Case law

Thomas v. United States

586 A.2d 1228 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 26, 1991

See Brown v. … States v.

District of Columbia Fire & Medical Services Department v. District of Columbia Office of Employee Appeals

986 A.2d 419 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 7, 2010

On October 5, 2007, OEA’s governing board upheld the administrative judge’s ruling. … Police Dep’t v. Pinkard, 801 A.2d 86, 90 (D.C.2002) (internal citations omitted) (reversing Superior Court’s affirmance of OEA decision that firing was without cause); see also Brownlee v.

Farrell v. Ward

53 A.2d 46 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 14, 1947

Hazard v. Blessing, 55 App.D.C. 114 , 2 F.2d 916 ; Newman v. Willard’s Hotel Company, 47 App.D.C. 323 . In Simmons v. … See Lindner v. District of Columbia, D.C.Mun.App., 32 A.2d 540 . Cooper v. O’Connor, 69 App.D.C. 100 , 99 F.2d 135 , 118 A.L.R. 1440 , certiorari denied, 305 U.S. 642 , 59 S.Ct. 146 , 83 L.Ed. 414 ; Brown v.

Drayton v. Poretsky Management, Inc.

462 A.2d 1115 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 31, 1983

Earlier, in Far East Conference v. … Udall v. Tallman, 380 U.S. 1, 16-17 , 85 S.Ct. 792, 801-802 , 13 L.Ed.2d 616 (1965); Dankman v. D.C. Board of Elections and Ethics, 443 A.2d 507, 514 (D.C.1981) (en banc); Snider v.

Smith v. United States

343 A.2d 40 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 14, 1975

As long ago as Graves v. … Accord, Haynes v. United States, D.C.App., 318 A.2d 901, 902 (1974); Carver v. United States, D.C.App., 312 A.2d 773, 774 (1973); Fleming v. United States, D.C.App., 310 A.2d 214, 220 (1973). 8 . United States v.

District of Columbia v. King

766 A.2d 38 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 25, 2001

Metropolitan Police Dept. v. Baker, 564 A.2d 1155, 1159 (D.C.1989) (quoting Baumgartner v. Police & Firemen’s Retirement & Relief Board, 527 A.2d 313, 316 (D.C.1987)). … As the Merit Systems Protection Board stated in Griffin v. Department of the Navy, 64 M.S.P.R. 561 (1994): An employee’s competitive level in a RIF is based on his official position of record. See Estrin v.

Jones v. Jackson

416 A.2d 249 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 11, 1980

See Bell v. Putman, 548 F.2d 749, 751 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 958 , 97 S.Ct. 2684 , 53 L.Ed.2d 277 (1977); McKinney v. Taylor, 358 F.2d 689, 690 (10th Cir. 1966); Birch v. … United States Board of Parole, 416 F.Supp. 759, 761-62 (M.D.Pa. 1976), aff’d, 547 F.2d 1164 (3d Cir. 1977).

United States v. Pope

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 18, 2024

See, e.g., Allison, 623 A.2d at 591-92 (holding defendant abandoned his gun when he threw it under a bush during a police pursuit); (Maurice) Brown v. … Brown v. United States, 627 A.2d 499, 503 (D.C. 1993) (referring to “normal expectations of privacy enjoyed by homeowners (or renters), or even their overnight guests”); cf.

United States ex rel. Trussed Concrete Steel Co. v. Ewing

42 App. D.C. 179 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 6, 1914

And the Commissioner may issue a patent1 to the party who is adjudged the prior inventor, unless the adverse party *183 appeals from the decision of the Primary Examiner, or of the board of Examiners in Chief, as the case … Ness v. Fisher, 223 U. S. 683 , 56 L. ed. 610, 32 Sup. Ct. Rep. 356. Since the patent has been issued to Clark, relator has a double remedy,—one for infringement, and a special remedy provided by sec. 4918, U. S. Rev.

