Case law

Green v. United States

651 A.2d 817 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 29, 1994

See Jackson v. … See Pennsylvania v. Ritchie, 480 U.S. 39, 57-58 , 107 S.Ct. 989, 1001 , 94 L.Ed.2d 40 (1987); Exline v. Gunter, 985 F.2d 487, 488-91 (10th Cir.1993); Brown v.

Reshard v. Stevenson

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 24, 2022

Brown v. … Brown, 841 A.2d at 334.

Walker v. Smith

499 A.2d 446 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 24, 1985

Newborn v. U.S. Life Credit Corp., 473 A.2d 389, 391 (D.C.1984); Cobb v. Cobb, 462 A.2d 461, 463 (D.C.1983); Jones v. Hunt, 298 A.2d 220, 221 (D.C.1972); Brown v. Cooke, 219 A.2d 256, 257 (D.C.1966). … See Nicholas v.

Kelly v. Parents United for the District of Columbia Public Schools

641 A.2d 159 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 5, 1994

See Suter v. … See Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2709 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972) (“To have a property interest in a benefit, a person clearly must have more than an abstract need or desire for it....

Vernice Bowles v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

121 A.3d 1264 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 6, 2015

The DOES Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) determined that Bowles suffered the 10% PPD; the DOES Compensation Review Board (“CRB”) affirmed. … SEC v. Chenery Corp. (“Chenery I”), 318 U.S. 80 (1943); SEC v. Chenery Corp. (“Chenery II”), 332 U.S. 194 (1947).

Pazianos v. Schenker

366 A.2d 440 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 8, 1976

Bowen v. Mount Vernon Savings Bank, 70 App.D.C. 273 , 105 F.2d 796 (1939); Von Rosen v. Dean, 59 App.D.C. 359 , 41 F.2d 982 (1930). … Brown v. Clark, 14 D.C. (3 Mackey) 185, 188 (1884); see Richards v. Bippus, 18 App.D.C. 293, 305 (1901). We find nothing in Baer that requires us to change this long-standing rule.

Davis v. Davis

29 App. D.C. 258 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 5, 1907

Slade, 106 Mass. 499, 500 ; Harrison v. Harrison, 20 Ala. 629 , 56 Am. Dec. 227 ; Hansford v. Van Auken, 79 Ind. 302, 305 ; Becknell v. Becknell, 110 Ind. 42, 47 , 10 N. E. 414 ; McCracken v. Swartz, 5 Or. 62 ; Clark v. … The divorce was not absolute, but from bed and board, a mere judicial separation.

Smith v. United States

20 A.3d 759 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 26, 2011

United States v. Denedo, - U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 2213, 2221 , 173 L.Ed.2d 1235 (2009); Magnus v. United States, 11 A.3d 237, 246 (D.C.2011). … v.

District of Columbia v. Gueory

376 A.2d 834 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 25, 1977

Judges, and PAIR, Associate Judge, Retired. [*] NEBEKER, Associate Judge: This appeal presents the question whether the trial court erred in dismissing an information charging disruption of a District of Columbia School Board … Compare Police Department v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92 , 92 S.Ct. 2286 , 33 L.Ed.2d 212 (1972); Jones v. Board of Regents of the University of Arizona, 436 F.2d 618 (9th Cir. 1970).

United States v. Cozart

321 A.2d 342 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 17, 1974

However, the discrimination condemned in Yick Wo did not involve the activities of law enforcement officers; rather, it involved the activities of a municipal board of supervisors which issued permits to laundries. … People v. Utica Daw’s Drug Co., supra note 6.

Petition of RMG

454 A.2d 776 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 29, 1982

See Caban v. Mohammed, 441 U.S. 380 , 99 S.Ct. 1760 , 60 L.Ed.2d 297 (1979). . See 1 Kings 3:16-28. . … [Brown, Davis, Lee: The Negro Caravan (1941).]

White v. United States

729 A.2d 330 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 22, 1999

In Hackes v. … In Brown v.

Ali v. District of Columbia

612 A.2d 228 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 25, 1992

In Shelvy v. … In Winters v.

Gethers v. United States

684 A.2d 1266 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 31, 1996

Brown v. United States, 409 A.2d 1093, 1097 (D.C.1979) (citations omitted); accord, Beale v. United States, 465 A.2d 796, 803 (D.C.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1030 , 104 S.Ct. 1293 , 79 L.Ed.2d 694 (1984). … Our recent decision in Winfield v. United States, 676 A.2d 1 (D.C.1996) (en banc), replaced the “clearly link” portion of the standard articulated in Brown and Beale with the test for determining relevance in general.

Harris v. NORTHBROOK CONDOMINIUM II

44 A.3d 293 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 24, 2012

See Apao v. … Knapp v.

In Re Downey

960 A.2d 1135 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 4, 2008

Accordingly, we grant respondent’s motion to stay the suspension that § 10(c) would otherwise require, without prejudice to Bar Counsel’s moving to vacate the stay after the Board on Professional Responsibility’s report and … Restaurant Equip. & Supply Depot, Inc. v. Gutierrez, 852 A.2d 951, 956 (D.C.2004) (citation omitted).

Rachal v. Rachal

412 A.2d 1202 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 25, 1980

Bazemore v. Davis, D.C.App., 394 A.2d 1377 (1978); Dixon v. Dixon, D.C.App., 190 A.2d 652, 654 (1963); Knight v. Knight, D.C.Mun.App., 134 A.2d 380, 381 (1957). … Beck-with v. Beckwith, D.C.App., 355 A.2d 537 (1976).

Poyner v. Loftus

694 A.2d 69 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 8, 1997

See District of Columbia v. Brown, 589 A.2d 384, 387-88 (D.C.1991) (citations omitted). … Cook v. City of Winston-Salem, 241 N.C. 422 , 85 S.E.2d 696, 700-01 (1955) (citing, inter alia, Keith v. Worcester & Blackstone Valley St. Ry. Co., 196 Mass. 478 , 82 N.E. 680 (1907)).

National Graduate University v. District of Columbia

346 A.2d 740 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 31, 1975

See Jewish War Veterans v. District of Columbia, supra; Congregational Home v. *743 District of Columbia, 92 U.S.App.D.C. 73 , 202 F.2d 808 (1953). … We note that the drafters of the Rules adopted by the Board of Judges for the Tax Division of the Superior Court approved a similar construction of § 47-2403.

Gammeter v. Thropp

42 App. D.C. 564 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 7, 1914

The construction to be placed upon the counts is properly stated by the Board of Examiners in Chief as follows: “In our opinion these counts are not hroad enough to cover a mere guide ring which is used to direct a bead strip … Burson v. Vogel, 29 App. D. C. 388; Norling v. Hayes, 37 App. D. C. 169.