Edwards, The Lost Civilization of Dial-Up Bulletin Board Systems, The Atlantic (Nov. 4, 2016).
Cited 0 timesPublished641 A.2d 479 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 9, 1994
“The trial court may permit introduction of such evidence if it is ‘sufficiently explanatory or illustrative or relevant testimony in the case to be of potential help to the trier of fact.’ ” Brown v. … V. 3 .
Cited 12 timesPublishedFowel v. Continental Life Ins. Co.
55 A.2d 205 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 20, 1947
See Wynn v. Washington, D.C.Mun.App., 53 A.2d 275 . Philip Carey Mfg. Co. v. Dean, 6 Cir., 58 F.2d 737 , certiorari denied 287 U.S. 623 , 53 S.Ct. 78 , 77 L.Ed. 541 ; Bijur Motor Lighting Co. v. Eclipse Mach. … Cannady v. Lynch, 27 Minn. 435 , 8 N. W. 164 ; Myers v. State, 37 Tex.Cr.R. 208 , 39 S.W. 111 ; Anderson v. State, 30 Ala.App. 124 , 2 So.2d 461 , certiorari denied 241 Ala. 381 , 2 So.2d 463 .
Cited 5 timesPublished153 A.2d 651 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 6, 1959
People v. Silverstein, 121 Cal.App.2d 140 , 262 P.2d 656 ; Moquin v. State, 216 Md. 524 , 140 A.2d 914 ; State v. … Pierce, 141 Mass. 203 , 6 N.E. 830 ; Commonwealth v. Fisher, 213 Pa. 48 , 62 A. 198 ; Mill v. Brown, 31 Utah 473 , 88 P. 609 ; Milwaukee Industrial School v. Supervisors of Milwaukee County, 40 Wis. 328 . 16 .
Questioned by District of Columbia v. I. P., 1975 D.C. App. LEXIS 340 (1975)Cited 18 timesPublished525 A.2d 200 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 29, 1987
See also Brown v. … .”); Brown v. Texas, supra; see also Johnson, supra, 496 A.2d at 601 and cases from other jurisdictions cited n. 8 (Mack, J., dissenting).
Vacated by Smith v. United States, 1987 D.C. App. LEXIS 528 (1987)Cited 4 timesPublished551 A.2d 1318 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 16, 1988
of insured’s statements indicating he was contemplating suicide; (5) report of psychiatrist’s consultation resulting from contemplated suicide; (6) psychiatric diagnosis; and (7) the transcript of Walter Reed Hospital’s Board … In his dissent, Judge Edgerton argued that all of the proffered medical records (except for the transcript of the Board of Officers’ proceedings) should have been admitted under the federal shopbook statute.
Cited 30 timesPublishedGeorge Hyman Construction Co. v. District of Columbia
315 A.2d 175 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 11, 1974
The court cited the recent case of Berenter v. … Co. v. Lowell, 274 Mass. 477 , 175 N.E. 73 (1931) ; York & York Construction Co. v. Alexander, D.C.App., 296 A.2d 710, 714 (1972).
Cited 6 timesPublished494 A.2d 1279 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 26, 1985
Spencer has moved to New Hampshire where she has a home with sufficient room for the children and the children have familial ties, (2) two of the three children are now in boarding school “far from the District of Columbia … On the other hand, they contemplated at the time of their agreement that all the children eventually would be in boarding school and thus at the marital home for only limited periods of time.
Cited 19 timesPublished
Ask Donna