GUY DURANT v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ZONING COMMISSION, & 901 MONROE STREET, LLC, Intervenor.

139 A.3d 880 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 26, 2016

Brown for petitioners. Karl A. Racine, Attorney General for the District of Columbia, Todd S. Kim, Solicitor General, Loren L. AliKhan, Deputy Solicitor General, and Richard S. … Levy v. District of Columbia Rental Hous. Comm’n, 126 A.3d 684, 688 (D.C. 2015).

Jolly v. United States

704 A.2d 855 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 23, 1997

Jenkins v. United States, 541 A.2d 1269, 1274 (D.C.1988) (quoting Harvin v. United States, 297 A.2d 774, 777-78 (D.C.1972)). See also Brown v. United States, 119 U.S.App. … Francisco Brown heard the shooting from a distance and saw two men run by; he recognized the one carrying the gun as Taylor. 3 .

Dalo v. Kivitz

596 A.2d 35 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 7, 1991

Brown, 365 A.2d 381, 386 (D.C.1976), to support the argument that attorney’s fees incurred in prosecuting an action for legal malpractice are properly characterized as compensatory damages for that case. … See, e.g., Winter v. Brown, supra note 10 , 365 A.2d at 384-85 . 18 . See also, e.g., Collins v.

Blohm v. District of Columbia

113 A.2d 111 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 30, 1955

United States v. Debrow, 346 U.S. 374 , 74 S.Ct. 113, 114 , 98 L.Ed. 92 , and cases cited therein; Young v. … Louis v. Howell, 8 Cir., 165 F.2d 135 , and other cases; Norfolk & W. Ry. Co. v. Trautwein, 6 Cir., 111 F.2d 923 .

APARTMENT & OB ASS'N OF MET. WASH. v. Washington

343 A.2d 323 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 16, 1975

See Berger v. Board of Psychologist Examiners for the District of Columbia, D.C.App., 313 A.2d 602, 604-605 (1973). … Freeport Hall Associates v.

Fox v. United States

421 A.2d 9 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 22, 1980

Byrd v. United States, supra at 1229; see Banks v. … See United States v. Brown, 160 U.S.App.D.C. 190, 209 , 490 F.2d 758, 777 (1974).

Benson v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 5, 2026

Snope v. Brown, 605 U.S. ---, 145 S. Ct. 1534, 1534 (2025) (mem.) … Snope v. Brown, 145 S. Ct. 1534 (2025).

Fields v. District of Columbia

232 A.2d 300 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 25, 1967

To be licensed an applicant had to pass an examination in various fields of the optician’s skills as well as the practical anatomy of the eye. 20 Also, in State Board of Optometry v. … Reed v.

Wilson v. United States

419 A.2d 353 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 23, 1980

During an interval of about thirty minutes, both officers observed appellant approach three different automobiles and exchange brown manilla envelopes for undetermined amounts of money. … Rogers v. United States, 422 U.S. 35 , 95 S.Ct. 2091 , 45 L.Ed.2d 1 (1975); Roberts v. United States, D.C.App., 402 A.2d 441 (1979); Smith v.

Kim Long Ko v. United States

694 A.2d 73 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 8, 1997

Section 31-2701(1) defines “appointing authority” as “the presiding judge of any court of the District of Columbia, the chairperson of any District of Columbia board or commission, the director or commissioner of any department … State v. Masato Karumai, 101 Utah 592 , 126 P.2d 1047, 1050 (Utah 1942). We fully agree with the wisdom embedded in this quotation. The emphasis is placed on a “competent and impartial interpreter.”

Moattar v. Foxhall Surgical Associates

694 A.2d 435 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 30, 1997

Moattar presented two expert witnesses, a Board Certified general surgeon *437 and a Board Certified internist specializing in oncology, who both testified that it was “more likely than not” that she would not survive another … Hughes v. Pender, 391 A.2d 259, 261 (D.C.1978). .